Bidirectional causal relational between frailty and mental illness: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Letian Ma, Zuying Liu, Lijun Fu, Jiaming Fan, Cunlong Kong, Tao Wang, Huilian Bu, Qingying Liu, Jingjing Yuan, Xiaochong Fan
{"title":"Bidirectional causal relational between frailty and mental illness: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Letian Ma, Zuying Liu, Lijun Fu, Jiaming Fan, Cunlong Kong, Tao Wang, Huilian Bu, Qingying Liu, Jingjing Yuan, Xiaochong Fan","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1397813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frailty has been associated with mental illness (MI) observational studies, but the causal relationship between these factors remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the bidirectional causality between frailty and MI by two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.To investigate the causal relationship among them, summary statistics of frailty index (FI) and six types of MI: anxiety, depression, affective disorder, mania, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were included in this MR study. This MR analysis was performed using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and weighted median. The stability of the results was evaluated using Cochran’s Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, Funnel Plots, and leave-one-out analysis.Genetic predisposition to FI was significantly associated with increased anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.33, P = 8.18E-03), depression (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.71, P = 8.21E-04), affective disorder (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.28-2.27, P = 2.57E-04). However, our study findings do not demonstrate a causal relationship between FI and mania (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.06, P = 2.20E-01), schizophrenia (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.07-0.86, P = 9.28E-01). In particular, although the IVW results suggest a potential causal relationship between FI and OCD (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.07-0.86, P = 2.85E-02), the directions obtained from the three methods we employed ultimately show inconsistency. Therefore, the result must be interpreted with caution. The results of the reverse MR analysis indicated a statistically significant and causal relationship between anxiety (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 2.00E-02), depression (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, P = 7.99E-03), affective disorder (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.21, P = 3.39E-07), and schizophrenia (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 1.70E-03) with FI. However, our findings do not provide support for a link between mania (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.79-2.72, P = 2.27E-01), OCD (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 2.11E-01) and an increased risk of FI.The MR results suggest a potential bidirectional causal relationship between FI and anxiety, depression, and affective disorder. Schizophrenia was found to be associated with a higher risk of FI. The evidence was insufficient to support a causal relationship between Fl and other Ml. These findings offer new insights into the development of effective management strategies for frailty and MI.","PeriodicalId":506619,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1397813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frailty has been associated with mental illness (MI) observational studies, but the causal relationship between these factors remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the bidirectional causality between frailty and MI by two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.To investigate the causal relationship among them, summary statistics of frailty index (FI) and six types of MI: anxiety, depression, affective disorder, mania, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were included in this MR study. This MR analysis was performed using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and weighted median. The stability of the results was evaluated using Cochran’s Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, Funnel Plots, and leave-one-out analysis.Genetic predisposition to FI was significantly associated with increased anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-2.33, P = 8.18E-03), depression (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.71, P = 8.21E-04), affective disorder (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.28-2.27, P = 2.57E-04). However, our study findings do not demonstrate a causal relationship between FI and mania (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.06, P = 2.20E-01), schizophrenia (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.07-0.86, P = 9.28E-01). In particular, although the IVW results suggest a potential causal relationship between FI and OCD (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.07-0.86, P = 2.85E-02), the directions obtained from the three methods we employed ultimately show inconsistency. Therefore, the result must be interpreted with caution. The results of the reverse MR analysis indicated a statistically significant and causal relationship between anxiety (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 2.00E-02), depression (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, P = 7.99E-03), affective disorder (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.21, P = 3.39E-07), and schizophrenia (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 1.70E-03) with FI. However, our findings do not provide support for a link between mania (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.79-2.72, P = 2.27E-01), OCD (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 2.11E-01) and an increased risk of FI.The MR results suggest a potential bidirectional causal relationship between FI and anxiety, depression, and affective disorder. Schizophrenia was found to be associated with a higher risk of FI. The evidence was insufficient to support a causal relationship between Fl and other Ml. These findings offer new insights into the development of effective management strategies for frailty and MI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱与精神疾病之间的双向因果关系:双样本孟德尔随机研究
观察研究发现,虚弱与精神疾病(MI)有关,但这些因素之间的因果关系仍不确定。为了研究它们之间的因果关系,本研究将虚弱指数(FI)和六种精神疾病(焦虑症、抑郁症、情感障碍、躁狂症、精神分裂症和强迫症)的汇总统计数据纳入了 MR 研究。本次磁共振分析采用了逆方差加权法(IVW)、磁共振-艾格回归法和加权中位法。结果的稳定性通过 Cochran's Q 检验、MR-Egger 截距检验、漏斗图和leave-one-out 分析进行评估。遗传易感性与焦虑(几率比 [OR] = 1.62,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.13-2.33,P = 8.18E-03)、抑郁(OR = 1.88,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.30-2.71,P = 8.21E-04)和情感障碍(OR = 1.70,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.28-2.27,P = 2.57E-04)的增加明显相关。然而,我们的研究结果并未证明 FI 与躁狂症(OR = 1.02,95% CI 0.99-1.06,P = 2.20E-01)、精神分裂症(OR = 1.02,95% CI 0.07-0.86,P = 9.28E-01)之间存在因果关系。特别是,尽管 IVW 的结果表明 FI 与强迫症之间存在潜在的因果关系(OR = 0.64,95% CI 0.07-0.86,P = 2.85E-02),但我们采用的三种方法最终得到的方向并不一致。因此,必须谨慎解释这一结果。反向 MR 分析结果表明,焦虑(OR = 1.06,95% CI 1.01-1.11,P = 2.00E-02)、抑郁(OR = 1.14,95% CI 1.04-1.26,P = 7.99E-03)、情感障碍(OR = 1.15,95% CI 1.09-1.21,P = 3.39E-07)和精神分裂症(OR = 1.02,95% CI 1.01-1.04,P = 1.70E-03)与 FI 之间存在明显的因果关系。然而,我们的研究结果并不支持躁狂症(OR = 1.46,95% CI 0.79-2.72,P = 2.27E-01)、强迫症(OR = 1.01,95% CI 1.00-1.02,P = 2.11E-01)与 FI 风险增加之间的联系。研究发现,精神分裂症与较高的 FI 风险有关。证据不足以支持Fl与其他Ml之间的因果关系。这些发现为制定针对虚弱和心肌缺血的有效管理策略提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation and narrow-band auditory stimulation on the intraoperative electroencephalogram: an exploratoratory feasibility study Post-traumatic stress disorder and associated factors among high school students who experienced war in Woldia town Applying a clinical staging model in patients affected by schizophrenia spectrum disorder Impact of psychosocial stress on facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia and controls: an experimental study in a forensic sample Serotoninergic antidepressants combination in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1