A critical assessment of the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of naturally occurring and synthetic cannabinoids

D. J. Heal, J. Gosden, Sharon L. Smith
{"title":"A critical assessment of the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of naturally occurring and synthetic cannabinoids","authors":"D. J. Heal, J. Gosden, Sharon L. Smith","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1322434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various countries and US States have legalized cannabis, and the use of the psychoactive1 and non-psychoactive cannabinoids is steadily increasing. In this review, we have collated evidence from published non-clinical and clinical sources to evaluate the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of the individual cannabinoids present in cannabis. As context, we also evaluated various synthetic cannabinoids. The evidence shows that delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and other psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis have moderate reinforcing effects. Although they rapidly induce pharmacological tolerance, the withdrawal syndrome produced by the psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis is of moderate severity and lasts from 2 to 6 days. The evidence overwhelmingly shows that non-psychoactive cannabinoids do not produce intoxicating, cognitive or rewarding properties in humans. There has been much speculation whether cannabidiol (CBD) influences the psychoactive and potentially harmful effects of Δ9-THC. Although most non-clinical and clinical investigations have shown that CBD does not attenuate the CNS effects of Δ9-THC or synthetic psychoactive cannabinoids, there is sufficient uncertainty to warrant further research. Based on the analysis, our assessment is cannabis has moderate levels of abuse and dependence risk. While the risks and harms are substantially lower than those posed by many illegal and legal substances of abuse, including tobacco and alcohol, they are far from negligible. In contrast, potent synthetic cannabinoid (CB1/CB2) receptor agonists are more reinforcing and highly intoxicating and pose a substantial risk for abuse and harm. 1 “Psychoactive” is defined as a substance that when taken or administered affects mental processes, e.g., perception, consciousness, cognition or mood and emotions.","PeriodicalId":506619,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"118 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1322434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various countries and US States have legalized cannabis, and the use of the psychoactive1 and non-psychoactive cannabinoids is steadily increasing. In this review, we have collated evidence from published non-clinical and clinical sources to evaluate the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of the individual cannabinoids present in cannabis. As context, we also evaluated various synthetic cannabinoids. The evidence shows that delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and other psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis have moderate reinforcing effects. Although they rapidly induce pharmacological tolerance, the withdrawal syndrome produced by the psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis is of moderate severity and lasts from 2 to 6 days. The evidence overwhelmingly shows that non-psychoactive cannabinoids do not produce intoxicating, cognitive or rewarding properties in humans. There has been much speculation whether cannabidiol (CBD) influences the psychoactive and potentially harmful effects of Δ9-THC. Although most non-clinical and clinical investigations have shown that CBD does not attenuate the CNS effects of Δ9-THC or synthetic psychoactive cannabinoids, there is sufficient uncertainty to warrant further research. Based on the analysis, our assessment is cannabis has moderate levels of abuse and dependence risk. While the risks and harms are substantially lower than those posed by many illegal and legal substances of abuse, including tobacco and alcohol, they are far from negligible. In contrast, potent synthetic cannabinoid (CB1/CB2) receptor agonists are more reinforcing and highly intoxicating and pose a substantial risk for abuse and harm. 1 “Psychoactive” is defined as a substance that when taken or administered affects mental processes, e.g., perception, consciousness, cognition or mood and emotions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对天然大麻素和合成大麻素的滥用、依赖性和相关安全风险的严格评估
多个国家和美国各州已将大麻合法化,精神活性1 和非精神活性大麻素的使用正稳步增加。在这篇综述中,我们整理了已发表的非临床和临床资料来源的证据,以评估大麻中各种大麻素的滥用、依赖性和相关安全风险。作为背景,我们还评估了各种合成大麻素。证据显示,大麻中的δ-9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)和其他具有精神活性的大麻素具有适度的强化作用。虽然它们会迅速诱发药理耐受性,但大麻中的精神活性大麻素产生的戒断综合征严重程度适中,持续时间为 2 至 6 天。大量证据表明,非精神活性大麻素不会对人体产生麻醉、认知或奖励作用。人们一直在猜测大麻二酚(CBD)是否会影响Δ9-四氢大麻酚的精神活性和潜在有害作用。虽然大多数非临床和临床研究都表明,大麻二酚不会减弱Δ9-THC 或合成精神活性大麻素对中枢神经系统的影响,但仍有足够的不确定性需要进一步研究。根据分析,我们的评估是大麻具有中等程度的滥用和依赖风险。虽然其风险和危害大大低于许多非法和合法滥用物质(包括烟草和酒精),但也远非可以忽略不计。相比之下,强效合成大麻素(CB1/CB2)受体激动剂具有更强的强化作用和更高的致醉性,会带来巨大的滥用和伤害风险。1 "精神活性 "是指服用或施用后会影响精神过程(如感知、意识、认知或情绪和情感)的物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and narrow-band auditory stimulation on the intraoperative electroencephalogram: an exploratoratory feasibility study Post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among high school students who experienced war in Woldia town Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder Impact of psychosocial stress on facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia and controls: an experimental study in a forensic sample Serotoninergic antidepressants combination in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1