MONITORING OF CONTRAST AGENT-INDUCED TOXICITY IN A TERTIARY HEALTH-CARE CENTER

Mantasha Rehmani, IRFAN AHMAD KHAN
{"title":"MONITORING OF CONTRAST AGENT-INDUCED TOXICITY IN A TERTIARY HEALTH-CARE CENTER","authors":"Mantasha Rehmani, IRFAN AHMAD KHAN","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the study is to monitor radiological contrast agent-induced toxicity in patients and compare the toxicity and safety profiles of different radiological contrast agents.\nMethods: This is an open-label, prospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in April 2021 and September 2021. The study assessed the incidence of contrast-induced adverse events in different radiological procedures, i.e., contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded using the standard central drug standard control organization ADR reporting form. Causality assessment of the ADRs was done using Naranjo’s scale while severity assessment was measured using the Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale.\nResults: The baseline characteristics of patients were almost similar in both groups. The mean age and gender distribution of the patients were not significantly different among both groups. For the adverse reaction in CECT, the male-to-female ratio was 1.88, and for CEMRI, it was 1.61. The ADRs due to CEMRI and CECT were mild in severity. The results showed that ADRs between contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT were not significantly different.\nConclusion: Based on the results obtained, we concluded that the contrast agents used in the radio-diagnostic procedures are safe, and further research in this field is of fundamental importance.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study is to monitor radiological contrast agent-induced toxicity in patients and compare the toxicity and safety profiles of different radiological contrast agents. Methods: This is an open-label, prospective, observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital in April 2021 and September 2021. The study assessed the incidence of contrast-induced adverse events in different radiological procedures, i.e., contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) scans and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded using the standard central drug standard control organization ADR reporting form. Causality assessment of the ADRs was done using Naranjo’s scale while severity assessment was measured using the Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale. Results: The baseline characteristics of patients were almost similar in both groups. The mean age and gender distribution of the patients were not significantly different among both groups. For the adverse reaction in CECT, the male-to-female ratio was 1.88, and for CEMRI, it was 1.61. The ADRs due to CEMRI and CECT were mild in severity. The results showed that ADRs between contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT were not significantly different. Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, we concluded that the contrast agents used in the radio-diagnostic procedures are safe, and further research in this field is of fundamental importance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一家三级医疗保健中心监测造影剂引起的毒性
研究目的本研究旨在监测放射造影剂引起的患者毒性,并比较不同放射造影剂的毒性和安全性:这是一项开放标签、前瞻性、观察性研究,于 2021 年 4 月和 2021 年 9 月在一家三级医院进行。该研究评估了不同放射手术(即造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)和造影剂增强磁共振成像(CEMRI))中造影剂诱发不良事件的发生率。药物不良反应(ADR)使用中央药物标准控制组织的标准 ADR 报告表进行记录。ADR 的因果关系评估采用纳兰霍量表,严重程度评估采用改良哈特维格和西格尔量表:两组患者的基线特征几乎相似。两组患者的平均年龄和性别分布无明显差异。CECT 的不良反应男女比例为 1.88,CEMRI 的不良反应男女比例为 1.61。CEMRI 和 CECT 引起的不良反应严重程度较轻。结果显示,对比增强 MRI 和对比增强 CT 的 ADR 无明显差异:根据所获得的结果,我们得出结论,放射诊断程序中使用的造影剂是安全的,在这一领域开展进一步研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVERSE-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF SUGAMMADEX IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES OF COVID POSITIVE PREGNANT WOMEN IN PHASE I ANDII INFECTION – A COMPARATIVE STUDY EFFECTIVENESS OF WRIST BLOCK FOR SURGERY OF FRACTURE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT: A CASE REPORT COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN BUNDELKHAND REGION POST-OPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN HERNIA SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE, COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY BETWEEN ROPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.75% AND BUPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.5%
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1