Developing the skills for complex thinking research: a case study using social robotics to produce scientific papers

E. López-Caudana, Carlos Enrique George-Reyes, Raidell Avello-Martínez
{"title":"Developing the skills for complex thinking research: a case study using social robotics to produce scientific papers","authors":"E. López-Caudana, Carlos Enrique George-Reyes, Raidell Avello-Martínez","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2024.1322727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of university students’ skills to successfully produce scientific documents has been a recurring topic of study in academia. This paper analyzes the implementation of a training experience using a digital environment mediated by video content materials starring humanoid robots. The research aimed to scale complex thinking and its sub-competencies as a hinge to strengthen basic academic research skills. Students from Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico committed to preparing a scientific document as part of their professional training participated. A pretest to know their initial level of perception, a posttest to evaluate if there was a change, and a scientific document the students delivered at the end of the training experience comprised the methodology to demonstrate the improvement of their skills. The results indicated students’ perceived improvement in the sub-competencies of systemic, creative, scientific, and innovative thinking; however, their perceptions did not align with that of the tutor who reviewed the delivered scientific product. The conclusion was that although the training experience helped strengthen the students’ skills, variables that are determinants for a student to develop the knowledge necessary to prepare scientific documents and their derived products remain to be analyzed.","PeriodicalId":508739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"25 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1322727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of university students’ skills to successfully produce scientific documents has been a recurring topic of study in academia. This paper analyzes the implementation of a training experience using a digital environment mediated by video content materials starring humanoid robots. The research aimed to scale complex thinking and its sub-competencies as a hinge to strengthen basic academic research skills. Students from Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico committed to preparing a scientific document as part of their professional training participated. A pretest to know their initial level of perception, a posttest to evaluate if there was a change, and a scientific document the students delivered at the end of the training experience comprised the methodology to demonstrate the improvement of their skills. The results indicated students’ perceived improvement in the sub-competencies of systemic, creative, scientific, and innovative thinking; however, their perceptions did not align with that of the tutor who reviewed the delivered scientific product. The conclusion was that although the training experience helped strengthen the students’ skills, variables that are determinants for a student to develop the knowledge necessary to prepare scientific documents and their derived products remain to be analyzed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养复杂思维研究技能:利用社交机器人技术撰写科学论文的案例研究
培养大学生成功制作科学文献的技能一直是学术界反复研究的课题。本文分析了以仿人机器人主演的视频内容材料为媒介的数字环境培训体验的实施情况。该研究旨在扩展复杂思维及其子能力,以此作为加强基本学术研究技能的铰链。来自哥伦比亚、厄瓜多尔和墨西哥的学生参加了这项活动,他们致力于编写一份科学文件,作为其专业培训的一部分。通过前测了解学生的初始认知水平,通过后测评估学生的认知是否发生了变化,以及学生在培训结束时提交的科学文献,这些都是证明学生技能提高的方法。结果表明,学生们认为自己在系统性思维、创造性思维、科学思维和创新思维等子能力方面有所提高;然而,他们的看法与审查所提交科学产品的导师的看法并不一致。结论是,尽管培训经历有助于增强学生的技能,但学生在编写科学文件及其衍生产品时,其知识发展的决定性变量仍有待分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future skills for Industry 4.0 integration and innovative learning for continuing engineering education Enhancing institutional integration and enjoyment among Saudi female physical education students: exploring the mediation of motivation and psychological needs satisfaction Scientific creativity in secondary students and its relationship with STEM-related attitudes, engagement and work intentions Instructor enthusiasm in online lectures: how vocal enthusiasm impacts student engagement, learning, and memory Flipping the anatomy classroom: a comparative analysis of 16-week and 8-week courses in a community college
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1