Information theory reveals physiological manifestations of COVID-19 that correlate with symptom density of illness

Jacob M. Ryan, Shreenithi Navaneethan, Natalie Damaso, Stephan Dilchert, W. Hartogensis, Joseph L. Natale, Frederick M. Hecht, Ashley Mason, Benjamin L. Smarr
{"title":"Information theory reveals physiological manifestations of COVID-19 that correlate with symptom density of illness","authors":"Jacob M. Ryan, Shreenithi Navaneethan, Natalie Damaso, Stephan Dilchert, W. Hartogensis, Joseph L. Natale, Frederick M. Hecht, Ashley Mason, Benjamin L. Smarr","doi":"10.3389/fnetp.2024.1211413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithms for the detection of COVID-19 illness from wearable sensor devices tend to implicitly treat the disease as causing a stereotyped (and therefore recognizable) deviation from healthy physiology. In contrast, a substantial diversity of bodily responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported in the clinical milieu. This raises the question of how to characterize the diversity of illness manifestations, and whether such characterization could reveal meaningful relationships across different illness manifestations. Here, we present a framework motivated by information theory to generate quantified maps of illness presentation, which we term “manifestations,” as resolved by continuous physiological data from a wearable device (Oura Ring). We test this framework on five physiological data streams (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, metabolic activity, and sleep temperature) assessed at the time of reported illness onset in a previously reported COVID-19-positive cohort (N = 73). We find that the number of distinct manifestations are few in this cohort, compared to the space of all possible manifestations. In addition, manifestation frequency correlates with the rough number of symptoms reported by a given individual, over a several-day period prior to their imputed onset of illness. These findings suggest that information-theoretic approaches can be used to sort COVID-19 illness manifestations into types with real-world value. This proof of concept supports the use of information-theoretic approaches to map illness manifestations from continuous physiological data. Such approaches could likely inform algorithm design and real-time treatment decisions if developed on large, diverse samples.","PeriodicalId":509566,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Network Physiology","volume":"37 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Network Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2024.1211413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithms for the detection of COVID-19 illness from wearable sensor devices tend to implicitly treat the disease as causing a stereotyped (and therefore recognizable) deviation from healthy physiology. In contrast, a substantial diversity of bodily responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported in the clinical milieu. This raises the question of how to characterize the diversity of illness manifestations, and whether such characterization could reveal meaningful relationships across different illness manifestations. Here, we present a framework motivated by information theory to generate quantified maps of illness presentation, which we term “manifestations,” as resolved by continuous physiological data from a wearable device (Oura Ring). We test this framework on five physiological data streams (heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, metabolic activity, and sleep temperature) assessed at the time of reported illness onset in a previously reported COVID-19-positive cohort (N = 73). We find that the number of distinct manifestations are few in this cohort, compared to the space of all possible manifestations. In addition, manifestation frequency correlates with the rough number of symptoms reported by a given individual, over a several-day period prior to their imputed onset of illness. These findings suggest that information-theoretic approaches can be used to sort COVID-19 illness manifestations into types with real-world value. This proof of concept supports the use of information-theoretic approaches to map illness manifestations from continuous physiological data. Such approaches could likely inform algorithm design and real-time treatment decisions if developed on large, diverse samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息理论揭示了与疾病症状密度相关的 COVID-19 生理表现
通过可穿戴传感设备检测 COVID-19 疾病的算法倾向于隐含地将该疾病视为造成与健康生理机能相背离的刻板印象(因此是可识别的)。与此相反,临床环境中对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的身体反应却呈现出极大的多样性。这就提出了一个问题:如何描述疾病表现的多样性,以及这种描述能否揭示不同疾病表现之间有意义的关系。在此,我们提出了一个以信息论为基础的框架,通过可穿戴设备(Oura Ring)提供的连续生理数据,生成疾病表现的量化图谱,我们称之为 "表现"。我们在先前报告的 COVID-19 阳性队列(N = 73)中,对报告发病时评估的五种生理数据流(心率、心率变异性、呼吸频率、代谢活动和睡眠温度)对这一框架进行了测试。我们发现,与所有可能表现的空间相比,该队列中不同表现的数量很少。此外,表现频率与特定个体在推测的发病前几天内报告的粗略症状数量相关。这些发现表明,信息理论方法可用于将 COVID-19 疾病表现分类为具有实际价值的类型。这一概念证明支持使用信息理论方法从连续的生理数据中绘制疾病表现图。如果在大量不同的样本中开发出这种方法,就有可能为算法设计和实时治疗决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Focal, generalized, or both: does generalized network involvement preclude successful epilepsy surgery? Mapping the strain-stiffening behavior of the lung and lung cancer at microscale resolution using the crystal ribcage Critical dynamics and interictal epileptiform discharge: a comparative analysis with respect to tracking seizure risk cycles Information theory reveals physiological manifestations of COVID-19 that correlate with symptom density of illness Strong delayed negative feedback
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1