Beyond Text: Multimodal Credibility Assessment Approaches for Online User-Generated Content

IF 7.2 4区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1145/3673236
Monika Choudhary, S. Chouhan, Santosh Singh Rathore
{"title":"Beyond Text: Multimodal Credibility Assessment Approaches for Online User-Generated Content","authors":"Monika Choudhary, S. Chouhan, Santosh Singh Rathore","doi":"10.1145/3673236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User-Generated Content (UGC) is increasingly becoming prevalent on various digital platforms. The content generated on social media, review forums, and question-answer platforms impacts a larger audience and influences their political, social, and other cognitive abilities. Traditional credibility assessment mechanisms involve assessing the credibility of the source and the text. However, with the increase in how user content can be generated and shared (audio, video, images), multimodal representation of User-Generated Content has become increasingly popular. This paper reviews the credibility assessment of UGC in various domains, particularly identifying fake news, suspicious profiles, and fake reviews and testimonials, focusing on both textual content and the source of the content creator. Next, the concept of multimodal credibility assessment is presented, which also includes audio, video, and images in addition to text. After that, the paper presents a systematic review and comprehensive analysis of work done in the credibility assessment of UGC considering multimodal features. Additionally, the paper provides extensive details on the publicly available multimodal datasets for the credibility assessment of UGC. In the end, the research gaps, challenges, and future directions in assessing the credibility of multimodal user-generated content are presented.","PeriodicalId":48967,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3673236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

User-Generated Content (UGC) is increasingly becoming prevalent on various digital platforms. The content generated on social media, review forums, and question-answer platforms impacts a larger audience and influences their political, social, and other cognitive abilities. Traditional credibility assessment mechanisms involve assessing the credibility of the source and the text. However, with the increase in how user content can be generated and shared (audio, video, images), multimodal representation of User-Generated Content has become increasingly popular. This paper reviews the credibility assessment of UGC in various domains, particularly identifying fake news, suspicious profiles, and fake reviews and testimonials, focusing on both textual content and the source of the content creator. Next, the concept of multimodal credibility assessment is presented, which also includes audio, video, and images in addition to text. After that, the paper presents a systematic review and comprehensive analysis of work done in the credibility assessment of UGC considering multimodal features. Additionally, the paper provides extensive details on the publicly available multimodal datasets for the credibility assessment of UGC. In the end, the research gaps, challenges, and future directions in assessing the credibility of multimodal user-generated content are presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越文本:在线用户生成内容的多模式可信度评估方法
用户生成内容(UGC)在各种数字平台上日益盛行。社交媒体、评论论坛和问答平台上产生的内容影响着更多受众,并影响着他们的政治、社会和其他认知能力。传统的可信度评估机制涉及评估来源和文本的可信度。然而,随着用户内容生成和共享方式(音频、视频、图像)的增加,用户生成内容的多模态表示也越来越受欢迎。本文回顾了不同领域中用户生成内容的可信度评估,特别是识别假新闻、可疑资料、虚假评论和推荐,重点关注文本内容和内容创建者的来源。接下来,本文提出了多模态可信度评估的概念,除文本外,还包括音频、视频和图像。之后,本文对考虑到多模态特征的 UGC 可信度评估工作进行了系统回顾和全面分析。此外,本文还详细介绍了用于 UGC 可信度评估的公开多模态数据集。最后,还介绍了在评估多模态用户生成内容可信度方面的研究空白、挑战和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology is a scholarly journal that publishes the highest quality papers on intelligent systems, applicable algorithms and technology with a multi-disciplinary perspective. An intelligent system is one that uses artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to offer important services (e.g., as a component of a larger system) to allow integrated systems to perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently in the real world. ACM TIST is published quarterly (six issues a year). Each issue has 8-11 regular papers, with around 20 published journal pages or 10,000 words per paper. Additional references, proofs, graphs or detailed experiment results can be submitted as a separate appendix, while excessively lengthy papers will be rejected automatically. Authors can include online-only appendices for additional content of their published papers and are encouraged to share their code and/or data with other readers.
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning: Issues, Solutions, and Challenges DeepSneak: User GPS Trajectory Reconstruction from Federated Route Recommendation Models WC-SBERT: Zero-Shot Topic Classification Using SBERT and Light Self-Training on Wikipedia Categories Self-supervised Text Style Transfer using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks Federated Learning Survey: A Multi-Level Taxonomy of Aggregation Techniques, Experimental Insights, and Future Frontiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1