The origins of ‘civil rights and religious liberties’ in the Belfast-Good Friday Agreement

Christopher McCrudden
{"title":"The origins of ‘civil rights and religious liberties’ in the Belfast-Good Friday Agreement","authors":"Christopher McCrudden","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v75iad1.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the origins of the declaration of rights in the human rights and equality section of the 1998 Belfast-Good Friday Agreement, which secured a fragile peace in Northern Ireland. It sets out in detail for the first time the drafting history of the declaration, set against the complex negotiating history of the Agreement as a whole, describing the multiple actors involved in the evolution of the declaration and their motivations, including republican and loyalist paramilitary groups, feminists and civil rights organisations, Irish and British civil servants and political advisors, as well as the political parties. It thus provides a detailed account of the evolution of human rights thinking at a critical stage of the Northern Ireland peace process. The article argues that it is now more important than ever to understand this history. Although originally conceived as merely declaratory, this declaration has, since the European Union–United Kingdom (EU–UK) Withdrawal Agreement following Brexit, taken on a new lease of life due to the Ireland–Northern Ireland Protocol to the EU–UK Withdrawal Agreement, which accorded the declaration of rights a legal status in domestic and international law that it did not have previously. The article concludes with a reflection on the implications of the history recounted in this article for the future interpretation and application of the Protocol (now, the Windsor Framework), and for the study of the historiography of human rights more broadly, emphasising in particular the extent to which the declaration exemplifies a syncretic rather than an eclectic human rights instrument.","PeriodicalId":509896,"journal":{"name":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","volume":"117 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v75iad1.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article traces the origins of the declaration of rights in the human rights and equality section of the 1998 Belfast-Good Friday Agreement, which secured a fragile peace in Northern Ireland. It sets out in detail for the first time the drafting history of the declaration, set against the complex negotiating history of the Agreement as a whole, describing the multiple actors involved in the evolution of the declaration and their motivations, including republican and loyalist paramilitary groups, feminists and civil rights organisations, Irish and British civil servants and political advisors, as well as the political parties. It thus provides a detailed account of the evolution of human rights thinking at a critical stage of the Northern Ireland peace process. The article argues that it is now more important than ever to understand this history. Although originally conceived as merely declaratory, this declaration has, since the European Union–United Kingdom (EU–UK) Withdrawal Agreement following Brexit, taken on a new lease of life due to the Ireland–Northern Ireland Protocol to the EU–UK Withdrawal Agreement, which accorded the declaration of rights a legal status in domestic and international law that it did not have previously. The article concludes with a reflection on the implications of the history recounted in this article for the future interpretation and application of the Protocol (now, the Windsor Framework), and for the study of the historiography of human rights more broadly, emphasising in particular the extent to which the declaration exemplifies a syncretic rather than an eclectic human rights instrument.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝尔法斯特--耶稣受难日协议》中 "公民权利和宗教自由 "的起源
本文追溯了 1998 年《贝尔法斯特--耶稣受难日协议》人权与平等部分中权利宣言的起源,该协议确保了北爱尔兰脆弱的和平。文章首次详细介绍了该宣言的起草历史,并将其与整个协议的复杂谈判历史相结合,描述了参与宣言演变的多方参与者及其动机,包括共和党和效忠派准军事团体、女权主义者和民权组织、爱尔兰和英国公务员和政治顾问以及各政党。因此,文章详细介绍了北爱尔兰和平进程关键阶段人权思想的演变。文章认为,现在比以往任何时候都更有必要了解这段历史。尽管最初的设想仅仅是宣言性的,但自英国脱欧后达成《欧盟-英国撤出协议》以来,这一宣言因《欧盟-英国撤出协议的爱尔兰-北爱尔兰议定书》而获得了新的生命力,该议定书赋予了权利宣言在国内法和国际法中前所未有的法律地位。文章最后反思了本文所叙述的历史对《议定书》(现为《温莎框架》)未来的解释和应用以及对更广泛的人权史学研究的影响,特别强调了该宣言在多大程度上体现了人权文书的融合性而非折衷性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Northern Ireland Executive: politics, law and a rethink of judicial intervention Fettering scrutiny on executive discretionary powers? Developments in the judicial reviewability of ministerial non-statutory guidance Inheriting the royals: royal chartered bodies in Ireland after 1922 The Union in court, Part 3: In Re Allister and Peeples’ Applications for Judicial Review [2023] UKSC 5 A continuing nuisance: Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Ltd [2023] UKSC 16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1