A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Sania Maqbool, Muntaha Irshad, Mehr Un Nisa, Rashida Munir, Muhammad Farooqi, Muazzem Nasir, Muhammad Ahmad, Sana Gohar, Jaazba Asif, Suman Akram, Hina Arshad, Karam Idrees, Maryam Khan, Rimsha Rasheed, Farzand Ali
{"title":"A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy","authors":"Sania Maqbool, Muntaha Irshad, Mehr Un Nisa, Rashida Munir, Muhammad Farooqi, Muazzem Nasir, Muhammad Ahmad, Sana Gohar, Jaazba Asif, Suman Akram, Hina Arshad, Karam Idrees, Maryam Khan, Rimsha Rasheed, Farzand Ali","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes that can lead to significant balance issues, increasing the risk of falls and associated morbidity. Exercise is known to mitigate these complications, yet the comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities remains underexplored.\nObjective: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise training compared to balance training and traditional balance exercises in improving balance among patients with DPN.\nMethods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, with 60 patients diagnosed with DPN, divided equally into three groups: Group A (aerobic exercise), Group B (balance training), and Group C (traditional balance exercises). Each group received interventions three times weekly for four weeks. Balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) pre- and post-intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA to evaluate treatment effects.\nResults: Post-treatment BBS scores showed significant improvement across all groups (p < 0.001). Group A exhibited the greatest improvement, with mean scores increasing from 47.20 to 52.65. Group B's scores increased from 43.95 to 48.25, while Group C showed the least improvement, from 43.95 to 46.80.\nConclusion: Aerobic exercise significantly enhances balance in DPN patients compared to balance training and traditional exercises, highlighting its potential as a primary intervention strategy.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes that can lead to significant balance issues, increasing the risk of falls and associated morbidity. Exercise is known to mitigate these complications, yet the comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities remains underexplored. Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of aerobic exercise training compared to balance training and traditional balance exercises in improving balance among patients with DPN. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, with 60 patients diagnosed with DPN, divided equally into three groups: Group A (aerobic exercise), Group B (balance training), and Group C (traditional balance exercises). Each group received interventions three times weekly for four weeks. Balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) pre- and post-intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA to evaluate treatment effects. Results: Post-treatment BBS scores showed significant improvement across all groups (p < 0.001). Group A exhibited the greatest improvement, with mean scores increasing from 47.20 to 52.65. Group B's scores increased from 43.95 to 48.25, while Group C showed the least improvement, from 43.95 to 46.80. Conclusion: Aerobic exercise significantly enhances balance in DPN patients compared to balance training and traditional exercises, highlighting its potential as a primary intervention strategy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有氧运动训练和平衡训练对糖尿病周围神经病变患者平衡能力影响的随机对照研究
背景:糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)是糖尿病的一种常见并发症,可导致严重的平衡问题,增加跌倒风险和相关发病率。众所周知,运动可减轻这些并发症,但不同运动方式的比较效果仍未得到充分探索:本研究旨在评估有氧运动训练与平衡训练和传统平衡训练相比,在改善 DPN 患者平衡能力方面的效果:方法:拉合尔梅奥医院进行了一项随机对照试验,将 60 名确诊为 DPN 的患者平均分为三组:A 组(有氧运动)、B 组(平衡训练)和 C 组(传统平衡训练)。每组每周接受三次干预,为期四周。采用伯格平衡量表(BBS)对干预前后的平衡能力进行评估。数据采用 SPSS 25 版进行分析,并使用配对 t 检验和单因素方差分析来评估治疗效果:各组治疗后的 BBS 评分均有显著改善(P < 0.001)。A 组的改善幅度最大,平均得分从 47.20 上升至 52.65。B 组的得分从 43.95 分提高到 48.25 分,而 C 组的得分从 43.95 分提高到 46.80 分,提高幅度最小:与平衡训练和传统运动相比,有氧运动能明显增强 DPN 患者的平衡能力,凸显了其作为主要干预策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Trace Elements in Pregnant Women with Malaria: A Case-Control Study Tissue Ablation Using Lasers: A Case Series Thirty-year Trend of Non-rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease: A Comparison of Pakistan with South Asia and Global Scenario A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Impact of Routine Case Volume on Door-to-Device Time for Primary PCI Patients: The Concept of a Designated Primary PCI Cath Lab at a Large Volume Cardiac Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1