Barriers and Facilitators of Taking a Lifestyle History and Referral to Lifestyle Interventions in Mental Health

L. Koomen, J. Deenik, W. Cahn
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Taking a Lifestyle History and Referral to Lifestyle Interventions in Mental Health","authors":"L. Koomen, J. Deenik, W. Cahn","doi":"10.1177/15598276241261670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lifestyle interventions can improve mental and physical health in patients with mental illness, but implementing these in clinical practice seems difficult. Purpose: Investigate barriers and facilitators for mental health professionals (MHPs) in taking lifestyle histories and referring to lifestyle interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional national online survey among MHPs. All mental health care institutions, hospital psychiatry departments, associations for nurse specialists, and independent working psychiatrists’ organizations in the Netherlands were invited to participate. Ordinal regression analyses were performed to study factors associated with barriers. Results: 1524 MHPs participated. Barriers were time constraints (45.3%), lack of referral possibilities (33.2%), patient disinterest (25.4%) and lack of knowledge about: effect (25.5%), availability of interventions (57.5%), lifestyle (16.9%), and reimbursement (41.5%). Facilitators included more referral possibilities (44.9%), integration of lifestyle into clinical routine (48.3%), a dedicated tool (41.5%), organizational commitment (41.2%) and lifestyle as standard treatment component (40.3%), and more knowledge about: referral possibilities (51.4%), effect (38.1%), and reimbursement (48.1%). Older MHPs, those who consider their own lifestyle important, and those working in organizations where lifestyle interventions are available experienced fewer barriers. Conclusions: Organizations should prioritize lifestyle psychiatry by educating staff, integration into clinical routine, and increasing the availability and reimbursements of interventions.","PeriodicalId":504008,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":"5 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276241261670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle interventions can improve mental and physical health in patients with mental illness, but implementing these in clinical practice seems difficult. Purpose: Investigate barriers and facilitators for mental health professionals (MHPs) in taking lifestyle histories and referring to lifestyle interventions. Methods: A cross-sectional national online survey among MHPs. All mental health care institutions, hospital psychiatry departments, associations for nurse specialists, and independent working psychiatrists’ organizations in the Netherlands were invited to participate. Ordinal regression analyses were performed to study factors associated with barriers. Results: 1524 MHPs participated. Barriers were time constraints (45.3%), lack of referral possibilities (33.2%), patient disinterest (25.4%) and lack of knowledge about: effect (25.5%), availability of interventions (57.5%), lifestyle (16.9%), and reimbursement (41.5%). Facilitators included more referral possibilities (44.9%), integration of lifestyle into clinical routine (48.3%), a dedicated tool (41.5%), organizational commitment (41.2%) and lifestyle as standard treatment component (40.3%), and more knowledge about: referral possibilities (51.4%), effect (38.1%), and reimbursement (48.1%). Older MHPs, those who consider their own lifestyle important, and those working in organizations where lifestyle interventions are available experienced fewer barriers. Conclusions: Organizations should prioritize lifestyle psychiatry by educating staff, integration into clinical routine, and increasing the availability and reimbursements of interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录生活方式史和转介精神健康生活方式干预的障碍和促进因素
背景:生活方式干预可改善精神疾病患者的身心健康,但在临床实践中实施这些干预似乎很难。目的:调查精神卫生专业人员(MHPs)在采集生活方式病史和转介生活方式干预时遇到的障碍和促进因素。方法对精神卫生专业人员进行横断面全国在线调查。荷兰的所有精神卫生保健机构、医院精神科、专科护士协会以及独立的精神科医生组织均受邀参与。对与障碍相关的因素进行了序列回归分析。结果:1524名精神科医生参与了研究。障碍因素包括时间限制(45.3%)、缺乏转诊机会(33.2%)、患者不感兴趣(25.4%)以及缺乏以下方面的知识:效果(25.5%)、干预措施的可用性(57.5%)、生活方式(16.9%)和报销(41.5%)。促进因素包括更多的转诊可能性(44.9%)、将生活方式纳入临床常规(48.3%)、专用工具(41.5%)、组织承诺(41.2%)和生活方式作为标准治疗组成部分(40.3%),以及对以下方面的更多了解:转诊可能性(51.4%)、效果(38.1%)和报销(48.1%)。年龄较大、认为自己的生活方式很重要以及在有生活方式干预措施的机构工作的医学保健人员遇到的障碍较少。结论:各机构应通过教育员工、将生活方式纳入临床常规以及增加干预措施的可用性和报销额度,优先考虑生活方式精神病学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Whole-Food Plant-Based Diet on Postprandial Sleepiness: A Pilot Study Barriers and Facilitators of Taking a Lifestyle History and Referral to Lifestyle Interventions in Mental Health Enhancing Healthcare Professionals’ Culinary Skills, Food Management, Counseling Confidence, and Mediterranean Diet Adherence Through a Culinary Medicine Boot Camp: A Pilot Implementation Program (PIP) Musculoskeletal Failure Lifestyle Intervention Improves Parasympathetic Activity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1