Efficacy and harms associated with beta-blockers for cardiotoxicity in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Archives of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.5114/aoms/189501
Jessica T. Li, Amanda MM. Duddy, Michelle Cardona, V. Pasupuleti, Adrián V. Hernández
{"title":"Efficacy and harms associated with beta-blockers for cardiotoxicity in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jessica T. Li, Amanda MM. Duddy, Michelle Cardona, V. Pasupuleti, Adrián V. Hernández","doi":"10.5114/aoms/189501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma, anthracyclines are associated with early and late dose-related cardiotoxicity. We systematically evaluated efficacy and harms of the use of beta-blockers in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.We searched five engines, and pre-prints until October 10, 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter (LVEDD, LVESD), peak E’ velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, NT-pro BNP levels. Secondary outcome was heart rate. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, and we used GRADE methods to assess quality of evidence (QoE).Twelve RCTs were selected (n=1,794), seven RCTs evaluated carvedilol. Mean ages were 39 to 52 years-old, 88.5% were women; 79.4% had breast cancer, and 11.5% lymphoma. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.37, 12 RCTs, I2=0%, very low QoE), LVEF (MD 2.73%, 95%CI -0.45% to 5.92%, 12 RCTs, I2=93%, very low QoE), and heart rate (MD -9.14 bpm, 95%CI -15.02 to -3.26, two RCTs, I2=87%, very low QoE) vs. controls. Beta-blockers likely reduced NT-pro BNP levels slightly (MD -15.35 pg/mL, 95%CI -22.39 to -8.31, two RCTs, I2=0%, moderate QoE). There were no effects on other outcomes, all with very low QoE.Prophylactic use of beta-blockers for cardioprotection had little to no effect on all-cause mortality, LVEF or cardiac function outcomes in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy.","PeriodicalId":8278,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/189501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In patients with breast cancer and lymphoma, anthracyclines are associated with early and late dose-related cardiotoxicity. We systematically evaluated efficacy and harms of the use of beta-blockers in breast cancer and lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.We searched five engines, and pre-prints until October 10, 2022, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating beta-blockers for anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in breast cancer and lymphoma patients. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter (LVEDD, LVESD), peak E’ velocity, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, NT-pro BNP levels. Secondary outcome was heart rate. Inverse variance random effect meta-analyses were performed, and we used GRADE methods to assess quality of evidence (QoE).Twelve RCTs were selected (n=1,794), seven RCTs evaluated carvedilol. Mean ages were 39 to 52 years-old, 88.5% were women; 79.4% had breast cancer, and 11.5% lymphoma. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.37, 12 RCTs, I2=0%, very low QoE), LVEF (MD 2.73%, 95%CI -0.45% to 5.92%, 12 RCTs, I2=93%, very low QoE), and heart rate (MD -9.14 bpm, 95%CI -15.02 to -3.26, two RCTs, I2=87%, very low QoE) vs. controls. Beta-blockers likely reduced NT-pro BNP levels slightly (MD -15.35 pg/mL, 95%CI -22.39 to -8.31, two RCTs, I2=0%, moderate QoE). There were no effects on other outcomes, all with very low QoE.Prophylactic use of beta-blockers for cardioprotection had little to no effect on all-cause mortality, LVEF or cardiac function outcomes in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
β-受体阻滞剂对接受化疗的癌症患者心脏毒性的疗效和危害:系统综述和荟萃分析。
在乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者中,蒽环类药物与早期和晚期剂量相关的心脏毒性有关。我们系统地评估了在接受化疗的乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者中使用β-受体阻滞剂的疗效和危害。我们检索了五个引擎以及截至 2022 年 10 月 10 日的预印本,以寻找评估β-受体阻滞剂治疗乳腺癌和淋巴瘤患者蒽环类药物相关心脏毒性的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果为全因死亡率、左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期和收缩末期直径(LVEDD、LVESD)、E'峰值速度、E/A比值、E/e'比值、NT-pro BNP水平。次要结果为心率。我们进行了反方差随机效应荟萃分析,并采用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量(QoE)。我们选取了 12 项 RCT(n=1,794),其中 7 项 RCT 评估了卡维地洛。平均年龄为 39 至 52 岁,88.5% 为女性;79.4% 患有乳腺癌,11.5% 患有淋巴瘤。关于β-受体阻滞剂对全因死亡率(RR 0.87,95%CI 0.55 至 1.37,12 项 RCT,I2=0%,极低 QoE)、LVEF(MD 2.73%,95%CI -0.45% 至 5.92%,12 项 RCT,I2=93%,极低 QoE)、心率(MD -9.14 bpm,95%CI -15.02 至 -3.26,两项 RCT,I2=87%,极低 QoE)与对照组相比。β-受体阻滞剂可能会略微降低NT-pro BNP水平(MD -15.35 pg/mL,95%CI -22.39 to -8.31,两项RCT,I2=0%,中等QoE)。在接受蒽环类药物治疗的癌症患者中,预防性使用β受体阻滞剂进行心脏保护对全因死亡率、LVEF或心功能结果几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Medical Science
Archives of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
139
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Medical Science (AMS) publishes high quality original articles and reviews of recognized scientists that deal with all scientific medicine. AMS opens the possibilities for young, capable scientists. The journal would like to give them a chance to have a publication following matter-of-fact, professional review by outstanding, famous medical scientists. Thanks to that they will have an opportunity to present their study results and/or receive useful advice about the mistakes they have made so far. The second equally important aim is a presentation of review manuscripts of recognized scientists about the educational capacity, in order that young scientists, often at the beginning of their scientific carrier, could constantly deepen their medical knowledge and be up-to-date with current guidelines and trends in world-wide medicine. The fact that our educational articles are written by world-famous scientists determines their innovation and the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Medical errors can cost lives. Sanguiin inhibits cerebral hemorrhage in rats by protecting the blood-brain barrier. A comprehensive analysis of the role of cuproptosis in periodontitis through integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing. Association between air pollution and bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study. Polymorphism rs662 (Q192R) of paraoxonase-1 and susceptibility to atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1