Comparing the effectiveness of oral montelukast versus cetirizine in the management of allergic rhino-conjunctivitis and its effect on quality of life among children: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Pushpika Jayawardana, T. Ponnamperuma
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of oral montelukast versus cetirizine in the management of allergic rhino-conjunctivitis and its effect on quality of life among children: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial","authors":"Pushpika Jayawardana, T. Ponnamperuma","doi":"10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (AR) is a common disorder in children, which causes significant morbidity and impact on learning and day-to-day activities.  Objectives: To compare effectiveness of montelukast versus cetirizine in AR and its effect on the quality of life (QoL) among children aged 6-12 years, attending Asthma Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. Method: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial; 'Group A' was given montelukast with a cetirizine dummy; 'Group B' was given cetirizine with a montelukast dummy. Primary endpoint was to compare improvement of nasal, eye and night symptom scores. Secondary endpoint was to compare the QoL between the groups. Total symptoms were assessed at baseline, one month, two months and three months. Results: There were 176 children (62.5% boys) with a mean age of 8.82 ± 1.79 years. Fifteen children were lost to follow-up, 7 from the montelukast and 8 from the cetirizine group. There was a significant reduction in all symptoms (p<0.05) every month in both treatment groups. Whilst montelukast group had more improved day and night symptom scores than cetirizine group, statistically significant improvement was seen only in the 3rd month (t-4.10 p <0.001). Mean QoL score showed no significant difference between the two groups at onset (montelukast 9.01±9.4 and cetirizine 15.9 ± 10.4; t-0.369; p=0.712). Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in all domains of QoL by completion of treatment (p<0.05). Upon completion, the montelukast group showed a significantly better QoL than the cetirizine group. Conclusions: Both cetirizine and montelukast showed remarkable improvement in the symptoms and better QoL in children. Study outcomes in all clinical domains and QoL were more significantly improved in montelukast group than in cetirizine group when treatment was continued for 3 months.","PeriodicalId":38870,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljch.v53i2.10802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (AR) is a common disorder in children, which causes significant morbidity and impact on learning and day-to-day activities.  Objectives: To compare effectiveness of montelukast versus cetirizine in AR and its effect on the quality of life (QoL) among children aged 6-12 years, attending Asthma Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. Method: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial; 'Group A' was given montelukast with a cetirizine dummy; 'Group B' was given cetirizine with a montelukast dummy. Primary endpoint was to compare improvement of nasal, eye and night symptom scores. Secondary endpoint was to compare the QoL between the groups. Total symptoms were assessed at baseline, one month, two months and three months. Results: There were 176 children (62.5% boys) with a mean age of 8.82 ± 1.79 years. Fifteen children were lost to follow-up, 7 from the montelukast and 8 from the cetirizine group. There was a significant reduction in all symptoms (p<0.05) every month in both treatment groups. Whilst montelukast group had more improved day and night symptom scores than cetirizine group, statistically significant improvement was seen only in the 3rd month (t-4.10 p <0.001). Mean QoL score showed no significant difference between the two groups at onset (montelukast 9.01±9.4 and cetirizine 15.9 ± 10.4; t-0.369; p=0.712). Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in all domains of QoL by completion of treatment (p<0.05). Upon completion, the montelukast group showed a significantly better QoL than the cetirizine group. Conclusions: Both cetirizine and montelukast showed remarkable improvement in the symptoms and better QoL in children. Study outcomes in all clinical domains and QoL were more significantly improved in montelukast group than in cetirizine group when treatment was continued for 3 months.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较口服孟鲁司特与西替利嗪治疗过敏性鼻结膜炎的疗效及其对儿童生活质量的影响:随机双盲临床试验
背景:过敏性鼻结膜炎(AR)是一种常见的儿童疾病,会导致严重的发病率,并对学习和日常活动造成影响。 研究目的:比较孟鲁司特和阿司匹林的疗效:比较孟鲁司特和西替利嗪治疗 AR 的疗效及其对斯里兰卡鲁胡纳大学医学院哮喘门诊 6-12 岁儿童生活质量(QoL)的影响。研究方法这是一项随机、双盲、平行分组试验;"A 组 "服用孟鲁司特和西替利嗪假药;"B 组 "服用西替利嗪和孟鲁司特假药。主要终点是比较鼻部、眼部和夜间症状评分的改善情况。次要终点是比较两组的 QoL。在基线、一个月、两个月和三个月时对总症状进行评估。结果176名儿童(62.5%为男孩)的平均年龄为(8.82 ± 1.79)岁。15名儿童失去了随访机会,其中7名来自孟鲁司特组,8名来自西替利嗪组。两个治疗组的所有症状每月都有明显减轻(P<0.05)。与西替利嗪组相比,孟鲁司特组的日间和夜间症状评分改善幅度更大,但只有在第 3 个月才出现统计学意义上的显著改善(t-4.10 p <0.001)。两组的平均 QoL 评分在发病时无明显差异(孟鲁司特 9.01±9.4,西替利嗪 15.9±10.4;t-0.369;p=0.712)。治疗结束时,两组患者的所有 QoL 领域均有显著改善(p<0.05)。完成治疗后,孟鲁司特组的 QoL 明显优于西替利嗪组。结论西替利嗪和孟鲁司特都能显著改善儿童的症状,提高其生活质量。持续治疗 3 个月后,孟鲁司特组在所有临床领域和 QoL 方面的研究结果都比西替利嗪组有更明显的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health
Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the only journal of child health in Sri Lanka. It is designed to publish original research articles and scholarly articles by recognized authorities on paediatric subjects. It is distributed widely in Sri Lanka and bears the ISSN number 1391-5452 for the print issues and e-ISSN 2386-110x for the electronic version in the internet. The journal is published quarterly and the articles are reviewed by both local and foreign peers. The Journal is the primary organ of Continuing Paediatric Medical Education in Sri Lanka.
期刊最新文献
Intelligence quotient in children with congenital hypothyroidism on treatment: A cross-sectional study Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A rare initial presentation of microscopic polyangiitis in a three-year-old girl Evaluation of the effectiveness of herbal and non-herbal oral formulations for the prevention of oral diseases in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis Paediatric liver transplantation in Sri Lanka; From an impossible dream to a lifesaving reality. The impact of the exodus of professionals on Sri Lankan Paediatric Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1