Exceptions to the Ne Bis in Idem Principle in the Context of Articles 54 and 55(1)(b) CISA and Compatibility of Declarations Not to be Bound by that Principle with Articles 50 and 52(1) CFREU

Ger Coffey
{"title":"Exceptions to the Ne Bis in Idem Principle in the Context of Articles 54 and 55(1)(b) CISA and Compatibility of Declarations Not to be Bound by that Principle with Articles 50 and 52(1) CFREU","authors":"Ger Coffey","doi":"10.1177/20322844241250201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment in Criminal proceedings against MR (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bamberg) Case C–365/21 was delivered on 23 March 2023 wherein the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) examined the complex interrelated issues concerning Article 54 CISA interstate application of the ne bis in idem principle (in the context of free movement of persons), Article 55(1)(b) CISA exceptions to the application of that principle, Article 50 CFREU interstate application of the principle (in the context of a fundamental right), and Article 52(1) CFREU limitations to the application of that principle subject to the principle of proportionality. The CJEU examined the compatibility of declarations not to be bound by the application of Article 54 CISA commensurate with Article 55(1)(b) CISA in the context of a criminal organisation and financial crime, offences against national security or other equally essential interests, and the compatibility of such declarations with Article 50 and Article 52(1) CFREU. The CJEU ruled that Article 55(1)(b) CISA exception to the principle was compatible with Article 50 CFREU. This is the first CJEU judgment on exceptions to Article 54 CISA and compatibility of declarations not to be bound by that principle with Article 50 CFREU. This article examines the significance and implications of the judgment within the area of freedom, security and justice.","PeriodicalId":508076,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241250201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The judgment in Criminal proceedings against MR (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bamberg) Case C–365/21 was delivered on 23 March 2023 wherein the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) examined the complex interrelated issues concerning Article 54 CISA interstate application of the ne bis in idem principle (in the context of free movement of persons), Article 55(1)(b) CISA exceptions to the application of that principle, Article 50 CFREU interstate application of the principle (in the context of a fundamental right), and Article 52(1) CFREU limitations to the application of that principle subject to the principle of proportionality. The CJEU examined the compatibility of declarations not to be bound by the application of Article 54 CISA commensurate with Article 55(1)(b) CISA in the context of a criminal organisation and financial crime, offences against national security or other equally essential interests, and the compatibility of such declarations with Article 50 and Article 52(1) CFREU. The CJEU ruled that Article 55(1)(b) CISA exception to the principle was compatible with Article 50 CFREU. This is the first CJEU judgment on exceptions to Article 54 CISA and compatibility of declarations not to be bound by that principle with Article 50 CFREU. This article examines the significance and implications of the judgment within the area of freedom, security and justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CISA 第 54 和 55(1)(b)条背景下 "Ne Bis in Idem "原则的例外情况以及不受该原则约束的声明与 CFREU 第 50 和 52(1)条的兼容性
欧盟法院(CJEU)于 2023 年 3 月 23 日对 MR(班贝格总检察长)刑事诉讼案(C-365/21)做出判决,审查了与一罪不二审原则(在人员自由流动的情况下)的第 54 CISA 条国家间适用相关的复杂问题、CISA 第 55(1)(b)条适用该原则的例外情况、《欧盟基本权利公约》第 50 条国家间适用该原则(在基本权利的背景下)以及《欧盟基本权利公约》第 52(1)条适用该原则的限制(受相称性原则的制约)。欧盟法院审查了在犯罪组织和金融犯罪、危害国家安全罪或其他同样重要的利益的情况下,不受与第 55(1)(b)条相称的第 54 CISA 条适用约束的声明的兼容性,以及此类声明与第 50 条和第 52(1)CFREU条的兼容性。欧盟法院裁定,CISA 第 55(1)(b)条原则的例外情况符合《欧盟运作条约》第 50 条。这是欧盟法院首次就 CISA 第 54 条的例外情况以及不受该原则约束的声明是否符合《欧盟运作条约》第 50 条做出判决。本文探讨了该判决在自由、安全和司法领域的意义和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The non-punishment of human trafficking victims in Europe: A comparative perspective Cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters: The new EU legislation and the consolidation of a paradigm shift in the area of ‘judicial’ cooperation Exceptions to the Ne Bis in Idem Principle in the Context of Articles 54 and 55(1)(b) CISA and Compatibility of Declarations Not to be Bound by that Principle with Articles 50 and 52(1) CFREU Quo vadis Europa—balancing between efficiency and guarantees in criminal proceedings using the example of EU production and preservation orders Double criminality and the European Arrest Warrant: current trends and future developments in light of the KL case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1