Normalizing Abnormal Psychology: An Anti-Ableist Approach

Meghan B. Owenz, Deniz Aydemir-Döke, D. B. Spencer
{"title":"Normalizing Abnormal Psychology: An Anti-Ableist Approach","authors":"Meghan B. Owenz, Deniz Aydemir-Döke, D. B. Spencer","doi":"10.1177/00986283241259744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey course of mental health diagnoses is a commonly taken undergraduate psychology course and presents a critical opportunity for addressing ableism in psychology. The presentation of mental health diagnoses is wrought with ableist beliefs, both in the historical and contemporary context. These ableist beliefs are a prime driver of stigma and its associated outcomes including worse mental health and avoidance of treatment professionals. The present article presents the ableist context of the course typically titled, “Abnormal Psychology,” and offers an alternative: the building of an anti-ableist curriculum grounded in disability studies. We use the social model of disability and disability identity as guiding principles, while inquiry-based learning is the pedagogical driver. We review six practical strategies, which include introducing the social model, renaming the class, starting with positive disability identity, complicating the continuum-categorical dichotomy, centering disability representation, and emphasizing consumer rights and direction. By leaning on disability studies and Mad Pride, “Abnormal Psychology” can deconstruct its ableist roots and be the foundation for a destigmatized, positive approach towards the study of psychological disorders. We offer future directions, including potential ways to continually assess anti-ableist efforts.","PeriodicalId":506822,"journal":{"name":"Teaching of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241259744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A survey course of mental health diagnoses is a commonly taken undergraduate psychology course and presents a critical opportunity for addressing ableism in psychology. The presentation of mental health diagnoses is wrought with ableist beliefs, both in the historical and contemporary context. These ableist beliefs are a prime driver of stigma and its associated outcomes including worse mental health and avoidance of treatment professionals. The present article presents the ableist context of the course typically titled, “Abnormal Psychology,” and offers an alternative: the building of an anti-ableist curriculum grounded in disability studies. We use the social model of disability and disability identity as guiding principles, while inquiry-based learning is the pedagogical driver. We review six practical strategies, which include introducing the social model, renaming the class, starting with positive disability identity, complicating the continuum-categorical dichotomy, centering disability representation, and emphasizing consumer rights and direction. By leaning on disability studies and Mad Pride, “Abnormal Psychology” can deconstruct its ableist roots and be the foundation for a destigmatized, positive approach towards the study of psychological disorders. We offer future directions, including potential ways to continually assess anti-ableist efforts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使异常心理学正常化:反赞成主义方法
心理健康诊断调查课程是一门常见的本科心理学课程,它为解决心理学中的能力歧视问题提供了一个重要的机会。无论是在历史上还是在当代背景下,心理健康诊断的表述都充满了能力主义信念。这些全能主义信念是污名化及其相关结果(包括心理健康恶化和回避专业治疗人员)的主要驱动力。本文介绍了典型的 "异常心理学 "课程的能力主义背景,并提供了一种替代方案:建立以残疾研究为基础的反能力主义课程。我们以残疾的社会模式和残疾身份为指导原则,以探究式学习为教学驱动力。我们回顾了六项实用策略,其中包括引入社会模式、重新命名课堂、从积极的残疾身份认同入手、将连续性与分类二分法复杂化、以残疾代表为中心、强调消费者权利和方向。通过倚重残疾研究和 "疯狂荣耀","异常心理学 "可以解构其残障主义的根源,并为一种去污名化的、积极的心理障碍研究方法奠定基础。我们提出了未来的发展方向,包括持续评估反残疾主义努力的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Normalizing Abnormal Psychology: An Anti-Ableist Approach Picture This: Studying the Effectiveness of Illustrated Instructions Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: An Artificial Intelligence Contribution Statement for Research Methods Writing Assignments Getting Students Interested in Psychological Measurement by Experiencing the Barnum Effect 2023 Society for Teaching of Psychology Awards and Recognition Recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1