AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF USAGE OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE PILLS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OF THIRD FIRST MBBS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL

Prachi Mehta, Sneh Dudhia
{"title":"AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF USAGE OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE PILLS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OF THIRD FIRST MBBS IN A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL","authors":"Prachi Mehta, Sneh Dudhia","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Education about contraceptive measures in reproductive health is of utmost importance. Doctors can directly influence the patients, and it is, therefore, necessary to know their attitude toward contraceptives. This study will assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the usage of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) among the students of the IIIrd first MBBS.\nMethods: Among 125 students of the third first MBBS, a questionnaire-based observational knowledge, attitude, perception, and practice study was conducted using Google Forms, at SBKSMI&RC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Sumandeep Vidyapeeth in June 2023.\nResults: In our study, 59.2% of participants were female and 40.8% were male. Students were of the age 20–23 years. 60.8% of students mentioned their source of information as formal education. On being asked about the different uses of OCPs, 69.6% knew about their use as contraception and 52.8% knew their use in menstrual irregularities. In case of a dose being missed, 18.4% did not know what to do whereas 28% would consult a gynecologist and 53.6% knew what to do. 41.6% of students believed that OCPs carry significant side effects. 42.4% preferred getting OCP from medical stores. For usage or prescription in the future, 52.8% preferred barrier methods whereas 24.8% chose intrauterine devices and only 19.2% opted for OCP. When inquired on reasons for not using OCPs, 31.2% opted for fear of side effects.\nConclusion: The majority of the students had good knowledge, fair attitude, and fair practice toward the use of OCPs.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024.v17i6.50770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Education about contraceptive measures in reproductive health is of utmost importance. Doctors can directly influence the patients, and it is, therefore, necessary to know their attitude toward contraceptives. This study will assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the usage of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) among the students of the IIIrd first MBBS. Methods: Among 125 students of the third first MBBS, a questionnaire-based observational knowledge, attitude, perception, and practice study was conducted using Google Forms, at SBKSMI&RC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Sumandeep Vidyapeeth in June 2023. Results: In our study, 59.2% of participants were female and 40.8% were male. Students were of the age 20–23 years. 60.8% of students mentioned their source of information as formal education. On being asked about the different uses of OCPs, 69.6% knew about their use as contraception and 52.8% knew their use in menstrual irregularities. In case of a dose being missed, 18.4% did not know what to do whereas 28% would consult a gynecologist and 53.6% knew what to do. 41.6% of students believed that OCPs carry significant side effects. 42.4% preferred getting OCP from medical stores. For usage or prescription in the future, 52.8% preferred barrier methods whereas 24.8% chose intrauterine devices and only 19.2% opted for OCP. When inquired on reasons for not using OCPs, 31.2% opted for fear of side effects. Conclusion: The majority of the students had good knowledge, fair attitude, and fair practice toward the use of OCPs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一所三级甲等教学医院医学学士学位三年级本科生使用口服避孕药的知识、态度和实践的观察研究
目的有关生殖健康避孕措施的教育至关重要。医生可以直接影响病人,因此有必要了解他们对避孕药具的态度。本研究将对第三届医学学士学位学生使用口服避孕药(OCP)的知识、态度和做法进行评估:方法:2023 年 6 月,在苏曼迪普大学(Sumandeep Vidyapeeth)SBKSMI&RC(Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre)的 125 名第三届医学学士学位学生中,使用谷歌表格进行了一项基于问卷的知识、态度、认知和实践观察研究:在我们的研究中,59.2%的参与者为女性,40.8%为男性。学生年龄在 20-23 岁之间。60.8%的学生提到他们的信息来源是正规教育。在被问及 OCPs 的不同用途时,69.6% 的人知道它们可用于避孕,52.8% 的人知道它们可用于月经不调。如果漏服,18.4%的学生不知道该怎么办,28%的学生会咨询妇科医生,53.6%的学生知道该怎么办。41.6% 的学生认为 OCPs 有很大的副作用。42.4% 的学生倾向于从医药商店购买 OCP。对于今后的使用或处方,52.8%的人选择屏障避孕法,24.8%的人选择宫内避孕器,只有 19.2%的人选择 OCP。当被问及不使用 OCP 的原因时,31.2%的人选择了害怕副作用:结论:大多数学生对使用 OCPs 有良好的认识、持公平的态度和公平的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVERSE-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF SUGAMMADEX IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES OF COVID POSITIVE PREGNANT WOMEN IN PHASE I ANDII INFECTION – A COMPARATIVE STUDY EFFECTIVENESS OF WRIST BLOCK FOR SURGERY OF FRACTURE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT: A CASE REPORT COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN BUNDELKHAND REGION POST-OPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN HERNIA SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE, COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY BETWEEN ROPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.75% AND BUPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.5%
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1