Comparison of Tegoprazan- and Lansoprazole-Based Fourteen-Day Triple Therapies as First-Line Treatments for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Seok-Mo Kang, Nam-Hoon Kim, Seokhyeon Jeong, Jong Wook Kim, Jung Rock Moon, Yoon Suk Lee, Jun Hyuk Son
{"title":"Comparison of Tegoprazan- and Lansoprazole-Based Fourteen-Day Triple Therapies as First-Line Treatments for Helicobacter pylori Eradication","authors":"Seok-Mo Kang, Nam-Hoon Kim, Seokhyeon Jeong, Jong Wook Kim, Jung Rock Moon, Yoon Suk Lee, Jun Hyuk Son","doi":"10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker with rapid and effective antisecretory activity, was approved for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections in Korea in March 2020. However, real-world data regarding tegoprazan-based therapies are scarce. We compared the efficacies of tegoprazan- and lansoprazole-based triple therapies (TTs).Methods: Between March 2020 and February 2023, this study enrolled patients diagnosed with H. pylori infections who were prescribed either 14-day tegoprazan- or lansoprazole-based TTs as first-line treatments. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to compare H. pylori eradication rates and the rates of patient adherence to the recommended therapy.Results: A total of 670 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infections were prescribed 14-day TT regimens between March 2020 and February 2023 at Ilsan Paik Hospital (Goyang, Korea). Of those enrolled in the study, 64 received tegoprazan-based TT and 295 received lansoprazole-based TT as their first-line treatment. The H. pylori eradication rates for tegoprazan- and lansoprazole-based TTs were 76.6% and 75.6%, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population; the rates were 88.9% and 88.4%, respectively, in the per-protocol population (non-inferiority test, p=0.03 and p=0.01 in the respective populations). No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regards to treatment adherence rates (84.4% vs. 85.1%, p=0.78).Conclusions: As a first-line treatment for H. pylori eradication, 14-day tegoprazan-based TT demonstrated non-inferior efficacy compared with 14-day lansoprazole-based TT.","PeriodicalId":22895,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research","volume":"117 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker with rapid and effective antisecretory activity, was approved for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections in Korea in March 2020. However, real-world data regarding tegoprazan-based therapies are scarce. We compared the efficacies of tegoprazan- and lansoprazole-based triple therapies (TTs).Methods: Between March 2020 and February 2023, this study enrolled patients diagnosed with H. pylori infections who were prescribed either 14-day tegoprazan- or lansoprazole-based TTs as first-line treatments. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to compare H. pylori eradication rates and the rates of patient adherence to the recommended therapy.Results: A total of 670 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infections were prescribed 14-day TT regimens between March 2020 and February 2023 at Ilsan Paik Hospital (Goyang, Korea). Of those enrolled in the study, 64 received tegoprazan-based TT and 295 received lansoprazole-based TT as their first-line treatment. The H. pylori eradication rates for tegoprazan- and lansoprazole-based TTs were 76.6% and 75.6%, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population; the rates were 88.9% and 88.4%, respectively, in the per-protocol population (non-inferiority test, p=0.03 and p=0.01 in the respective populations). No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regards to treatment adherence rates (84.4% vs. 85.1%, p=0.78).Conclusions: As a first-line treatment for H. pylori eradication, 14-day tegoprazan-based TT demonstrated non-inferior efficacy compared with 14-day lansoprazole-based TT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于替戈普拉赞和兰索拉唑的十四天三联疗法作为根除幽门螺旋杆菌一线疗法的比较
目的:特戈普拉赞是一种新型钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,具有快速有效的抗分泌活性,2020 年 3 月在韩国获准用于治疗幽门螺旋杆菌感染。然而,有关替戈普拉赞疗法的真实世界数据却很少。我们比较了替戈拉赞和兰索拉唑三联疗法(TTs)的疗效:方法:2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月期间,本研究招募了被诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的患者,这些患者接受了为期 14 天的替戈拉赞或兰索拉唑三联疗法作为一线治疗。我们对这些患者的病历进行了回顾性审查,以比较幽门螺杆菌根除率和患者对推荐疗法的依从率:2020年3月至2023年2月期间,一山百医院(韩国高阳市)共为670名确诊为幽门螺杆菌感染的患者开出了14天TT治疗处方。在参与研究的患者中,64 人接受了以替戈拉赞为基础的 TT,295 人接受了以兰索拉唑为基础的 TT 作为一线治疗。在意向治疗人群中,替戈普拉赞和兰索拉唑TT的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为76.6%和75.6%;在按协议治疗人群中,这两种药物的根除率分别为88.9%和88.4%(非劣效性检验,在各自人群中的P=0.03和P=0.01)。两组患者的治疗依从率无明显差异(84.4% vs. 85.1%,p=0.78):作为根除幽门螺杆菌的一线治疗方法,与基于兰索拉唑的14天TT疗法相比,基于替戈普拉赞的14天TT疗法的疗效并不逊色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Arising on Duodenal Brunner’s Gland Hyperplasia Successfully Treated Via Endoscopic Resection Parasitic Diseases of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Fungal Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Viral Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Comparison of Tegoprazan- and Lansoprazole-Based Fourteen-Day Triple Therapies as First-Line Treatments for Helicobacter pylori Eradication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1