Effect of Electrode Material and Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization on Die Corner Accuracy during Wire Electrical Discharge Machining on Inconel (625): A Comparative Study

IF 2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s11665-024-09649-3
Anshuman Kumar, Chandramani Upadhyay, Vivekananda Kukkala, Ch Sateesh Kumar
{"title":"Effect of Electrode Material and Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization on Die Corner Accuracy during Wire Electrical Discharge Machining on Inconel (625): A Comparative Study","authors":"Anshuman Kumar,&nbsp;Chandramani Upadhyay,&nbsp;Vivekananda Kukkala,&nbsp;Ch Sateesh Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s11665-024-09649-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) has the potential to machine intricate shapes of electrically conductive materials with different hardness. The machining task becomes complicated if a V-shaped profile has to be machined. This corner-cutting process outcome offers a die corner error (CE). It may affect the die and punch alignment. The benefits of zinc-coated copper wire “(BroncoCut-X)” (Wire1) and uncoated brass wire (Wire2) for machining Inconel(625) using WEDM have been reported in this study. The experiments have been conducted at different levels of pulse-on time (<i>S</i><sub>on</sub>), wire tension (WT), flushing pressure (FP), and discharge current (<i>I</i><sub>d</sub>). The machining outcomes of CE, surface roughness (RA), and material removal rate (MRR) with the variation of said wires have been collected and analyzed using main effect plots, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis. The comparison result revealed that Wire1 improves from its counterpart by 29.6, 8.4, and 46.5% of CE, RA and MRR, respectively. Moreover, a hybrid parametric optimization is selected with the combination of \"Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA)” with \"Fuzzy-Interference System (FIS)” and JAYA algorithm (JA). The MOORA and FIS are used to convert machining responses into a single objective (terms as MOORA-fuzzy reasoning grade (MFRG)). The optimal performance is calculated using JA, and the MFRG model is considered for the fitness function. The result was compared with the teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) to check the efficacy of the approach. The confirmatory tests recorded 8.37 and 5.50% overall machining improvements for Wire1 and Wire2, respectively, with the proposed hybrid optimization technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","volume":"34 8","pages":"6780 - 6795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11665-024-09649-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) has the potential to machine intricate shapes of electrically conductive materials with different hardness. The machining task becomes complicated if a V-shaped profile has to be machined. This corner-cutting process outcome offers a die corner error (CE). It may affect the die and punch alignment. The benefits of zinc-coated copper wire “(BroncoCut-X)” (Wire1) and uncoated brass wire (Wire2) for machining Inconel(625) using WEDM have been reported in this study. The experiments have been conducted at different levels of pulse-on time (Son), wire tension (WT), flushing pressure (FP), and discharge current (Id). The machining outcomes of CE, surface roughness (RA), and material removal rate (MRR) with the variation of said wires have been collected and analyzed using main effect plots, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis. The comparison result revealed that Wire1 improves from its counterpart by 29.6, 8.4, and 46.5% of CE, RA and MRR, respectively. Moreover, a hybrid parametric optimization is selected with the combination of "Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA)” with "Fuzzy-Interference System (FIS)” and JAYA algorithm (JA). The MOORA and FIS are used to convert machining responses into a single objective (terms as MOORA-fuzzy reasoning grade (MFRG)). The optimal performance is calculated using JA, and the MFRG model is considered for the fitness function. The result was compared with the teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) to check the efficacy of the approach. The confirmatory tests recorded 8.37 and 5.50% overall machining improvements for Wire1 and Wire2, respectively, with the proposed hybrid optimization technique.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电极材料和混合元理论优化对铬镍铁合金 (625) 线材放电加工过程中模角精度的影响:比较研究
电火花线切割加工(WEDM)具有加工不同硬度、形状复杂的导电材料的潜力。如果要加工v形轮廓,则加工任务变得复杂。这种切角过程的结果提供了一个模具角误差(CE)。这可能会影响模具和冲床的对准。本研究报道了镀锌铜线(BroncoCut-X) (Wire1)和未镀锌铜线(Wire2)在电火花线切割加工铬镍铁合金(625)中的优势。实验在不同的脉冲接通时间(Son)、导线张力(WT)、冲洗压力(FP)和放电电流(Id)水平下进行。利用主效应图、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和方差分析(ANOVA)对CE、表面粗糙度(RA)和材料去除率(MRR)随线材变化的加工结果进行了收集和分析。对比结果显示,Wire1在CE、RA和MRR方面分别比同类产品提高29.6%、8.4和46.5%。选择了“基于比率分析的多目标优化(MOORA)”与“模糊干涉系统(FIS)”和JAYA算法相结合的混合参数优化方法。使用MOORA和FIS将加工响应转换为单个目标(称为MOORA模糊推理等级(MFRG))。采用JA计算最优性能,适应度函数采用MFRG模型。将结果与基于教学的优化(TLBO)方法进行比较,以检验该方法的有效性。验证性测试记录了采用所提出的混合优化技术对Wire1和Wire2的总体加工改进分别为8.37%和5.50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1120
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: ASM International''s Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance focuses on solving day-to-day engineering challenges, particularly those involving components for larger systems. The journal presents a clear understanding of relationships between materials selection, processing, applications and performance. The Journal of Materials Engineering covers all aspects of materials selection, design, processing, characterization and evaluation, including how to improve materials properties through processes and process control of casting, forming, heat treating, surface modification and coating, and fabrication. Testing and characterization (including mechanical and physical tests, NDE, metallography, failure analysis, corrosion resistance, chemical analysis, surface characterization, and microanalysis of surfaces, features and fractures), and industrial performance measurement are also covered
期刊最新文献
Special Issue on Advances in Dissimilar Welding: Integrating Computational Techniques for Enhanced Joint Performance The Influence of the Application of Electromagnetic Fields of Low Intensity during Gas Metal Arc Welding of AL6XN-Inconel 600 Dissimilar Welds Effect of Process Parameters on Force, Torque, Surface Morphology, and Hardness of Friction Stir-Welded AA2024 Alloy Plates Coprecipitation and Properties of Conversion Nano-layers Formed on Steel Plates during Iron Phosphating with Molybdate and Magnesium Nitrate Additives Influence of Low-SiC Content on the Tribological and Electrical Properties of Cu Composites Produced by Spark Plasma Sintering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1