Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Yam Ting Ho, J. Saad, Femi E. Ayeni, S. Ranasinghe, M. Arianayagam, B. Canagasingham, A. Goolam, Nicola Jeffery, Mohamed Khadra, Raymond Ko, Nicholas Mehan, C. Varol, Jonathan Kam, Isaac A. Thangasamy
{"title":"Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia","authors":"Yam Ting Ho, J. Saad, Femi E. Ayeni, S. Ranasinghe, M. Arianayagam, B. Canagasingham, A. Goolam, Nicola Jeffery, Mohamed Khadra, Raymond Ko, Nicholas Mehan, C. Varol, Jonathan Kam, Isaac A. Thangasamy","doi":"10.3390/siuj5030029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the quality and readability of online information on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in managing benign prostate hyperplasia using the most-used search engine worldwide, Google. Methods: Google search terms “Holmium laser surgery” and “enlarged prostate” were used to generate 150 search results. Two independent authors (i) excluded any paywall, scientific literature, or advertisement and (ii) conducted an independent assessment on information quality, which was based on DISCERN, QUEST, and JAMA criteria, and readability, which was based on the FKG, GFI, SMOG, and FRE scores on qualified webpages. A third author was involved if there were any discrepancies between the assessments. Results: 107 qualified webpages were included in the data analysis. The median DISCERN score was 42 out of 80 (IQR 35–49). The median JAMA score was 0 out of 4 (IQR 0–1). The median QUEST score was 9 out of 28 (IQR 9–12). Using the non-parametric ANOVA and post hoc Games–Howell test, significant differences were identified between rankings of webpages. Sponsorship had no influence on the quality of webpages. The overall readability level required a minimum reading level of grade 11. Linear regression analysis showed that a higher ranked webpage is a positive predictor for all three quality assessment tools. Conclusions: The overall quality of online information on HoLEP is poor. We identify that the top-ranked google searches have a higher DISCERN score and are a positive predictor for DISCERN/QUEST/JAMA. Quality online information can benefit patients but should be used in conjunction with professional medical consultation.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5030029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality and readability of online information on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in managing benign prostate hyperplasia using the most-used search engine worldwide, Google. Methods: Google search terms “Holmium laser surgery” and “enlarged prostate” were used to generate 150 search results. Two independent authors (i) excluded any paywall, scientific literature, or advertisement and (ii) conducted an independent assessment on information quality, which was based on DISCERN, QUEST, and JAMA criteria, and readability, which was based on the FKG, GFI, SMOG, and FRE scores on qualified webpages. A third author was involved if there were any discrepancies between the assessments. Results: 107 qualified webpages were included in the data analysis. The median DISCERN score was 42 out of 80 (IQR 35–49). The median JAMA score was 0 out of 4 (IQR 0–1). The median QUEST score was 9 out of 28 (IQR 9–12). Using the non-parametric ANOVA and post hoc Games–Howell test, significant differences were identified between rankings of webpages. Sponsorship had no influence on the quality of webpages. The overall readability level required a minimum reading level of grade 11. Linear regression analysis showed that a higher ranked webpage is a positive predictor for all three quality assessment tools. Conclusions: The overall quality of online information on HoLEP is poor. We identify that the top-ranked google searches have a higher DISCERN score and are a positive predictor for DISCERN/QUEST/JAMA. Quality online information can benefit patients but should be used in conjunction with professional medical consultation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷歌搜索有关 HoLEP 治疗良性前列腺增生的信息的质量和可读性
目的:利用全球最常用的搜索引擎谷歌,评估有关前列腺钬激光去核术治疗良性前列腺增生的在线信息的质量和可读性。搜索方法使用谷歌搜索关键词 "钬激光手术 "和 "前列腺增生",共产生 150 条搜索结果。两位独立作者(i)排除了任何付费墙、科学文献或广告,(ii)对信息质量(基于 DISCERN、QUEST 和 JAMA 标准)和可读性(基于合格网页的 FKG、GFI、SMOG 和 FRE 分数)进行了独立评估。如果评估之间存在任何差异,第三位作者也会参与其中。结果共有 107 个合格网页被纳入数据分析。DISCERN 评分的中位数为 42 分(满分 80 分,IQR 为 35-49)。JAMA 评分中位数为 0 分(满分 4 分,IQR 0-1)。QUEST 评分中位数为 9 分(28 分)(IQR 9-12)。通过非参数方差分析和事后Games-Howell检验,发现网页排名之间存在显著差异。赞助对网页质量没有影响。总体可读性要求至少达到 11 年级的阅读水平。线性回归分析表明,排名较高的网页对所有三种质量评估工具都有积极的预测作用。结论关于 HoLEP 的在线信息总体质量较差。我们发现,排名靠前的谷歌搜索具有较高的 DISCERN 分数,并且对 DISCERN/QUEST/JAMA 具有积极的预测作用。高质量的在线信息可使患者受益,但应与专业医疗咨询结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Bladder Cancer Consultation with ChatGPT Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer RE: Prevalence of MRI Lesions in Men Responding to a GP-Led Invitation for a Prostate Health Check: A Prospective Cohort Study Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1