Scroll, Stop, Shop: Decoding impulsive buying in social commerce

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114776
Hamed Azad Moghddam , Jamie Carlson , Jessica Wyllie , Syed Mahmudur Rahman
{"title":"Scroll, Stop, Shop: Decoding impulsive buying in social commerce","authors":"Hamed Azad Moghddam ,&nbsp;Jamie Carlson ,&nbsp;Jessica Wyllie ,&nbsp;Syed Mahmudur Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technological advancements within social commerce platforms, such as “action buttons” on Facebook or Instagram (e.g., the “Shop” button), have simplified how customers interact with brands, leading to greater impulse buying opportunities. Using a mixed methodology in two studies involving Instagram users in the United States (US), this research conceptualizes (Study 1) and operationalizes (Study 2) a higher-order model of consumer motivation for social commerce engagement as a hierarchical construct that drives the urge to impulse buy. Further, consumer–brand identification and perceived social risk of commenting are included in the proposed framework. Results show consumer motives of brand intimacy, shopping planning, entertainment, channel advantage, remuneration, and escapism influence impulse buying. Findings further identify consumer–brand identification as a mediating mechanism between consumer motivation and the urge for impulse buying, which also neutralizes the negative moderating effect of the perceived social risk of commenting on social platforms. This study contributes to motivation and impulse buying theory as well as social commerce practice. The findings inform content marketing activities seeking to heighten customers’ urge for impulse buying and mitigate contingency variables. This study also acknowledges related ethical considerations, including the need for brands to understand the urge to impulse buying behaviors to ensure responsible marketing practices that align with principles of consumer well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002807/pdfft?md5=1d32d9f35991e64e309ae94e879a99a8&pid=1-s2.0-S0148296324002807-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002807","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advancements within social commerce platforms, such as “action buttons” on Facebook or Instagram (e.g., the “Shop” button), have simplified how customers interact with brands, leading to greater impulse buying opportunities. Using a mixed methodology in two studies involving Instagram users in the United States (US), this research conceptualizes (Study 1) and operationalizes (Study 2) a higher-order model of consumer motivation for social commerce engagement as a hierarchical construct that drives the urge to impulse buy. Further, consumer–brand identification and perceived social risk of commenting are included in the proposed framework. Results show consumer motives of brand intimacy, shopping planning, entertainment, channel advantage, remuneration, and escapism influence impulse buying. Findings further identify consumer–brand identification as a mediating mechanism between consumer motivation and the urge for impulse buying, which also neutralizes the negative moderating effect of the perceived social risk of commenting on social platforms. This study contributes to motivation and impulse buying theory as well as social commerce practice. The findings inform content marketing activities seeking to heighten customers’ urge for impulse buying and mitigate contingency variables. This study also acknowledges related ethical considerations, including the need for brands to understand the urge to impulse buying behaviors to ensure responsible marketing practices that align with principles of consumer well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滚动、停止、购物:解码社交商务中的冲动性购买
社交商务平台上的技术进步,如 Facebook 或 Instagram 上的 "行动按钮"(如 "购物 "按钮),简化了消费者与品牌互动的方式,带来了更多冲动购买的机会。本研究在两项涉及美国 Instagram 用户的研究中采用了混合方法,将消费者参与社交商务的动机概念化(研究 1)和操作化(研究 2),并将其作为驱动冲动购买的分层结构的高阶模型。此外,消费者对品牌的认同和感知到的评论社会风险也被纳入了拟议框架。结果表明,消费者的品牌亲密感、购物计划、娱乐、渠道优势、报酬和逃避现实等动机会影响冲动购买。研究结果进一步确定了消费者-品牌认同是消费者动机与冲动性购买之间的中介机制,同时也中和了在社交平台上发表评论的社会风险感知的负面调节作用。本研究对动机和冲动性购买理论以及社交商务实践都有所贡献。研究结果为内容营销活动提供了参考,这些内容营销活动旨在增强顾客的冲动性购买冲动,并缓解或然性变量。本研究还考虑到了相关的道德因素,包括品牌需要了解冲动购买行为,以确保负责任的营销实践符合消费者福祉原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance of Building Refurbishments: Predictive and Prescriptive AI-based Machine Learning Approaches Digital transformation along the supply chain: Spillover effects from vertical partnerships Bridging consumption and work: The effects of thoughts about different types of purchases on job-related motivations A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance The more, the better: The influence of overconfident CEOs on their firms’ digital orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1