The Three Careers of the Solemn League and Covenant: Presbyterianism and Scottish Religious Diversity, 1643–1800

Alasdair Raffe
{"title":"The Three Careers of the Solemn League and Covenant: Presbyterianism and Scottish Religious Diversity, 1643–1800","authors":"Alasdair Raffe","doi":"10.1093/ehr/ceae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the changing significance of the Solemn League and Covenant in the century and a half following its negotiation by the parliamentary regimes of England and Scotland in 1643. The Solemn League had three careers. Until the late 1640s, it was the basis for an Anglo-Scottish alliance. But by the 1660s, Scottish Presbyterians conceived of the Solemn League’s religious commitments as binding particularly in Scotland, rather than across the three Stuart kingdoms. Well into the eighteenth century, the Solemn League continued to constrain the attitudes and behaviour of large numbers of conscientious Scottish Presbyterians. In its third career, however, Scots understood the Solemn League more historically than constitutionally. They revered its seventeenth-century adherents, even as they criticised the Solemn League’s terms and objectives. Though previous scholars have explored each of the Solemn League’s three careers, the transitions between them are not well understood. This article reconstructs the ways in which Scots rethought the Solemn League from the late 1640s to the early 1660s, to explain how its first career gave way to its second. The article then analyses a series of mid- and late eighteenth-century debates about the Solemn League. The more historical and critical perspectives on the Solemn League associated with its third career emerged from disputes within the Church of Scotland and rivalry between its ministers and members of new dissenting Presbyterian Churches. By tracing changes in how the Solemn League was understood, therefore, the article comments on the growth of religious diversity in Scotland.","PeriodicalId":507076,"journal":{"name":"The English Historical Review","volume":"50 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The English Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceae056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the changing significance of the Solemn League and Covenant in the century and a half following its negotiation by the parliamentary regimes of England and Scotland in 1643. The Solemn League had three careers. Until the late 1640s, it was the basis for an Anglo-Scottish alliance. But by the 1660s, Scottish Presbyterians conceived of the Solemn League’s religious commitments as binding particularly in Scotland, rather than across the three Stuart kingdoms. Well into the eighteenth century, the Solemn League continued to constrain the attitudes and behaviour of large numbers of conscientious Scottish Presbyterians. In its third career, however, Scots understood the Solemn League more historically than constitutionally. They revered its seventeenth-century adherents, even as they criticised the Solemn League’s terms and objectives. Though previous scholars have explored each of the Solemn League’s three careers, the transitions between them are not well understood. This article reconstructs the ways in which Scots rethought the Solemn League from the late 1640s to the early 1660s, to explain how its first career gave way to its second. The article then analyses a series of mid- and late eighteenth-century debates about the Solemn League. The more historical and critical perspectives on the Solemn League associated with its third career emerged from disputes within the Church of Scotland and rivalry between its ministers and members of new dissenting Presbyterian Churches. By tracing changes in how the Solemn League was understood, therefore, the article comments on the growth of religious diversity in Scotland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
庄严盟约的三次职业生涯:长老会与苏格兰宗教多样性,1643-1800 年
本文探讨了《庄严同盟与盟约》在英格兰和苏格兰议会政权于 1643 年谈判达成后的一个半世纪中不断变化的意义。庄严盟约》有三段历史。直到 16 世纪 40 年代末,它一直是英苏联盟的基础。但到了 16 世纪 60 年代,苏格兰长老会认为《庄严同盟》的宗教承诺只对苏格兰具有约束力,而不是对斯图亚特三大王国具有约束力。一直到 18 世纪,庄严联盟仍在约束着大量有良知的苏格兰长老会成员的态度和行为。然而,苏格兰人对《庄严同盟》的理解更多的是历史性的,而不是宪法性的。他们崇敬十七世纪的盟主,同时也批评庄严同盟的条款和目标。尽管之前的学者对庄严联盟的三个职业生涯都进行了探讨,但对它们之间的过渡却不甚了解。本文重构了苏格兰人从 16 世纪 40 年代末到 16 世纪 60 年代初重新思考《庄严同盟》的方式,以解释其第一阶段如何让位于第二阶段。文章随后分析了 18 世纪中后期有关《庄严同盟》的一系列争论。关于《庄严同盟》的更具历史性和批判性的观点与它的第三次生涯有关,这些观点源于苏格兰教会内部的争论以及苏格兰教会牧师与新的持不同政见的长老会成员之间的竞争。因此,通过追溯人们对《庄严同盟》理解的变化,文章对苏格兰宗教多样性的增长进行了评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prisons on the Edge: Perspectives on the Late Medieval and Early Modern History of Confinement in the Francosphere Imperial Powers and Humanitarian Interventions: The Zanzibar Sultanate, Britain, and France in the Indian Ocean, 1862–1905, by Raphaël Cheriau Black Students in Imperial Britain: The African Institute, Colwyn Bay, 1889–1911, by Robert Burroughs New Crusade: The Royal Navy and British Navalism, 1884–1914, by Bradley Cesario Bones and Bodies: How South African Scientists Studied Race, by Alan G. Morris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1