The relationship between value preference and gender in future teachers in Chilean higher education

Nurture Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.55951/nurture.v18i3.753
Rodrigo Arellano Saavedra, Ranjeeva Ranjan, Andrew Philominraj, Claudio Andrés Cerón Urzúa
{"title":"The relationship between value preference and gender in future teachers in Chilean higher education","authors":"Rodrigo Arellano Saavedra, Ranjeeva Ranjan, Andrew Philominraj, Claudio Andrés Cerón Urzúa","doi":"10.55951/nurture.v18i3.753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to examine the values associated with pedagogical training and the differences in value preferences among students based on gender in institutions in the central-southern area of Chile. The objective of the research was to analyse the values associated with pedagogical training and the differences in value preferences according to the gender of students in universities in the central-southern area of Chile. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: The methodology used in the study is quantitative and descriptive. The study sample consisted of 437 students from Chilean universities. The information was collected using a standardized instrument called the adapted values test. \nFindings: The results indicated a clear preponderance in the categories of moral, ecological, individual, affective and bodily values. Political and moral values were not particularly taken into consideration. Significant differences were found concerning gender. Females achieve higher mean scores than males except in instrumental values. \nConclusions: The results show the educational needs of future teachers in terms of axiological training from a gender perspective. \nPractical Implications: Identifying and analyzing the axiological structure of students and teachers in private and public universities in Chile will allow proposing value education in the curricular plans of future teachers. On the other hand, the values transmitted by teachers are different which implies the development of pedagogical training programs that strengthen gender differences as an instance of cultural equity. \nContribution to the Literature: This research underscores the importance of value education in teacher training programs and explains how university students perceive them.","PeriodicalId":508605,"journal":{"name":"Nurture","volume":"58 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v18i3.753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the values associated with pedagogical training and the differences in value preferences among students based on gender in institutions in the central-southern area of Chile. The objective of the research was to analyse the values associated with pedagogical training and the differences in value preferences according to the gender of students in universities in the central-southern area of Chile. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology used in the study is quantitative and descriptive. The study sample consisted of 437 students from Chilean universities. The information was collected using a standardized instrument called the adapted values test. Findings: The results indicated a clear preponderance in the categories of moral, ecological, individual, affective and bodily values. Political and moral values were not particularly taken into consideration. Significant differences were found concerning gender. Females achieve higher mean scores than males except in instrumental values. Conclusions: The results show the educational needs of future teachers in terms of axiological training from a gender perspective. Practical Implications: Identifying and analyzing the axiological structure of students and teachers in private and public universities in Chile will allow proposing value education in the curricular plans of future teachers. On the other hand, the values transmitted by teachers are different which implies the development of pedagogical training programs that strengthen gender differences as an instance of cultural equity. Contribution to the Literature: This research underscores the importance of value education in teacher training programs and explains how university students perceive them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智利高等教育中未来教师的价值偏好与性别之间的关系
目的:本研究旨在探讨与教学培训相关的价值观,以及智利中南部地区各院校学生在价值观偏好上的性别差异。研究目的是分析与教学培训相关的价值观,以及智利中南部地区高校学生因性别不同而在价值观偏好上存在的差异。设计/方法/途径:研究采用定量和描述性方法。研究样本包括智利各大学的 437 名学生。信息收集使用了一种名为 "适应价值观测试 "的标准化工具。研究结果结果表明,道德、生态、个人、情感和身体价值观明显占优势。政治和道德价值观没有得到特别考虑。性别差异显著。除工具价值观外,女性的平均得分高于男性。结论研究结果表明,从性别角度看,未来的教师需要接受公理培训。实际意义:对智利私立和公立大学学生和教师的公理结构进行识别和分析,有助于在未来教师的课程计划中提出价值观教育。另一方面,教师传播的价值观也不尽相同,这就需要制定教学培训计划,加强性别差异,以体现文化平等。对文献的贡献:这项研究强调了教师培训计划中价值观教育的重要性,并解释了大学生是如何看待价值观教育的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relationship between value preference and gender in future teachers in Chilean higher education The effect of organizational ethics on increasing the performance of workers in small and medium-sized enterprises Impact of choice attributes perceived by Korean airline passengers on relationship quality during the COVID-19 pandemic Development of a creative collaborative with critical experience learning model to improve technological pedagogical and content knowledge of preservice chemistry teachers Financial inclusion strategy to increase the income of micro, small and medium enterprises through business credit in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1