Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.25259/ijpp_537_2023
Neetha Shastry, N. Ullal, A. Thattil, D. S. Maitreyee, Shwetha Ranjeet Bangera, L. Mahmood
{"title":"Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study","authors":"Neetha Shastry, N. Ullal, A. Thattil, D. S. Maitreyee, Shwetha Ranjeet Bangera, L. Mahmood","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_537_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMedical education in India has shifted to a learner-centric approach, with early clinical exposure (ECE) mandated for 1st-year medical students. Implementing ECE in a clinical setting is challenging, leading to the adoption of simulation-based ECE (SB-ECE). However, faculty perceptions of integrating simulation with ECE, especially for 1st-year undergraduates, remain understudied. This study aimed to explore faculty perceptions of the feasibility, advantages and challenges of using simulations in ECE, providing valuable insights for future studies.\n\n\n\nWe conducted a qualitative study with intentional sampling according to predefined criteria. We interviewed 12 faculty members at a medical teaching institution using a topic guide. Thematic analysis was then performed on the data collected from the 12 interviews to identify the key themes and patterns.\n\n\n\nMost of the faculty interviewed considered the use of simulation in ECE as an excellent adjunct to teaching in a clinical setting. However, the faculty also noted a few challenges, such as fidelity, time constraints and the ratio of students to faculty members, in implementing SB-ECE.\n\n\n\nFaculty members recognised the integration of simulation into ECE as a highly effective tool for enhancing the learning of basic sciences and fostering attitudes, ethics and professionalism in medical education, with the main challenge being the logistical demand for implementing simulation-based sessions.\n","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_537_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical education in India has shifted to a learner-centric approach, with early clinical exposure (ECE) mandated for 1st-year medical students. Implementing ECE in a clinical setting is challenging, leading to the adoption of simulation-based ECE (SB-ECE). However, faculty perceptions of integrating simulation with ECE, especially for 1st-year undergraduates, remain understudied. This study aimed to explore faculty perceptions of the feasibility, advantages and challenges of using simulations in ECE, providing valuable insights for future studies. We conducted a qualitative study with intentional sampling according to predefined criteria. We interviewed 12 faculty members at a medical teaching institution using a topic guide. Thematic analysis was then performed on the data collected from the 12 interviews to identify the key themes and patterns. Most of the faculty interviewed considered the use of simulation in ECE as an excellent adjunct to teaching in a clinical setting. However, the faculty also noted a few challenges, such as fidelity, time constraints and the ratio of students to faculty members, in implementing SB-ECE. Faculty members recognised the integration of simulation into ECE as a highly effective tool for enhancing the learning of basic sciences and fostering attitudes, ethics and professionalism in medical education, with the main challenge being the logistical demand for implementing simulation-based sessions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对印度医科学生早期接触模拟临床的效果、益处和挑战的看法:定性研究
印度的医学教育已转向以学习者为中心的方法,规定一年级医学生必须尽早接触临床(ECE)。在临床环境中实施幼教具有挑战性,因此采用了基于模拟的幼教(SB-ECE)。然而,教师对将模拟与幼教相结合的看法,尤其是对一年级本科生的看法,仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨教师对在幼教中使用模拟的可行性、优势和挑战的看法,为今后的研究提供有价值的见解。我们根据预先设定的标准进行了有意取样,并使用主题指南对一家医学教学机构的 12 名教师进行了访谈。大多数受访教师认为,在幼教中使用模拟教学是临床教学的绝佳辅助手段。然而,教员们也指出了在实施 SB-ECE 过程中遇到的一些挑战,如真实性、时间限制和学生与教员的比例。教员们认为,将模拟融入幼教是一种非常有效的工具,可以加强基础科学的学习,培养医学教育中的态度、道德和专业精神,而主要的挑战在于实施模拟课程的后勤需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction programme for substance abuse patients in deaddiction centre Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study Oesophageal pressure topographic metrics in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An Indian perspective Erratum: Breath characteristics in four volitional yoga breathing practices Deep brain stimulation for the heterogeneous pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1