Agricultural Land Pawning as a Social Institution in Wono Agung Village Tulang Bawang District

Raswanto Raswanto, F. Sumarja, Ati Yuniati
{"title":"Agricultural Land Pawning as a Social Institution in Wono Agung Village Tulang Bawang District","authors":"Raswanto Raswanto, F. Sumarja, Ati Yuniati","doi":"10.25041/aelr.v5i1.3437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural land pawning, as outlined in Law No. 56/1960 on the Determination of Agricultural Land Area, is characterized as a collateral transaction where agricultural land is mortgaged or pledged. Social institutions can play a key role in this process, acting as facilitators for loan provisions against land collateral and helping to evaluate and understand the motivations behind agricultural land pawning. This research adopts an empirical normative approach to assess the practice. The findings reveal that agricultural land pawning in Wono Agung Village is conducted in two principal manners: verbally and in writing, aligning with the stipulations of Article 7 of Law Number 5 of 1960. The residents of Wono Agung Village typically engage in pawning their agricultural land for several reasons, including the need for capital, education expenses, expansion of agricultural land, general economic difficulties, and other urgent necessities. Challenges in the implementation of agricultural land pawning arise from issues involving both the pawn recipients and the landowners. Despite these obstacles, agricultural land pawning functions effectively as a social institution, offering a viable solution to the economic struggles faced by the villagers. These social institutions play a pivotal role in enhancing the welfare and economic conditions of the agricultural community in Wono Agung Village.","PeriodicalId":52589,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v5i1.3437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural land pawning, as outlined in Law No. 56/1960 on the Determination of Agricultural Land Area, is characterized as a collateral transaction where agricultural land is mortgaged or pledged. Social institutions can play a key role in this process, acting as facilitators for loan provisions against land collateral and helping to evaluate and understand the motivations behind agricultural land pawning. This research adopts an empirical normative approach to assess the practice. The findings reveal that agricultural land pawning in Wono Agung Village is conducted in two principal manners: verbally and in writing, aligning with the stipulations of Article 7 of Law Number 5 of 1960. The residents of Wono Agung Village typically engage in pawning their agricultural land for several reasons, including the need for capital, education expenses, expansion of agricultural land, general economic difficulties, and other urgent necessities. Challenges in the implementation of agricultural land pawning arise from issues involving both the pawn recipients and the landowners. Despite these obstacles, agricultural land pawning functions effectively as a social institution, offering a viable solution to the economic struggles faced by the villagers. These social institutions play a pivotal role in enhancing the welfare and economic conditions of the agricultural community in Wono Agung Village.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wono Agung 村 Tulang Bawang 区的农田典当社会制度
关于确定农业用地面积的第 56/1960 号法律规定,农业用地典当的特点是农业用地抵押或质押的担保交易。社会机构可在这一过程中发挥关键作用,充当土地抵押贷款的促进者,并帮助评估和了解农地典当背后的动机。本研究采用实证规范方法对这一做法进行评估。研究结果显示,沃诺阿贡村的农地典当主要以两种方式进行:口头和书面,符合 1960 年第 5 号法律第 7 条的规定。Wono Agung 村居民典当农田通常有几个原因,包括资金需求、教育支出、农田扩建、一般经济困难和其他迫切需要。实施农田典当的挑战来自典当对象和土地所有者双方的问题。尽管存在这些障碍,农地典当作为一种社会制度还是有效地发挥了作用,为村民面临的经济困境提供了可行的解决方案。这些社会机构在提高沃诺阿公村农业社区的福利和经济条件方面发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Agricultural Land Pawning as a Social Institution in Wono Agung Village Tulang Bawang District Legal Risks in Future Housing Purchase and Sale Contracts: A Case Research in Vietnam Legal Certainty of the Right to Severance Pay for Workers Who Retire in Companies That Undergo Acquisitions The Authority of Lampung Provincial Government in Managing Fisheries Resources in Era of Regional Autonomy The Role of Environmental Legal Instruments and Government Policies in Realizing Sustainable Development in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1