Perspectives on forestry management: How do bats fit in?

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Science and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1111/csp2.13160
Tara Hohoff, Brittany Rogness, Mark Davis
{"title":"Perspectives on forestry management: How do bats fit in?","authors":"Tara Hohoff,&nbsp;Brittany Rogness,&nbsp;Mark Davis","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last decade, bat conservation guidance has received increasing attention, as many United States bat species are in decline due to white-nose syndrome and have been listed or considered for federal endangered species status. Research on how these species are impacted by forestry management decisions has advanced to provide specific conservation actions for these imperiled species. We set out to better understand the level of knowledge land managers had in relation to forestry techniques and their impact on wildlife conservation in order to more effectively strategize how we can efficiently provide educational resources. We surveyed 78 land managers in Illinois to identify their priorities for management and how familiar they were with forestry management guidelines for bat conservation. We followed up with a subset of voluntary participants with semistructured phone interviews to generate more in-depth responses. Using these tools, we reveal that a top priority for most managers in Illinois is invasive species management. Most have some familiarity with bat conservation actions, but few were confident in their knowledge of threatened and endangered species. Thirteen of the twenty phone interviews identified a preference for talking to/hearing from experts to receive information on bat conservation. These results highlighted where there are information gaps on best practices for forestry management from a conservation perspective, and identified how we can best address these through partnerships with land managers. Implementation of these practices is likely how recovery of these vulnerable species will happen—through protection of their basic needs, including availability of roosts, abundance of prey, and access to uncontaminated water resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13160","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last decade, bat conservation guidance has received increasing attention, as many United States bat species are in decline due to white-nose syndrome and have been listed or considered for federal endangered species status. Research on how these species are impacted by forestry management decisions has advanced to provide specific conservation actions for these imperiled species. We set out to better understand the level of knowledge land managers had in relation to forestry techniques and their impact on wildlife conservation in order to more effectively strategize how we can efficiently provide educational resources. We surveyed 78 land managers in Illinois to identify their priorities for management and how familiar they were with forestry management guidelines for bat conservation. We followed up with a subset of voluntary participants with semistructured phone interviews to generate more in-depth responses. Using these tools, we reveal that a top priority for most managers in Illinois is invasive species management. Most have some familiarity with bat conservation actions, but few were confident in their knowledge of threatened and endangered species. Thirteen of the twenty phone interviews identified a preference for talking to/hearing from experts to receive information on bat conservation. These results highlighted where there are information gaps on best practices for forestry management from a conservation perspective, and identified how we can best address these through partnerships with land managers. Implementation of these practices is likely how recovery of these vulnerable species will happen—through protection of their basic needs, including availability of roosts, abundance of prey, and access to uncontaminated water resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
林业管理视角:蝙蝠如何参与其中?
在过去的十年中,蝙蝠保护指导受到越来越多的关注,因为美国的许多蝙蝠物种由于白鼻综合症而减少,并已被列入或考虑列入联邦濒危物种名单。有关这些物种如何受到林业管理决策影响的研究取得了进展,为这些濒危物种提供了具体的保护措施。我们着手更好地了解土地管理者对林业技术的了解程度及其对野生动物保护的影响,以便更有效地制定如何高效提供教育资源的战略。我们对伊利诺伊州的 78 名土地管理者进行了调查,以确定他们的管理重点,以及他们对蝙蝠保护林业管理指南的熟悉程度。我们对一部分自愿参与者进行了半结构化电话采访,以获得更深入的回答。利用这些工具,我们发现伊利诺伊州大多数管理人员的首要任务是入侵物种管理。大多数人对蝙蝠保护行动有一定的了解,但很少有人对自己对受威胁和濒危物种的了解有信心。在 20 个电话访谈中,有 13 个访谈者表示更愿意与专家交谈或听专家介绍蝙蝠保护方面的信息。这些结果突显了从保护角度看林业管理最佳实践方面的信息缺口,并确定了我们如何通过与土地管理者合作来最好地解决这些问题。这些实践的实施很可能是这些脆弱物种恢复的方式--通过保护它们的基本需求,包括栖息地的可用性、猎物的丰富性以及不受污染的水资源的获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Motivating residents to volunteer for urban waterway restoration: A segmentation approach Impact of drought and development on the effectiveness of beehive fences as elephant deterrents over 9 years in Kenya Quantifying public support for culling crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster spp.) on the Great Barrier Reef Development of an assay for the detection of the federally threatened Florida eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi) using soil eDNA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1