Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement

Jennifer Schumann, Steve Oswald
{"title":"Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement","authors":"Jennifer Schumann, Steve Oswald","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00094.sch","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The introduction to this special issue provides an overview of the notion of disagreement in relation to\n argumentative practices and presents the rationale for investigating disagreement management in argumentative discourse from a\n pragmatic perspective. It describes how existing accounts of disagreement in argumentation have focused on limited instances of\n the phenomenon, both in terms of its pragmatic embedding (which has predominantly focused on assertive speech acts) and of its\n scope (which usually covers the normative dimension of argumentative quality). The contributions to this special issue are then\n presented and contextualised within this broader topic to expound how each of them addresses key pragmatic aspects of disagreement\n management in argumentative discourse.","PeriodicalId":499828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of language aggression and conflict","volume":" 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of language aggression and conflict","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00094.sch","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction to this special issue provides an overview of the notion of disagreement in relation to argumentative practices and presents the rationale for investigating disagreement management in argumentative discourse from a pragmatic perspective. It describes how existing accounts of disagreement in argumentation have focused on limited instances of the phenomenon, both in terms of its pragmatic embedding (which has predominantly focused on assertive speech acts) and of its scope (which usually covers the normative dimension of argumentative quality). The contributions to this special issue are then presented and contextualised within this broader topic to expound how each of them addresses key pragmatic aspects of disagreement management in argumentative discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从务实角度看分歧
本特刊的导言概述了与论辩实践相关的分歧概念,并提出了从语用学角度研究论辩话语中的分歧管理的理由。它描述了论证中分歧的现有论述是如何在其语用嵌入(主要集中于断言性言语行为)和其范围(通常涵盖论证质量的规范维度)两个方面,将重点放在该现象的有限实例上的。本特刊的文稿将在这一更广泛的主题下进行介绍和背景分析,以阐述每篇文稿是如何解决论辩话语中分歧管理的关键语用问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The evidential dimension of implicitly conveyed disagreement in political debates Aggression and disagreement in public communication Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement “So I know how to do this” Justifying the accusation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1