Flipping the anatomy classroom: a comparative analysis of 16-week and 8-week courses in a community college

Chaya Gopalan, Elizabeth L. Bruno, Sheyenne Daughrity, Kim-Leiloni T. Nguyen
{"title":"Flipping the anatomy classroom: a comparative analysis of 16-week and 8-week courses in a community college","authors":"Chaya Gopalan, Elizabeth L. Bruno, Sheyenne Daughrity, Kim-Leiloni T. Nguyen","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2024.1389825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using flipped teaching modality, a student-centered approach, in community college courses remains an understudied area. This study explored the effectiveness of unflipped (UF), partially flipped (PF), and fully flipped (FF) teaching formats within the confines of an accelerated 8-week Introduction to Human Anatomy course at a community college. The purpose of this study was to examine flipped teaching in an accelerated anatomy course by comparing final examination scores between the UF, PF, and FF modalities, compare the effectiveness of flipped teaching between a regular (16-week) and an accelerated anatomy course, evaluate the effect of different teaching modalities on male and female students between a regular and an accelerated course; and examine UF, PF, and FF among the above-median and the below-median students. Students in the FF sections were required to read relevant chapter(s) in the textbook and review slides before class. Students in the PF sections were required to read the textbook and slides for 25% of the chapters. All students took the same final exams and similar section exams. Final exam scores were higher in the regular 16-week course than in the 8-week course for UF (p = 0.0219) and PF (p = 0.0183) modalities. The 16-week course had higher final examination scores (p = 0.0492; n = 65) than the 8-week course. Male students scored lower in the 8-week FF course (49.42 ± 13.72) than in the 8-week PF (p = 0.006) and 16-week FF (p = 0.0008) formats and also compared to female students in the 8-week FF course (p = 0.0121). Above-median students in the 8-week course had significantly lower scores in the FF modality (71.35 ± 7.01) compared to PF (80.92 ± 5.30) (p = 0.009). Below-median students in the 8-week course had lower scores in the FF modality (52.25 ± 11.48) compared to UF (p = 0.0113) and PF (p = 0.04). In conclusion, FF in a 16-week anatomy course resulted in higher final exam scores than in the 8-week course. The 8-week FF format affected male student scores. Both above- and below-median groups experienced similar effects when exposed to FF within the accelerated course. Further investigations are essential to inform the refinement of flipped teaching methodologies in community colleges, particularly in the context of accelerated courses.","PeriodicalId":508739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1389825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using flipped teaching modality, a student-centered approach, in community college courses remains an understudied area. This study explored the effectiveness of unflipped (UF), partially flipped (PF), and fully flipped (FF) teaching formats within the confines of an accelerated 8-week Introduction to Human Anatomy course at a community college. The purpose of this study was to examine flipped teaching in an accelerated anatomy course by comparing final examination scores between the UF, PF, and FF modalities, compare the effectiveness of flipped teaching between a regular (16-week) and an accelerated anatomy course, evaluate the effect of different teaching modalities on male and female students between a regular and an accelerated course; and examine UF, PF, and FF among the above-median and the below-median students. Students in the FF sections were required to read relevant chapter(s) in the textbook and review slides before class. Students in the PF sections were required to read the textbook and slides for 25% of the chapters. All students took the same final exams and similar section exams. Final exam scores were higher in the regular 16-week course than in the 8-week course for UF (p = 0.0219) and PF (p = 0.0183) modalities. The 16-week course had higher final examination scores (p = 0.0492; n = 65) than the 8-week course. Male students scored lower in the 8-week FF course (49.42 ± 13.72) than in the 8-week PF (p = 0.006) and 16-week FF (p = 0.0008) formats and also compared to female students in the 8-week FF course (p = 0.0121). Above-median students in the 8-week course had significantly lower scores in the FF modality (71.35 ± 7.01) compared to PF (80.92 ± 5.30) (p = 0.009). Below-median students in the 8-week course had lower scores in the FF modality (52.25 ± 11.48) compared to UF (p = 0.0113) and PF (p = 0.04). In conclusion, FF in a 16-week anatomy course resulted in higher final exam scores than in the 8-week course. The 8-week FF format affected male student scores. Both above- and below-median groups experienced similar effects when exposed to FF within the accelerated course. Further investigations are essential to inform the refinement of flipped teaching methodologies in community colleges, particularly in the context of accelerated courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻转解剖学课堂:社区学院 16 周和 8 周课程的比较分析
在社区大学课程中使用翻转教学模式(一种以学生为中心的教学方法)仍是一个研究不足的领域。本研究探讨了在一所社区学院为期8周的人体解剖学概论速成课程中,非翻转(UF)、部分翻转(PF)和完全翻转(FF)教学模式的有效性。本研究的目的是通过比较 UF、PF 和 FF 模式的期末考试成绩来考察速成解剖学课程中的翻转教学,比较常规(16 周)和速成解剖学课程中翻转教学的效果,评估常规和速成课程中不同教学模式对男女学生的影响,并考察中等以上和中等以下学生的 UF、PF 和 FF 情况。FF 部分的学生被要求在课前阅读教科书中的相关章节并复习幻灯片。PF组的学生被要求阅读课本和25%章节的幻灯片。所有学生都参加了相同的期末考试和类似的分科考试。在 UF(p = 0.0219)和 PF(p = 0.0183)模式下,16 周常规课程的期末考试分数高于 8 周课程。16 周课程的期末考试分数(p = 0.0492;n = 65)高于 8 周课程。与 8 周 PF(p = 0.006)和 16 周 FF(p = 0.0008)课程相比,8 周 FF 课程的男生得分较低(49.42 ± 13.72),与 8 周 FF 课程的女生相比,男生得分也较低(p = 0.0121)。与 PF(80.92 ± 5.30)相比,中位数以上的 8 周课程学生在 FF 模式中的得分(71.35 ± 7.01)明显较低(p = 0.009)。与 UF(p = 0.0113)和 PF(p = 0.04)相比,8 周课程中低于中等水平的学生在 FF 模式(52.25 ± 11.48)中得分较低。总之,16 周解剖学课程中的 FF 比 8 周课程的期末考试分数高。8 周的 FF 形式影响了男生的分数。在速成课程中,中位数以上和中位数以下两组学生在接触 FF 时都受到了类似的影响。进一步的调查对完善社区学院的翻转教学方法至关重要,尤其是在速成课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future skills for Industry 4.0 integration and innovative learning for continuing engineering education Enhancing institutional integration and enjoyment among Saudi female physical education students: exploring the mediation of motivation and psychological needs satisfaction Scientific creativity in secondary students and its relationship with STEM-related attitudes, engagement and work intentions Instructor enthusiasm in online lectures: how vocal enthusiasm impacts student engagement, learning, and memory Flipping the anatomy classroom: a comparative analysis of 16-week and 8-week courses in a community college
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1