Correlated high throughput nanoindentation mapping and microstructural characterization of wire and arc additively manufactured 2205 duplex stainless steel

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q2 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Welding in the World Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s40194-024-01795-5
Antoine Queguineur, Rahul Cherukuri, Aloshious Lambai, Manasi Sameer Dalal, Pasi Peura, Gaurav Mohanty, Jean-Yves Hascoët, Iñigo Flores Ituarte
{"title":"Correlated high throughput nanoindentation mapping and microstructural characterization of wire and arc additively manufactured 2205 duplex stainless steel","authors":"Antoine Queguineur,&nbsp;Rahul Cherukuri,&nbsp;Aloshious Lambai,&nbsp;Manasi Sameer Dalal,&nbsp;Pasi Peura,&nbsp;Gaurav Mohanty,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Hascoët,&nbsp;Iñigo Flores Ituarte","doi":"10.1007/s40194-024-01795-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Duplex stainless steels (DSS) in wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) have attracted significant research attention due to their mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. This study uses conventional and nanomechanical testing methods to compare the mechanical and microstructural behaviors at macroscopic and microscopic length scales. Macro hardness (HV10) testing yielded 259 and 249 in low and high heat input (HI) samples, respectively, while ferrite content averaged 52.7 and 48.5%. However, these results fail to provide conclusive insight into the potential influence of microstructural variations at the macroscopic level, likely due to the composite response of the material. To overcome this limitation, the mechanical response of the DSS samples is assessed at the grain level via high throughput nanoindentation mapping with image processing to track the location of each indent. This approach enabled differentiating the indents landing on ferrite and austenite phases as well as those landing on the interfaces. The results showed that the austenite phase had higher hardness (4.30 and 4.35 GPa) than the ferrite phase (3.89 GPa and 4.03 GPa) for high and low HI samples, respectively. The observed differences in hardness between the phases can be attributed to higher nitrogen content in the austenitic phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":809,"journal":{"name":"Welding in the World","volume":"68 9","pages":"2247 - 2257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-024-01795-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding in the World","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-024-01795-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duplex stainless steels (DSS) in wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) have attracted significant research attention due to their mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. This study uses conventional and nanomechanical testing methods to compare the mechanical and microstructural behaviors at macroscopic and microscopic length scales. Macro hardness (HV10) testing yielded 259 and 249 in low and high heat input (HI) samples, respectively, while ferrite content averaged 52.7 and 48.5%. However, these results fail to provide conclusive insight into the potential influence of microstructural variations at the macroscopic level, likely due to the composite response of the material. To overcome this limitation, the mechanical response of the DSS samples is assessed at the grain level via high throughput nanoindentation mapping with image processing to track the location of each indent. This approach enabled differentiating the indents landing on ferrite and austenite phases as well as those landing on the interfaces. The results showed that the austenite phase had higher hardness (4.30 and 4.35 GPa) than the ferrite phase (3.89 GPa and 4.03 GPa) for high and low HI samples, respectively. The observed differences in hardness between the phases can be attributed to higher nitrogen content in the austenitic phase.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
线材和电弧快速成型 2205 双相不锈钢的相关高通量纳米压痕绘图和微结构表征
线弧快速成型制造(WAAM)中的双相不锈钢(DSS)因其机械性能和耐腐蚀性能而备受研究关注。本研究采用传统和纳米力学测试方法,比较宏观和微观长度尺度上的力学和微观结构行为。宏观硬度(HV10)测试结果显示,低热输入(HI)和高热输入(HI)样品的硬度分别为 259 和 249,铁素体含量平均为 52.7% 和 48.5%。然而,由于材料的复合反应,这些结果无法为微观结构变化在宏观层面的潜在影响提供结论性见解。为了克服这一局限性,我们通过高通量纳米压痕绘图和图像处理来跟踪每个压痕的位置,从而在晶粒水平上评估 DSS 样品的机械响应。这种方法能够区分铁素体和奥氏体相上的压痕以及界面上的压痕。结果显示,在高 HI 和低 HI 样品中,奥氏体相的硬度(4.30 和 4.35 GPa)分别高于铁素体相(3.89 GPa 和 4.03 GPa)。观察到的相间硬度差异可归因于奥氏体相中较高的氮含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Welding in the World
Welding in the World METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Welding in the World publishes authoritative papers on every aspect of materials joining, including welding, brazing, soldering, cutting, thermal spraying and allied joining and fabrication techniques.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility study on machine learning methods for prediction of process-related parameters during WAAM process using SS-316L filler material Publisher Correction: Novel approach for in-line process monitoring during ultrasonic metal welding of dissimilar wire/terminal joints based on the thermoelectric effect Life cycle assessment in additive manufacturing of copper alloys—comparison between laser and electron beam Effect of Cr addition on microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of weld metal in weathering steel of high-speed train bogie Influence of travel speed on porosity and liquation cracking in cold wire pulsed gas metal arc welding of aa7075-t651 aluminum alloy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1