Cultural repertoires and status safeguarding among rural middle-class parents

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1111/jomf.13016
Laura Backstrom
{"title":"Cultural repertoires and status safeguarding among rural middle-class parents","authors":"Laura Backstrom","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated how middle-class rural parents engaged in status safeguarding in an economically struggling rural community and how the parenting views and practices of rural return migrants impacted the community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rural communities seek college-educated returners to offset outmigration. We know little about how returners impact the community, especially if they return to raise children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study analyzed interview data from 15 white, college-educated parents between the ages of 25 and 38 who returned to their rural hometown to raise their children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All returners emphasized their children's choice regarding their future educational and occupational paths, and they equally valued college and skilled trades. In other ways, rural return migrants drew on distinct cultural repertoires in their childrearing strategies. Parents who had not lived in cities before returning relied on a localized cultural repertoire to engage in status safeguarding through reputation management as they monitored cross-class interactions and emphasized fitting in. In contrast, rural return migrants who had lived in cities drew on a cosmopolitan cultural repertoire that emphasized exposure to cultural amenities and engaged in cultural practices that they saw as distinguishing their children from the local community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although the return of college-educated residents is often celebrated, this study suggests that college-educated migrants may ultimately maintain inequalities within the community through social class or cultural exclusion based on their cultural repertoires.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 1","pages":"11-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated how middle-class rural parents engaged in status safeguarding in an economically struggling rural community and how the parenting views and practices of rural return migrants impacted the community.

Background

Rural communities seek college-educated returners to offset outmigration. We know little about how returners impact the community, especially if they return to raise children.

Method

This study analyzed interview data from 15 white, college-educated parents between the ages of 25 and 38 who returned to their rural hometown to raise their children.

Results

All returners emphasized their children's choice regarding their future educational and occupational paths, and they equally valued college and skilled trades. In other ways, rural return migrants drew on distinct cultural repertoires in their childrearing strategies. Parents who had not lived in cities before returning relied on a localized cultural repertoire to engage in status safeguarding through reputation management as they monitored cross-class interactions and emphasized fitting in. In contrast, rural return migrants who had lived in cities drew on a cosmopolitan cultural repertoire that emphasized exposure to cultural amenities and engaged in cultural practices that they saw as distinguishing their children from the local community.

Conclusion

Although the return of college-educated residents is often celebrated, this study suggests that college-educated migrants may ultimately maintain inequalities within the community through social class or cultural exclusion based on their cultural repertoires.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村中产阶级父母的文化传统与地位保障
本研究调查了在一个经济困难的农村社区中,农村中产阶级父母是如何维护自身地位的,以及农村返乡移民的育儿观点和做法是如何影响社区的。本研究分析了 15 位年龄在 25 岁至 38 岁之间、受过大学教育的白人父母的访谈数据,他们都回到农村老家抚养子女。所有回流者都强调子女可以选择未来的教育和职业道路,他们同样重视大学和技术行业。在其他方面,农村返乡移民在养育子女的策略上也借鉴了独特的文化传统。返乡前未在城市生活过的父母依靠本地化的文化剧目,通过声誉管理来维护地位,他们关注跨阶层的互动,并强调融入其中。与此相反,曾在城市生活过的农村返乡移民则利用世界性的文化剧目,强调接触文化设施,并参与他们认为能使其子女有别于当地社区的文化实践。虽然受过大学教育的居民返乡常常受到庆祝,但本研究表明,受过大学教育的移民可能会根据其文化剧目,通过社会阶层或文化排斥最终维持社区内的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information From the Editor Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods COVID-19 experiences and family resilience: A latent class analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1