The impact of openings on ferrocement I-beams: a study on metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcement

G. Hekal, A. Elshaboury, Y. B. I. Shaheen
{"title":"The impact of openings on ferrocement I-beams: a study on metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcement","authors":"G. Hekal, A. Elshaboury, Y. B. I. Shaheen","doi":"10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the influence of openings on the structural performance of ferrocement I-beams, incorporating diverse metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcements. Sixteen beams underwent testing utilizing a four-point loading system until failure, categorized into four groups based on the type of mesh reinforcement. Each group comprised a control I-beam without openings and three additional beams featuring one, two, and three openings, respectively. To ensure consistent reinforcement weight, the four groups were reinforced with three layers of welded steel meshes, two layers of expanded metal meshes, two layers of Tensar meshes, and eight layers of Gavazzi meshes. Comparative analysis of the experimental outcomes was conducted with finite element models utilizing Abaqus. Therefore, there was good agreement between the experimental and numerical results. The findings showed that beams with no openings, one, and two openings reinforced with Gavazzi meshes had the highest ultimate load compared to other tested beams, while beams with three openings, those reinforced with expanded metal meshes had the greatest ultimate loads. Placing three openings in beams, with dimensions of 100×50 mm (two of these openings are approximately 10 cm apart from each edge while the third opening is located at mid-span), reduced the load-to-weight ratio by about 20.7%, 12.9%, 8.2%, and 23.8% for welded beams, expanded beams, Tensar beams, and Gavazzi beams, respectively, compared to the beams with no openings.","PeriodicalId":488560,"journal":{"name":"Challenge journal of concrete research letters","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge journal of concrete research letters","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the influence of openings on the structural performance of ferrocement I-beams, incorporating diverse metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcements. Sixteen beams underwent testing utilizing a four-point loading system until failure, categorized into four groups based on the type of mesh reinforcement. Each group comprised a control I-beam without openings and three additional beams featuring one, two, and three openings, respectively. To ensure consistent reinforcement weight, the four groups were reinforced with three layers of welded steel meshes, two layers of expanded metal meshes, two layers of Tensar meshes, and eight layers of Gavazzi meshes. Comparative analysis of the experimental outcomes was conducted with finite element models utilizing Abaqus. Therefore, there was good agreement between the experimental and numerical results. The findings showed that beams with no openings, one, and two openings reinforced with Gavazzi meshes had the highest ultimate load compared to other tested beams, while beams with three openings, those reinforced with expanded metal meshes had the greatest ultimate loads. Placing three openings in beams, with dimensions of 100×50 mm (two of these openings are approximately 10 cm apart from each edge while the third opening is located at mid-span), reduced the load-to-weight ratio by about 20.7%, 12.9%, 8.2%, and 23.8% for welded beams, expanded beams, Tensar beams, and Gavazzi beams, respectively, compared to the beams with no openings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开口对铁水泥工字钢的影响:关于金属和非金属网加固的研究
这项研究的主要目的是评估开孔对铁水泥工字钢结构性能的影响,铁水泥工字钢采用了不同的金属和非金属网状加固材料。16 根梁通过四点加载系统进行了测试,直至失效,根据网状加固的类型分为四组。每组包括一个不带开口的对照工字钢和三个分别带有一个、两个和三个开口的附加工字钢。为确保加固重量一致,四组分别使用了三层焊接钢网、两层金属膨胀网、两层 Tensar 网和八层 Gavazzi 网进行加固。实验结果与利用 Abaqus 建立的有限元模型进行了对比分析。因此,实验结果与数值结果非常吻合。研究结果表明,与其他测试的横梁相比,无开口、有一个和两个开口并用 Gavazzi 网加固的横梁具有最高的极限荷载,而有三个开口并用膨胀金属网加固的横梁具有最大的极限荷载。与没有开口的梁相比,在尺寸为 100×50 毫米的梁上开三个开口(其中两个开口与每个边缘相距约 10 厘米,第三个开口位于跨中),焊接梁、膨胀梁、Tensar 梁和 Gavazzi 梁的荷重比分别降低了约 20.7%、12.9%、8.2% 和 23.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of resin amount on the damping properties of polymer concrete Predicting compressive strength of AAC blocks through machine learning advancements The impact of openings on ferrocement I-beams: a study on metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1