A Comparative Study of Susceptibility and Hazard for Mass Movements Applying Quantitative Machine Learning Techniques—Case Study: Northern Lima Commonwealth, Peru

Edwin Badillo-Rivera, Manuel Olcese, Ramiro Santiago, Teófilo Poma, Neftalí Muñoz, Carlos Rojas-León, Teodosio Chávez, Luz Eyzaguirre, César Rodríguez, Fernando Oyanguren
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Susceptibility and Hazard for Mass Movements Applying Quantitative Machine Learning Techniques—Case Study: Northern Lima Commonwealth, Peru","authors":"Edwin Badillo-Rivera, Manuel Olcese, Ramiro Santiago, Teófilo Poma, Neftalí Muñoz, Carlos Rojas-León, Teodosio Chávez, Luz Eyzaguirre, César Rodríguez, Fernando Oyanguren","doi":"10.3390/geosciences14060168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses the importance of conducting mass movement susceptibility mapping and hazard assessment using quantitative techniques, including machine learning, in the Northern Lima Commonwealth (NLC). A previous exploration of the topographic variables revealed a high correlation and multicollinearity among some of them, which led to dimensionality reduction through a principal component analysis (PCA). Six susceptibility models were generated using weights of evidence, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, random forest, and naive Bayes methods to produce quantitative susceptibility maps and assess the hazard associated with two scenarios: the first being El Niño phenomenon and the second being an earthquake exceeding 8.8 Mw. The main findings indicate that machine learning models exhibit excellent predictive performance for the presence and absence of mass movement events, as all models surpassed an AUC value of >0.9, with the random forest model standing out. In terms of hazard levels, in the event of an El Niño phenomenon or an earthquake exceeding 8.8 Mw, approximately 40% and 35% respectively, of the NLC area would be exposed to the highest hazard levels. The importance of integrating methodologies in mass movement susceptibility models is also emphasized; these methodologies include the correlation analysis, multicollinearity assessment, dimensionality reduction of variables, and coupling statistical models with machine learning models to improve the predictive accuracy of machine learning models. The findings of this research are expected to serve as a supportive tool for land managers in formulating effective disaster prevention and risk reduction strategies.","PeriodicalId":509137,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences","volume":"37 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14060168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the importance of conducting mass movement susceptibility mapping and hazard assessment using quantitative techniques, including machine learning, in the Northern Lima Commonwealth (NLC). A previous exploration of the topographic variables revealed a high correlation and multicollinearity among some of them, which led to dimensionality reduction through a principal component analysis (PCA). Six susceptibility models were generated using weights of evidence, logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, random forest, and naive Bayes methods to produce quantitative susceptibility maps and assess the hazard associated with two scenarios: the first being El Niño phenomenon and the second being an earthquake exceeding 8.8 Mw. The main findings indicate that machine learning models exhibit excellent predictive performance for the presence and absence of mass movement events, as all models surpassed an AUC value of >0.9, with the random forest model standing out. In terms of hazard levels, in the event of an El Niño phenomenon or an earthquake exceeding 8.8 Mw, approximately 40% and 35% respectively, of the NLC area would be exposed to the highest hazard levels. The importance of integrating methodologies in mass movement susceptibility models is also emphasized; these methodologies include the correlation analysis, multicollinearity assessment, dimensionality reduction of variables, and coupling statistical models with machine learning models to improve the predictive accuracy of machine learning models. The findings of this research are expected to serve as a supportive tool for land managers in formulating effective disaster prevention and risk reduction strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用定量机器学习技术对大规模迁移的易感性和危害性进行比较研究--案例研究:秘鲁利马联邦北部
本研究探讨了在利马联邦北部(NLC)使用定量技术(包括机器学习)进行大规模移动易感性绘图和危害评估的重要性。之前对地形变量的研究表明,其中一些变量之间存在高度相关性和多重共线性,因此需要通过主成分分析(PCA)进行降维。利用证据权重法、逻辑回归法、多层感知器法、支持向量机法、随机森林法和天真贝叶斯法生成了六个易感性模型,以生成定量易感性地图,并评估与两种情况相关的危害:第一种情况是厄尔尼诺现象,第二种情况是超过 8.8 Mw 的地震。主要研究结果表明,机器学习模型在预测是否存在大规模移动事件方面表现出色,所有模型的 AUC 值均大于 0.9,其中随机森林模型表现突出。就危害程度而言,如果发生厄尔尼诺现象或超过 8.8 兆瓦的地震,国家陆地中心地区将分别有约 40% 和 35% 面临最高危害程度。研究还强调了在质量移动易感性模型中整合各种方法的重要性;这些方法包括相关性分析、多重共线性评估、变量降维以及将统计模型与机器学习模型相结合,以提高机器学习模型的预测准确性。这项研究的结果有望成为土地管理者制定有效防灾和降低风险战略的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neural Network-Based Climate Prediction for the 21st Century Using the Finnish Multi-Millennial Tree-Ring Chronology Analysis of Debris Flow Protective Barriers Using the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian Method The Perspective of Using Neural Networks and Machine Learning Algorithms for Modelling and Forecasting the Quality Parameters of Coking Coal—A Case Study Identification and Verification of the Movement of the Hidden Active Fault Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Excavation A Unique Conditions Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1