Social value framing of physical activity in European Member State policies: a content analysis

I. Ritchie, I. Nieto, M. Brunn, X. Mayo, A. Jimenez
{"title":"Social value framing of physical activity in European Member State policies: a content analysis","authors":"I. Ritchie, I. Nieto, M. Brunn, X. Mayo, A. Jimenez","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1415007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engagement in physical activity (PA) benefits physical and mental health as well as many other areas of society. In Europe however, 1/3 adults do not meet minimum PA recommendations. Social value, and its quantification through social return on investment (SROI) evidence, may be a useful framing to enhance PA promotion. This study aimed to assess the current use of social value framing of PA in European Union (EU) policies.Content analysis of 45 EU member state policies which contain reference to PA was conducted to evaluate the presence of five social value domains and SROI evidence. Data was analysed using manual inductive coding, supported by DeepL translation and NVivo tools.Social value framing was present to a certain extent in existing policies, with improved health being the most commonly referenced benefit of PA, followed by reference to social and community and then environmental benefits. Acknowledgement of the positive impacts of PA on wellbeing and education was the least present. Reference to SROI evidence was also limited. Generally, policies lacked holistic recognition of the social value of PA. Policies from the health sector were particularly limited in recognising the wider benefits of PA, whilst those from the environmental sector acknowledged the widest range of co-benefits.Adopting social value framing could be a useful approach for enhancing PA promotion. Whilst it is present to a certain extent in existing policy, this could be increased in terms of comprehensiveness to increase issue salience and multisectoral policy action.","PeriodicalId":509602,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1415007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engagement in physical activity (PA) benefits physical and mental health as well as many other areas of society. In Europe however, 1/3 adults do not meet minimum PA recommendations. Social value, and its quantification through social return on investment (SROI) evidence, may be a useful framing to enhance PA promotion. This study aimed to assess the current use of social value framing of PA in European Union (EU) policies.Content analysis of 45 EU member state policies which contain reference to PA was conducted to evaluate the presence of five social value domains and SROI evidence. Data was analysed using manual inductive coding, supported by DeepL translation and NVivo tools.Social value framing was present to a certain extent in existing policies, with improved health being the most commonly referenced benefit of PA, followed by reference to social and community and then environmental benefits. Acknowledgement of the positive impacts of PA on wellbeing and education was the least present. Reference to SROI evidence was also limited. Generally, policies lacked holistic recognition of the social value of PA. Policies from the health sector were particularly limited in recognising the wider benefits of PA, whilst those from the environmental sector acknowledged the widest range of co-benefits.Adopting social value framing could be a useful approach for enhancing PA promotion. Whilst it is present to a certain extent in existing policy, this could be increased in terms of comprehensiveness to increase issue salience and multisectoral policy action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲会员国政策中体育活动的社会价值框架:内容分析
参与体育活动(PA)有益于身心健康以及社会的许多其他领域。然而,在欧洲,1/3 的成年人没有达到最低限度的 PA 建议。社会价值,以及通过社会投资回报(SROI)证据对其进行量化,可能是加强体育锻炼推广的有用框架。本研究旨在评估目前欧盟(EU)政策中 PA 社会价值框架的使用情况。研究人员对包含 PA 内容的 45 个欧盟成员国的政策进行了内容分析,以评估是否存在五个社会价值领域和 SROI 证据。在 DeepL 翻译和 NVivo 工具的支持下,采用人工归纳编码法对数据进行了分析。社会价值框架在一定程度上存在于现有政策中,改善健康是 PA 最常提及的益处,其次是社会和社区益处,然后是环境益处。PA 对福利和教育的积极影响最少。对 SROI 证据的引用也很有限。一般来说,政策缺乏对 PA 社会价值的整体认识。卫生部门的政策在承认 PA 的更广泛益处方面尤其有限,而环境部门的政策则承认了最广泛的共同益处。采用社会价值框架可能是加强 PA 推广的有用方法。虽然在现有政策中存在一定程度的社会价值框架,但仍可提高其全面性,以增加问题的显著性和多部门政策行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychological risk factors for a first hamstring strain injury in soccer: a qualitative study NPCs in video games: a reflective resource for sports coaches and participant engagement Social media behaviors and body type ideals predict weight loss and food tracking behaviors among recreational climbers A competing risk survival analysis of the impacts of team formation on goals in professional football Evidence of weight loss in junior female judo athletes affects their development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1