Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement

Joseph B. Bullock
{"title":"Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement","authors":"Joseph B. Bullock","doi":"10.1515/agph-2023-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pyrrhonian skeptics, according to Sextus Empiricus, suspend judgment in the face of equally strong oppositions, but they also continue to investigate. This joint characterization has puzzled scholars: Why keep investigating if the evidence demands epochē? On this point, Sextus has been accused of muddled thinking at best and incoherence at worst. In this paper, I explain how investigative activity harmonizes with the suspensive mindset. My interpretation helps to explain several puzzling features of Pyrrhonian philosophy in addition to the idea that one can both suspend judgment and continue investigating.","PeriodicalId":517350,"journal":{"name":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","volume":"38 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2023-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pyrrhonian skeptics, according to Sextus Empiricus, suspend judgment in the face of equally strong oppositions, but they also continue to investigate. This joint characterization has puzzled scholars: Why keep investigating if the evidence demands epochē? On this point, Sextus has been accused of muddled thinking at best and incoherence at worst. In this paper, I explain how investigative activity harmonizes with the suspensive mindset. My interpretation helps to explain several puzzling features of Pyrrhonian philosophy in addition to the idea that one can both suspend judgment and continue investigating.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对分歧时的怀疑悬念
摘要 根据塞克斯图斯-恩比里克斯(Sextus Empiricus)的说法,皮罗农怀疑论者在面对同样强烈的反对意见时会暂停判断,但他们也会继续研究。学者们对这一共同特征感到困惑:如果证据要求划时代,为什么还要继续调查?在这一点上,塞克斯图斯充其量被指责为思维混乱,最坏的情况是语无伦次。在本文中,我将解释调查活动如何与悬疑思维相协调。我的解释有助于解释皮罗哲学的几个令人费解的特点,以及一个人既能暂停判断又能继续探究的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lane, Melissa. Of Rule and Office: Plato’s Ideas of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2023, xi + 480 pp. Segev, Mor. The Value of the World and of Oneself: Philosophical Optimism and Pessimism from Aristotle to Modernity. New York: Oxford University Press 2022, xii + 272 pp. Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement Socrates on Cookery and Rhetoric Between Revolution and Reaction: The Political Significance of Kant’s Doctrine of the Idea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1