Moderating Effect of Intellectual Capital Components on the Relationship between ESG Scores and Firm Financial Performance

Adi Pratama, B. Pratama, Sri Wahyuni, Ira Hapsari
{"title":"Moderating Effect of Intellectual Capital Components on the Relationship between ESG Scores and Firm Financial Performance","authors":"Adi Pratama, B. Pratama, Sri Wahyuni, Ira Hapsari","doi":"10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i61375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aims to determine the relationship between ESG Scores, Human Capital Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as HCE), Structural Capital Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as SCE), and Capital Employed Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as CEE) with Firm Financial Performance (hereinafter referred to as FFP). The role of HCE, SCE, and CEE as moderation between ESG Scores and FFP is also examined. This study uses Firm Size as a control variable. \nStudy Design: Quantitative, Correlation, Panel data regression on time series data. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Sample: With a purposive sampling approach, a total of 122 consisting of 58 companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2020-2023 and have ESG Scores from Morningstar Sustainalytics. \nMethodology: This study utilized the Fixed Effect Regression Model based on the preliminary test results for panel data regression. \nResults: The results of this study indicate that ESG Scores, HCE, and CEE have a positive effect on FFP, SCE doesn’t affect FFP, HCE cannot moderate the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP, SCE weakens the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP, and CEE strengthens the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP. \nConclusion: This research concludes that the company's increasing FFP is influenced by several factors, including ESG Scores and Intellectual Capital (hereinafter referred to as IC) Component. The results of this study can be taken into consideration by companies and external parties such as potential investors and can influence stakeholders’ decision-making regarding the FFP which is influenced by ESG reflected by ESG Scores and knowledge-based corporate resources reflected by the IC Component.","PeriodicalId":505152,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i61375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to determine the relationship between ESG Scores, Human Capital Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as HCE), Structural Capital Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as SCE), and Capital Employed Efficiency (hereinafter referred to as CEE) with Firm Financial Performance (hereinafter referred to as FFP). The role of HCE, SCE, and CEE as moderation between ESG Scores and FFP is also examined. This study uses Firm Size as a control variable. Study Design: Quantitative, Correlation, Panel data regression on time series data. Place and Duration of Study: Sample: With a purposive sampling approach, a total of 122 consisting of 58 companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2020-2023 and have ESG Scores from Morningstar Sustainalytics. Methodology: This study utilized the Fixed Effect Regression Model based on the preliminary test results for panel data regression. Results: The results of this study indicate that ESG Scores, HCE, and CEE have a positive effect on FFP, SCE doesn’t affect FFP, HCE cannot moderate the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP, SCE weakens the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP, and CEE strengthens the relationship between ESG Scores and FFP. Conclusion: This research concludes that the company's increasing FFP is influenced by several factors, including ESG Scores and Intellectual Capital (hereinafter referred to as IC) Component. The results of this study can be taken into consideration by companies and external parties such as potential investors and can influence stakeholders’ decision-making regarding the FFP which is influenced by ESG reflected by ESG Scores and knowledge-based corporate resources reflected by the IC Component.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力资本成分对环境、社会和公司治理得分与公司财务绩效之间关系的调节作用
目的:本研究旨在确定 ESG 分数、人力资本效率(以下简称 HCE)、结构资本效率(以下简称 SCE)和资本使用效率(以下简称 CEE)与公司财务绩效(以下简称 FFP)之间的关系。本研究还考察了 HCE、SCE 和 CEE 在 ESG 分数与 FFP 之间的调节作用。本研究将公司规模作为控制变量。研究设计:定量、相关、时间序列数据的面板数据回归。研究地点和时间:样本:采用目的性抽样方法,从 2020-2023 年在印尼证券交易所上市的 58 家公司中抽取 122 个样本,这些公司的 ESG 分数均来自晨星可持续发展分析公司(Morningstar Sustainalytics)。研究方法:根据面板数据回归的初步测试结果,本研究采用固定效应回归模型。研究结果研究结果表明,ESG 分数、HCE 和 CEE 对 FFP 有积极影响,SCE 不会影响 FFP,HCE 无法调节 ESG 分数和 FFP 之间的关系,SCE 会削弱 ESG 分数和 FFP 之间的关系,而 CEE 会加强 ESG 分数和 FFP 之间的关系。结论本研究得出结论,公司财务自由度的提高受多个因素的影响,其中包括 ESG 分数和智力资本(以下简称 IC)成分。本研究的结果可供公司和外部各方(如潜在投资者)参考,并可影响利益相关者关于 FFP 的决策,而 FFP 受 ESG 分数所反映的 ESG 和 IC 成分所反映的知识型企业资源的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Inclusive Finance Helps Green Industry in Fujian Province Development Signaling Theory in Action: How Dividends Affect Shareholder Investment Decisions in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks Taxpayer Compliance: Can Accountant Commitment, Whistleblowing, and Tax System Modernization Impact? The Effect of Customer Experience on Repurchase Intention Through Customer Satisfaction Virtual Products Game Mobile Legends: Bang Bang in Cimahi City, Indonesia Perceived Experience, Value, and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Satisfaction in Citilink's YIA-PKU Route
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1