Frederik Winkelkotte, Lukas Baumann, Michelle Grengel, Jan Jochmaring, Jana York
{"title":"Use and acceptance of technologies in the German measure supported employment","authors":"Frederik Winkelkotte, Lukas Baumann, Michelle Grengel, Jan Jochmaring, Jana York","doi":"10.3233/jvr-240022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The measure Supported Employment (SE) and digitalization offer people with disabilities increased opportunities for participation in working life. Different technology acceptance models such as the TAM or UTAUT indicate that whether a technology is used or not crucially depends on various factors such as the perceived usefulness or perceived ease of use of a technology. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate factors influencing the acceptance of digital technologies in the measure SE. Risks and opportunities for people with disabilities are examined. METHODS: The data basis consists of 16 qualitative guided interviews with job coaches and clients. The data evaluation is carried out by means of qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In line with the TAM and the UTAUT, six main factors could be identified as relevant for the acceptance of digital technologies in the measure SE: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes toward using, social influence, facilitating conditions, and individual factors seem to influence the actual use of technologies. The interviews show opportunities such as increased participation of people with disabilities in working life through technologies, but also risks such as the exclusion of older or less experienced people. CONCLUSION: Factors from technology acceptance research also apply in SE and must be recognized before introducing new technologies.","PeriodicalId":506948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation","volume":"274 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-240022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The measure Supported Employment (SE) and digitalization offer people with disabilities increased opportunities for participation in working life. Different technology acceptance models such as the TAM or UTAUT indicate that whether a technology is used or not crucially depends on various factors such as the perceived usefulness or perceived ease of use of a technology. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate factors influencing the acceptance of digital technologies in the measure SE. Risks and opportunities for people with disabilities are examined. METHODS: The data basis consists of 16 qualitative guided interviews with job coaches and clients. The data evaluation is carried out by means of qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In line with the TAM and the UTAUT, six main factors could be identified as relevant for the acceptance of digital technologies in the measure SE: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes toward using, social influence, facilitating conditions, and individual factors seem to influence the actual use of technologies. The interviews show opportunities such as increased participation of people with disabilities in working life through technologies, but also risks such as the exclusion of older or less experienced people. CONCLUSION: Factors from technology acceptance research also apply in SE and must be recognized before introducing new technologies.
背景:辅助就业(SE)和数字化措施为残疾人提供了更多参与工作生活的机会。不同的技术接受模型(如 TAM 或 UTAUT)表明,一项技术的使用与否主要取决于各种因素,如感知到的技术有用性或感知到的技术易用性。目的:本研究旨在调查影响测量 SE 中数字技术接受度的因素。研究还探讨了残疾人面临的风险和机遇。方法:数据基础包括对就业指导人员和客户进行的 16 次定性指导访谈。数据评估通过定性内容分析进行。结果:根据 TAM 和 UTAUT,在衡量 SE 的过程中,可以确定与接受数字技术相关的六个主要因素:感知有用性、感知易用性、使用态度、社会影响、便利条件和个人因素似乎会影响技术的实际使用。访谈显示了一些机遇,如通过技术提高残疾人在工作生活中的参与度,但也存在一些风险,如将老年人或经验不足的人排除在外。结论:技术接受度研究中的因素同样适用于社会经济领域,在引入新技术之前必须认识到这些因素。