Comparative Study of Thermodynamic Performances: Ammonia vs. Methanol SOFC for Marine Vessels

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Chemical Engineering & Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1002/ceat.202400118
Ph.D., Research Prof. Phan Anh Duong, Ph.D. Bo Rim Ryu, Ph.D. Tran The Nam, Ph.D. candidate Yoon Hyeok Lee, Ph.D. Jinwon Jung, Ph.D. Prof. Jin-Kwang Lee, Ph.D. Prof. Hokeun Kang
{"title":"Comparative Study of Thermodynamic Performances: Ammonia vs. Methanol SOFC for Marine Vessels","authors":"Ph.D., Research Prof. Phan Anh Duong,&nbsp;Ph.D. Bo Rim Ryu,&nbsp;Ph.D. Tran The Nam,&nbsp;Ph.D. candidate Yoon Hyeok Lee,&nbsp;Ph.D. Jinwon Jung,&nbsp;Ph.D. Prof. Jin-Kwang Lee,&nbsp;Ph.D. Prof. Hokeun Kang","doi":"10.1002/ceat.202400118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In response to escalating environmental concerns and the imperative to institute effective energy management strategies, the pursuit of alternative fuels has emerged as a pivotal endeavor for realizing sustainable energy solutions. Methanol and ammonia have surfaced as particularly promising and environmentally friendly liquid fuels, holding significant potential for aiding in the attainment of decarbonization objectives and addressing global energy requirements. This research proposes and scrutinizes a sophisticated cogeneration system integrating solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), gas turbine (GT), steam Rankine cycle, and organic Rankine cycle. Direct utilization of ammonia and methanol as fuel in this intricate system is examined, with the design and modeling facilitated through the utilization of Aspen HYSYS V.12.1. The thermodynamic performance of the proposed system is rigorously assessed by employing the foundational principles of the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The direct SOFCs fueled by ammonia and methanol exhibit notable energy efficiencies of 64.25 % and 58.42 %, respectively. Remarkably, the amalgamated systems showcase heightened energy efficiencies, witnessing a commendable increase of 12.64 % and 10.66 % when powered by ammonia and methanol, respectively, as compared to individual SOFC systems. Examination of exergy destruction reveals the SOFC as the principal contributor, with electrochemical and chemical processes constituting the primary sources of irreversibility. Additionally, explicit values for exergy destruction in the GT, afterburner, and heat exchanger components are provided. A comprehensive parametric study underscores the pivotal role of the fuel utilization factor (U<sub>f</sub>), identifying a value of 0.85 as optimal and significantly augmenting the thermodynamic efficiency of the system. This analysis not only substantiates the potential of ammonia and methanol as effective carriers for hydrogen but also underscores the efficacy of waste heat recovery as a viable strategy for enhancing the overall thermodynamic performance of an SOFC system. The findings presented herein contribute valuable insights, paving the way for the strategic utilization of alternative fuels and cogeneration systems in the broader context of sustainable and environmentally conscious energy solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10083,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ceat.202400118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to escalating environmental concerns and the imperative to institute effective energy management strategies, the pursuit of alternative fuels has emerged as a pivotal endeavor for realizing sustainable energy solutions. Methanol and ammonia have surfaced as particularly promising and environmentally friendly liquid fuels, holding significant potential for aiding in the attainment of decarbonization objectives and addressing global energy requirements. This research proposes and scrutinizes a sophisticated cogeneration system integrating solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), gas turbine (GT), steam Rankine cycle, and organic Rankine cycle. Direct utilization of ammonia and methanol as fuel in this intricate system is examined, with the design and modeling facilitated through the utilization of Aspen HYSYS V.12.1. The thermodynamic performance of the proposed system is rigorously assessed by employing the foundational principles of the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The direct SOFCs fueled by ammonia and methanol exhibit notable energy efficiencies of 64.25 % and 58.42 %, respectively. Remarkably, the amalgamated systems showcase heightened energy efficiencies, witnessing a commendable increase of 12.64 % and 10.66 % when powered by ammonia and methanol, respectively, as compared to individual SOFC systems. Examination of exergy destruction reveals the SOFC as the principal contributor, with electrochemical and chemical processes constituting the primary sources of irreversibility. Additionally, explicit values for exergy destruction in the GT, afterburner, and heat exchanger components are provided. A comprehensive parametric study underscores the pivotal role of the fuel utilization factor (Uf), identifying a value of 0.85 as optimal and significantly augmenting the thermodynamic efficiency of the system. This analysis not only substantiates the potential of ammonia and methanol as effective carriers for hydrogen but also underscores the efficacy of waste heat recovery as a viable strategy for enhancing the overall thermodynamic performance of an SOFC system. The findings presented herein contribute valuable insights, paving the way for the strategic utilization of alternative fuels and cogeneration systems in the broader context of sustainable and environmentally conscious energy solutions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热力学性能比较研究:船用氨与甲醇 SOFC 的热力学性能比较研究
为了应对不断升级的环境问题和制定有效能源管理战略的迫切需要,替代燃料的开发已成为实现可持续能源解决方案的关键努力。甲醇和氨已成为特别有前途的环保型液体燃料,在帮助实现去碳化目标和满足全球能源需求方面具有巨大潜力。本研究提出并仔细研究了一种复杂的热电联产系统,该系统集成了固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)、燃气轮机(GT)、蒸汽朗肯循环和有机朗肯循环。通过使用 Aspen HYSYS V.12.1 进行设计和建模,对在这一复杂系统中直接使用氨和甲醇作为燃料进行了研究。利用热力学第一和第二定律的基本原理,对拟议系统的热力学性能进行了严格评估。以氨和甲醇为燃料的直接 SOFC 的能效分别为 64.25% 和 58.42%。值得注意的是,与单个 SOFC 系统相比,以氨和甲醇为燃料的混合系统能效更高,分别提高了 12.64% 和 10.66%。对放能破坏的研究表明,SOFC 是主要的贡献者,而电化学和化学过程则是不可逆的主要来源。此外,还提供了 GT、后燃烧器和热交换器组件的明确的放能破坏值。一项全面的参数研究强调了燃料利用系数(Uf)的关键作用,确定 0.85 为最佳值,可显著提高系统的热力学效率。这项分析不仅证实了氨和甲醇作为氢气有效载体的潜力,还强调了余热回收作为提高 SOFC 系统整体热力学性能的可行策略的有效性。本文介绍的研究结果提供了宝贵的见解,为在可持续和环保能源解决方案的大背景下战略性地利用替代燃料和热电联产系统铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Chemical Engineering & Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
315
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: This is the journal for chemical engineers looking for first-hand information in all areas of chemical and process engineering. Chemical Engineering & Technology is: Competent with contributions written and refereed by outstanding professionals from around the world. Essential because it is an international forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Topical because its articles treat the very latest developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Cover Picture: Chem. Eng. Technol. 11/2024 Editorial Board: Chem. Eng. Technol. 11/2024 Overview Contents: Chem. Eng. Technol. 11/2024 Photoelectrochemical Technology for Solar Fuel: Green Hydrogen, Carbon Dioxide Capture, and Ammonia Production Cover Picture: Chem. Eng. Technol. 10/2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1