USE OF NUTRIENT RISK IN CRITICALLY ILL SCORE TO ASSESS NUTRITIONAL RISK IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS

MA Ali, W. Ishtiaq, SU Din, MM Sajjad, S. Ali, J. Khan
{"title":"USE OF NUTRIENT RISK IN CRITICALLY ILL SCORE TO ASSESS NUTRITIONAL RISK IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS","authors":"MA Ali, W. Ishtiaq, SU Din, MM Sajjad, S. Ali, J. Khan","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ensuring proper nutritional support is crucial for critically ill patients. This nutritional deficit is closely associated with heightened susceptibility to nosocomial infections, delayed wound healing, and an escalated risk of mortality. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nutrient Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score in assessing the nutritional risk of mechanically ventilated patients.  Method: It is a cross-sectional study. It is conducted at the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad from 1st Jan 2024 to 30 May 2024. The calculated sample size was 381 selected by non-probability consecutive sampling. The study utilized the modified Nutritional Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score to assess nutritional risk in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. Data will be analyzed using SPSS 24.0. A P value of ≤ 5 will be significant Result: The study included a total of 381 participants, with a mean age of 55.7 ± 17.5 years and, a BMI was 23.7 ± 3.5. 219 (57.48%) had low nutritional risk (NUTRIC score ≤4), while 162 (42.51%) had high nutritional risk (NUTRIC score ≥5). Patients in the high nutritional risk group had a longer stay in the intensive care unit (ICU),  had fewer ventilator-free days and had higher mortality rates compared to those in the low nutritional risk group (8.5 ± 4.1 days vs. 5.2 ± 3.9 days, p-value < 0.01). Conclusion: The study highlights the significance of the NUTRIC score as a valuable tool for the estimation of nutritional risk among mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU setting","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring proper nutritional support is crucial for critically ill patients. This nutritional deficit is closely associated with heightened susceptibility to nosocomial infections, delayed wound healing, and an escalated risk of mortality. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Nutrient Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score in assessing the nutritional risk of mechanically ventilated patients.  Method: It is a cross-sectional study. It is conducted at the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad from 1st Jan 2024 to 30 May 2024. The calculated sample size was 381 selected by non-probability consecutive sampling. The study utilized the modified Nutritional Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score to assess nutritional risk in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients. Data will be analyzed using SPSS 24.0. A P value of ≤ 5 will be significant Result: The study included a total of 381 participants, with a mean age of 55.7 ± 17.5 years and, a BMI was 23.7 ± 3.5. 219 (57.48%) had low nutritional risk (NUTRIC score ≤4), while 162 (42.51%) had high nutritional risk (NUTRIC score ≥5). Patients in the high nutritional risk group had a longer stay in the intensive care unit (ICU),  had fewer ventilator-free days and had higher mortality rates compared to those in the low nutritional risk group (8.5 ± 4.1 days vs. 5.2 ± 3.9 days, p-value < 0.01). Conclusion: The study highlights the significance of the NUTRIC score as a valuable tool for the estimation of nutritional risk among mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU setting
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用重症患者营养风险评分评估机械通气患者的营养风险
确保为危重病人提供适当的营养支持至关重要。营养不良与患者更易发生院内感染、伤口愈合延迟以及死亡风险增加密切相关。研究目的本研究旨在评估重症患者营养风险(NUTRIC)评分在评估机械通气患者营养风险方面的有效性。 研究方法这是一项横断面研究。研究于 2024 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 5 月 30 日在伊斯兰堡希法国际医院重症医学科进行。通过非概率连续抽样,计算出样本量为 381 人。研究采用改良的重症患者营养风险(mNUTRIC)评分来评估机械通气(MV)患者的营养风险。数据将使用 SPSS 24.0 进行分析。P值≤5为显著结果:研究共纳入 381 名参与者,平均年龄为 55.7 ± 17.5 岁,体重指数为 23.7 ± 3.5。219人(57.48%)营养风险较低(NUTRIC评分≤4分),162人(42.51%)营养风险较高(NUTRIC评分≥5分)。与低营养风险组患者相比,高营养风险组患者在重症监护室(ICU)的住院时间更长,无呼吸机天数更少,死亡率更高(8.5 ± 4.1 天 vs. 5.2 ± 3.9 天,P 值 < 0.01)。结论该研究强调了 NUTRIC 评分的重要性,它是估计重症监护病房机械通气患者营养风险的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DOES PREOPERATIVE COUNSELLING HELP IMPROVE PATIENTS’ SATISFACTION WITH PAIN MANAGEMENT IN POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PAKISTANI PATIENTS UNDERGOING PCI: A MULTICENTER STUDY EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA VARIETIES FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND YIELD STABILITY AT DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANESTHETIC BLOCK TECHNIQUES (V-BLOCK VS. H-BLOCK) FOR REMOVAL OF INGROWN TOENAIL ROLE OF CHYMOTRYPSIN IN POST-OPERATIVE WOUND MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR SURGERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1