Single-Pass, Single-Stream Harvest of Corn Grain and Stover: a Comparison of Two Harvest Methods

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS BioEnergy Research Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s12155-024-10775-y
A.B. Hemmelgarn, K.J. Shinners, A.J. Timm, M.F. Digman
{"title":"Single-Pass, Single-Stream Harvest of Corn Grain and Stover: a Comparison of Two Harvest Methods","authors":"A.B. Hemmelgarn,&nbsp;K.J. Shinners,&nbsp;A.J. Timm,&nbsp;M.F. Digman","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10775-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The single-pass, split-stream harvest of corn grain and stover has been extensively studied. Challenges for these systems include the logistics and economics of handling separate grain and stover streams. Single-pass, single-stream processes have been explored using a self-propelled forage harvester to collect whole-plant corn as a biomass feedstock. However, due to the processing done by the self-propelled forage harvester, a significant portion of the grain fraction is damaged during harvest limiting its marketability. To evaluate an alternative system, a combine harvester was modified with a rear blower to collect corn stover, facilitating the collection of the grain and stover fractions into the same wagon, creating an aggregate, whole-plant corn material. Utilizing this system, a plot study was conducted to compare it to a self-propelled forage harvester. Parameters studied for system performance were yield, grain damage, and geometric mean particle size. While the combine system reduced grain damage (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) by 18 percentage points compared to the self-propelled forage harvester and had a similar whole plant particle size (<i>p</i> = 0.11), it collected 1.86 Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup> less biomass (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The combine harvester with a stover collection system provides a method to collect whole-plant corn as a biomass feedstock that maintains a large portion of the grain integrity but decreases dry matter yield.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"2158 - 2163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10775-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The single-pass, split-stream harvest of corn grain and stover has been extensively studied. Challenges for these systems include the logistics and economics of handling separate grain and stover streams. Single-pass, single-stream processes have been explored using a self-propelled forage harvester to collect whole-plant corn as a biomass feedstock. However, due to the processing done by the self-propelled forage harvester, a significant portion of the grain fraction is damaged during harvest limiting its marketability. To evaluate an alternative system, a combine harvester was modified with a rear blower to collect corn stover, facilitating the collection of the grain and stover fractions into the same wagon, creating an aggregate, whole-plant corn material. Utilizing this system, a plot study was conducted to compare it to a self-propelled forage harvester. Parameters studied for system performance were yield, grain damage, and geometric mean particle size. While the combine system reduced grain damage (p < 0.001) by 18 percentage points compared to the self-propelled forage harvester and had a similar whole plant particle size (p = 0.11), it collected 1.86 Mg DM ha−1 less biomass (p < 0.001). The combine harvester with a stover collection system provides a method to collect whole-plant corn as a biomass feedstock that maintains a large portion of the grain integrity but decreases dry matter yield.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米粒和秸秆的单程单流收割:两种收割方法的比较
对玉米谷物和秸秆的单程分流收割进行了广泛研究。这些系统面临的挑战包括分别处理谷物和秸秆流的物流和经济问题。单程单流工艺已被探索用于使用自走式牧草收割机收集全株玉米作为生物质原料。然而,由于自走式牧草收割机要进行加工,因此在收割过程中,谷物部分的很大一部分会受到损坏,从而限制了其销售能力。为了评估替代系统,对联合收割机进行了改装,安装了后鼓风机以收集玉米秸秆,从而便于将谷物和秸秆部分收集到同一车厢中,形成整体的全株玉米材料。利用该系统进行了一项小区研究,将其与自走式牧草收割机进行比较。研究的系统性能参数包括产量、谷物损伤和几何平均粒度。与自走式牧草收割机相比,联合收割机系统减少了 18 个百分点的谷粒损伤(p < 0.001),而且整株牧草的颗粒大小也相似(p = 0.11),但它收集的生物量却比自走式收割机少 1.86 兆克 DM ha-1(p < 0.001)。带有秸秆收集系统的联合收割机提供了一种收集整株玉米作为生物质原料的方法,这种方法可以保持大部分谷粒的完整性,但会降低干物质产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
期刊最新文献
Food Waste Ash Supported Nickel Catalyst to Steam Gasification of Food Waste for Enhanced Tar Reduction and Hydrogen Production Techno-Economic Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Chlorella vulgaris Using Different Potential Biorefinery Approaches Physicochemical and Energy Characteristics of Biochar and Hydrochar Derived from Cotton Stalks: A Comparative Study Biomass Gasification as a Viable Alternative for Small-scaled Combined Heat and Power Technologies in Remote Communities in Canada Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Solid Recovered Fuel from Food Waste and its Quality Prediction Using Linear Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1