Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Stretching in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Sumaira Yasmin, Nida Ilahi, Sania Naz, Hina Mustafa, Adeena Shams, Kinza Fatima, Mahnoor Najeeb, Anoosha Taskeen Javed, Areej Fatima
{"title":"Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Stretching in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Sumaira Yasmin, Nida Ilahi, Sania Naz, Hina Mustafa, Adeena Shams, Kinza Fatima, Mahnoor Najeeb, Anoosha Taskeen Javed, Areej Fatima","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4iicic1.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is characterized by widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and a range of psychosomatic symptoms. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as physical therapy, have shown promise in managing these symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling and stretching in reducing pain pressure thresholds, fatigue, and disability in fibromyalgia patients.\nObjective: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling and stretching in the treatment of fibromyalgia, specifically focusing on improvements in pain pressure thresholds, fatigue, and disability.\nMethods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 10 female participants aged 35-55 years, diagnosed with fibromyalgia and scoring over 60 on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (Stretching) and Group B (Dry-Needling). Each group received two treatment sessions over six months. The Stretching protocol involved static stretching of major muscle groups, while the Dry-Needling protocol involved the insertion of thin filiform needles into tender points. Both groups also received routine physical therapy, including hot packs and ultrasound therapy. Data were collected using the FIQ before and after the interventions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25, with significance set at p < 0.05.\nResults: Both groups showed significant improvements in FIQ scores after treatment. Group A (Stretching) had a mean pre-treatment FIQ score of 119.2 ± 11.0 and a post-treatment score of 105.8 ± 9.1 (p < 0.001). Group B (Dry-Needling) had a mean pre-treatment FIQ score of 120.8 ± 9.2 and a post-treatment score of 67.8 ± 4.0 (p < 0.001). The Dry-Needling group showed greater improvements across all measured parameters, including reductions in pain (t = 11.0, p < 0.001), fatigue (t = 14.0, p < 0.001), and sleep disturbances (t = 4.5, p = 0.010).\nConclusion: Both dry needling and stretching significantly reduced pain, fatigue, and disability in fibromyalgia patients, with dry needling demonstrating greater efficacy. These findings support the inclusion of dry needling as an effective non-pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia.\nKeywords: Fibromyalgia, Dry Needling, Stretching, Pain Management, Fatigue Reduction, Disability Improvement, Non-Pharmacological Treatment.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4iicic1.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is characterized by widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and a range of psychosomatic symptoms. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as physical therapy, have shown promise in managing these symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling and stretching in reducing pain pressure thresholds, fatigue, and disability in fibromyalgia patients. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling and stretching in the treatment of fibromyalgia, specifically focusing on improvements in pain pressure thresholds, fatigue, and disability. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 10 female participants aged 35-55 years, diagnosed with fibromyalgia and scoring over 60 on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (Stretching) and Group B (Dry-Needling). Each group received two treatment sessions over six months. The Stretching protocol involved static stretching of major muscle groups, while the Dry-Needling protocol involved the insertion of thin filiform needles into tender points. Both groups also received routine physical therapy, including hot packs and ultrasound therapy. Data were collected using the FIQ before and after the interventions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in FIQ scores after treatment. Group A (Stretching) had a mean pre-treatment FIQ score of 119.2 ± 11.0 and a post-treatment score of 105.8 ± 9.1 (p < 0.001). Group B (Dry-Needling) had a mean pre-treatment FIQ score of 120.8 ± 9.2 and a post-treatment score of 67.8 ± 4.0 (p < 0.001). The Dry-Needling group showed greater improvements across all measured parameters, including reductions in pain (t = 11.0, p < 0.001), fatigue (t = 14.0, p < 0.001), and sleep disturbances (t = 4.5, p = 0.010). Conclusion: Both dry needling and stretching significantly reduced pain, fatigue, and disability in fibromyalgia patients, with dry needling demonstrating greater efficacy. These findings support the inclusion of dry needling as an effective non-pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia. Keywords: Fibromyalgia, Dry Needling, Stretching, Pain Management, Fatigue Reduction, Disability Improvement, Non-Pharmacological Treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干针疗法和拉伸疗法对纤维肌痛的疗效:随机临床试验
背景:纤维肌痛综合征(FM)的特征是广泛的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛、疲劳、睡眠障碍和一系列心身症状。物理疗法等非药物疗法已显示出控制这些症状的前景。本研究旨在评估干针疗法和拉伸疗法在降低纤维肌痛患者疼痛压力阈值、疲劳和残疾程度方面的效果:比较干针疗法和拉伸疗法对纤维肌痛的治疗效果,特别是对疼痛压力阈值、疲劳和残疾的改善效果:对 10 名年龄在 35-55 岁之间、被诊断患有纤维肌痛且纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)得分超过 60 分的女性参与者进行了随机临床试验。参与者被随机分配到两组:A 组(拉伸)和 B 组(干针)。每组在六个月内接受两次治疗。拉伸疗法包括对主要肌肉群进行静态拉伸,而干针疗法则是将细长的丝状针插入穴位。两组患者还接受了常规物理治疗,包括热敷和超声波治疗。干预前后的数据均通过 FIQ 收集。使用 SPSS 25 版进行统计分析,显著性以 p < 0.05 为标准:两组治疗后的 FIQ 评分均有明显改善。A 组(拉伸)治疗前的 FIQ 平均得分为 119.2 ± 11.0,治疗后得分为 105.8 ± 9.1(P < 0.001)。B组(干针刺法)治疗前的平均FIQ为(120.8 ± 9.2)分,治疗后的平均FIQ为(67.8 ± 4.0)分(P < 0.001)。干针组在所有测量参数上都有较大改善,包括疼痛减轻(t = 11.0,p < 0.001)、疲劳减轻(t = 14.0,p < 0.001)和睡眠障碍减轻(t = 4.5,p = 0.010):结论:干针疗法和拉伸疗法都能明显减轻纤维肌痛患者的疼痛、疲劳和残疾,其中干针疗法的疗效更好。这些研究结果支持将干针疗法作为治疗纤维肌痛的有效非药物疗法:纤维肌痛、干针疗法、拉伸、疼痛管理、减轻疲劳、改善残疾、非药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Trace Elements in Pregnant Women with Malaria: A Case-Control Study Tissue Ablation Using Lasers: A Case Series Thirty-year Trend of Non-rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease: A Comparison of Pakistan with South Asia and Global Scenario A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Impact of Routine Case Volume on Door-to-Device Time for Primary PCI Patients: The Concept of a Designated Primary PCI Cath Lab at a Large Volume Cardiac Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1