Dumping in the Global Dixie: Circle of Poison and the Contamination of the Global South

Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.3828/whpge.63837646622491
Amy M. Hay
{"title":"Dumping in the Global Dixie: Circle of Poison and the Contamination of the Global South","authors":"Amy M. Hay","doi":"10.3828/whpge.63837646622491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The 1981 publication of David Weir and Mark Shapiro’s exposé\n Circle of Poison\n almost ten years after the banning of DDT represented how the landscape of understandings about hazardous chemicals and their regulation had changed. The book exposed two things. One was the ways power had reconfigured itself, which in turn highlighted the ways the story\n Silent Spring\n told, which effectively moved hearts and minds to make change happen. One thing that remained hidden, however, to both Rachel Carson and Weir and Shapiro, was the degree to which the chemical industry traded at the local and regional level, conducting international trade, emulating the poor and often bad faith practices of the transnational corporations. The failure of\n Circle\n ’s narrative, coupled with an overlooked and extensive network of mom-and-pop chemical companies, failed to build on\n Silent Spring\n ’s legacy.\n \n \n This article was published open access under a CC BY licence:\n https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0\n .\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63837646622491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 1981 publication of David Weir and Mark Shapiro’s exposé Circle of Poison almost ten years after the banning of DDT represented how the landscape of understandings about hazardous chemicals and their regulation had changed. The book exposed two things. One was the ways power had reconfigured itself, which in turn highlighted the ways the story Silent Spring told, which effectively moved hearts and minds to make change happen. One thing that remained hidden, however, to both Rachel Carson and Weir and Shapiro, was the degree to which the chemical industry traded at the local and regional level, conducting international trade, emulating the poor and often bad faith practices of the transnational corporations. The failure of Circle ’s narrative, coupled with an overlooked and extensive network of mom-and-pop chemical companies, failed to build on Silent Spring ’s legacy. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在全球迪克西倾倒垃圾:毒圈与全球南部的污染
1981 年,戴维-威尔和马克-夏皮罗的揭露性著作《毒圈》在滴滴涕被禁用近十年后出版,这表明人们对危险化学品及其监管的认识发生了变化。这本书揭露了两件事。一是权力重组的方式,这反过来又凸显了《寂静的春天》所讲述的故事,它有效地打动了人心,使变革得以实现。然而,对于蕾切尔-卡森、韦尔和夏皮罗来说,有一件事仍被掩盖,那就是化学工业在地方和区域层面进行国际贸易的程度,以及仿效跨国公司的拙劣且往往是恶意的做法。圆环》叙述的失败,再加上被忽视的、广泛的母婴化工企业网络,使得《寂静的春天》未能发扬光大。 本文以 CC BY 许可方式公开发表:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1