Comparing the quality of life of patients with epilepsy receiving conventional and newer antiepileptics in a tertiary care hospital, Northern India

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.25259/ijpp_479_2023
Meenu Thomas, D. K. Badyal, J. Pandian
{"title":"Comparing the quality of life of patients with epilepsy receiving conventional and newer antiepileptics in a tertiary care hospital, Northern India","authors":"Meenu Thomas, D. K. Badyal, J. Pandian","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_479_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBoth conventional and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are being used as initial monotherapy in epileptic patients. However, differences in their quality of life (QoL) scores have not been researched considerably. The objective of this study was to determine the overall QoL employing the QoL in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) questionnaire\n\n\n\nThis prospective comparative research was conducted on 126 patients with epilepsy. Two equal groups, A and B, consisting of 63 patients each, were allocated conventional and newer AEDs, respectively. The allotment of the AED was as per the decision of the treating physician based on patient and drug characteristics. QoL was assessed at 0 and 12 weeks using questionnaire QOLIE-31.\n\n\n\nThe QoL showed significant improvement with newer AEDs, while conventional AEDs worsened it. The subscales of QOLIE-31 showing the statistical difference in the mean percentage change were worry related to seizure, energy/fatigue, cognitive function, and medication effects. QoL did show a statistically significant difference in young and more educated patients. The patients who had generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) demonstrated a better QoL than patients with partial seizures, as per the questionnaire.\n\n\n\nThe findings of our study suggest that QoL is better with newer AEDs. There seemed to be no effect of gender, age, or education on QoL; however, subjects with GTCS displayed a better QoL. Therefore, newer AEDs can be helpful in improving QoL in epileptic patients. Newer Antiepileptics as monotherapy may offer a better quality of life to epileptic patients.\n","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_479_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both conventional and newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are being used as initial monotherapy in epileptic patients. However, differences in their quality of life (QoL) scores have not been researched considerably. The objective of this study was to determine the overall QoL employing the QoL in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) questionnaire This prospective comparative research was conducted on 126 patients with epilepsy. Two equal groups, A and B, consisting of 63 patients each, were allocated conventional and newer AEDs, respectively. The allotment of the AED was as per the decision of the treating physician based on patient and drug characteristics. QoL was assessed at 0 and 12 weeks using questionnaire QOLIE-31. The QoL showed significant improvement with newer AEDs, while conventional AEDs worsened it. The subscales of QOLIE-31 showing the statistical difference in the mean percentage change were worry related to seizure, energy/fatigue, cognitive function, and medication effects. QoL did show a statistically significant difference in young and more educated patients. The patients who had generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) demonstrated a better QoL than patients with partial seizures, as per the questionnaire. The findings of our study suggest that QoL is better with newer AEDs. There seemed to be no effect of gender, age, or education on QoL; however, subjects with GTCS displayed a better QoL. Therefore, newer AEDs can be helpful in improving QoL in epileptic patients. Newer Antiepileptics as monotherapy may offer a better quality of life to epileptic patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较印度北部一家三级医院中接受传统和新型抗癫痫药物治疗的癫痫患者的生活质量
传统和新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)都被用作癫痫患者的初始单一疗法。然而,关于他们的生活质量(QoL)评分差异的研究并不多。这项前瞻性比较研究针对 126 名癫痫患者进行。A 组和 B 组各由 63 名患者组成,两组人数相等,分别分配到传统和新型 AEDs。AED的分配由主治医生根据患者和药物特征决定。QoL在0周和12周时使用QOLIE-31问卷进行评估。QOLIE-31的子量表在平均百分比变化上显示出统计学差异的是与癫痫发作有关的担忧、能量/疲劳、认知功能和药物效应。年轻和受教育程度较高的患者在 QoL 方面确实存在显著的统计学差异。根据问卷调查,全身强直-阵挛发作(GTCS)患者的 QoL 优于部分性发作患者。性别、年龄或教育程度似乎对 QoL 没有影响,但 GTCS 患者的 QoL 更好。因此,新型 AEDs 有助于改善癫痫患者的 QoL。新型抗癫痫药物作为单一疗法可提高癫痫患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction programme for substance abuse patients in deaddiction centre Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study Oesophageal pressure topographic metrics in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An Indian perspective Erratum: Breath characteristics in four volitional yoga breathing practices Deep brain stimulation for the heterogeneous pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1