USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS TO CLASSIFY SOME ARAB COUNTRIES INTO HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS ACCORDING TO INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY CRITERIA

Abada Abderraouf, Bentadjine Mohammed Abderrahmane, Hamidat Amar, Grounga Oualid
{"title":"USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS TO CLASSIFY SOME ARAB COUNTRIES INTO HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS ACCORDING TO INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY CRITERIA","authors":"Abada Abderraouf, Bentadjine Mohammed Abderrahmane, Hamidat Amar, Grounga Oualid","doi":"10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i5.4754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the application of cluster analysis in categorizing select Arab countries into cohesive groups based on institutional quality criteria, which consist of six indicators measuring good governance in country. These indicators cover various dimensions and allow describing the quality of services provided by the state in a specific area comprehensively. These dimensions include the scope of state intervention, these dimensions are The Political Dimension, The Economic Dimension and The Legal Dimension. \n  \nMethod: This study adopts a research methodology that combines both descriptive and quantitative approaches. The descriptive approach is based on presenting concepts and describing relationships among institutional quality criteria. The quantitative approach involves using cluster analysis methods: K-Means clustering and Hierarchical Clustering to classify 11 Arab countries: UAE, Bahrain, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, and Yemen. This was done to conduct cluster analysis to test the homogeneity of these countries regarding institutional quality determinants, represented by the following variables: Participation and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Legislative Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption. \n  \nResults and Discussion: The study reached the following results: \n- the K-Means Cluster Analysis Method is evident that The total number of cases classified in each cluster: Eleven countries were classified into seven countries: United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Jordan, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia in the first cluster and four countries in the second cluster: Algeria, Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen; \n-the variable Participation and Accountability does not significantly affect the classification of the Arab countries under study into homogeneous groups according to institutional quality indicators. However, variables such as Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Legislative Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption play a significant role in this classification; \n- the Hierarchical Clustering Analysis Method is evident that the Arab countries under   study are distributed into two homogeneous groups. The first group forms Cluster 1, consisting of Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Egypt, the UAE, and Qatar. The second group belongs to Cluster 2, comprising Sudan and Yemen. This classification is based on institutional quality criteria. \n  \nOriginality/Value: This study sheds light on the importance of cluster analysis methods: the K-Means Cluster Analysis Method and the hierarchical cluster analysis method in classifying Arab countries according to the determinants of institutional quality, which are considered a determining factor for the economic growth of countries, and its consequent impact on various indicators reflecting economic, social, and political conditions. Consequently, institutional quality has emerged as a pivotal measure in highlighting developmental disparities among different countries. Many governments are endeavoring to create or adopt models to enhance the quality of their institutions, notwithstanding the similarities among Arab countries.","PeriodicalId":31480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","volume":"52 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i5.4754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore the application of cluster analysis in categorizing select Arab countries into cohesive groups based on institutional quality criteria, which consist of six indicators measuring good governance in country. These indicators cover various dimensions and allow describing the quality of services provided by the state in a specific area comprehensively. These dimensions include the scope of state intervention, these dimensions are The Political Dimension, The Economic Dimension and The Legal Dimension.   Method: This study adopts a research methodology that combines both descriptive and quantitative approaches. The descriptive approach is based on presenting concepts and describing relationships among institutional quality criteria. The quantitative approach involves using cluster analysis methods: K-Means clustering and Hierarchical Clustering to classify 11 Arab countries: UAE, Bahrain, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tunisia, and Yemen. This was done to conduct cluster analysis to test the homogeneity of these countries regarding institutional quality determinants, represented by the following variables: Participation and Accountability, Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Legislative Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption.   Results and Discussion: The study reached the following results: - the K-Means Cluster Analysis Method is evident that The total number of cases classified in each cluster: Eleven countries were classified into seven countries: United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Jordan, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Tunisia in the first cluster and four countries in the second cluster: Algeria, Egypt, Sudan, and Yemen; -the variable Participation and Accountability does not significantly affect the classification of the Arab countries under study into homogeneous groups according to institutional quality indicators. However, variables such as Political Stability and Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Legislative Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption play a significant role in this classification; - the Hierarchical Clustering Analysis Method is evident that the Arab countries under   study are distributed into two homogeneous groups. The first group forms Cluster 1, consisting of Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Egypt, the UAE, and Qatar. The second group belongs to Cluster 2, comprising Sudan and Yemen. This classification is based on institutional quality criteria.   Originality/Value: This study sheds light on the importance of cluster analysis methods: the K-Means Cluster Analysis Method and the hierarchical cluster analysis method in classifying Arab countries according to the determinants of institutional quality, which are considered a determining factor for the economic growth of countries, and its consequent impact on various indicators reflecting economic, social, and political conditions. Consequently, institutional quality has emerged as a pivotal measure in highlighting developmental disparities among different countries. Many governments are endeavoring to create or adopt models to enhance the quality of their institutions, notwithstanding the similarities among Arab countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用聚类分析根据机构质量标准将一些阿拉伯国家划分为同类组别
研究目的本研究的目的是探讨如何应用聚类分析,根据衡量国家善治的六项指标组成的机构质量标准,将选定的阿拉伯国家划分为具有凝聚力的组别。这些指标涵盖多个方面,可以全面描述国家在特定领域提供的服务质量。这些维度包括国家干预的范围,即政治维度、经济维度和法律维度。 研究方法:本研究采用描述性方法和定量方法相结合的研究方法。描述性方法以提出概念和描述机构质量标准之间的关系为基础。定量方法包括使用聚类分析方法:K-Means 聚类和层次聚类对 11 个阿拉伯国家进行分类:阿联酋、巴林、阿尔及利亚、埃及、约旦、摩洛哥、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯、苏丹、突尼斯和也门。这样做是为了进行聚类分析,以检验这些国家在制度质量决定因素方面的同质性,这些因素由以下变量代表:参与和问责制、政治稳定和无暴力、政府效率、立法质量、法治、腐败控制。 结果与讨论:研究得出以下结果:- 通过 K-Means 聚类分析法可以看出,每个聚类的案例总数:11 个国家被划分为 7 个国家:阿拉伯联合酋长国、巴林、约旦、摩洛哥、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯和突尼斯为第一聚类,四个国家为第二聚类:参与和问责这一变量对根据机构质量指标将所研究的阿拉伯国家划分为同类组没有显著影响。但是,政治稳定和无暴力、政府效率、监管质量、立法质量、法治和腐败控制等变量在这一分类中发挥了重要作用;--层次聚类分析方法表明,所研究的阿拉伯国家分布为两个同质组。第一组为第 1 组,包括约旦、摩洛哥、突尼斯、巴林、沙特阿拉伯、阿尔及利亚、埃及、阿联酋和卡塔尔。第二组属于第 2 组,包括苏丹和也门。这种分类以机构质量标准为基础。 原创性/价值:本研究揭示了聚类分析方法的重要性:K-均值聚类分析方法和层次聚类分析方法可根据制度质量的决定因素对阿拉伯国家进行分类,制度质量被认为是国家经济增长的决定性因素,其对反映经济、社会和政治状况的各种指标也会产生影响。因此,机构质量已成为突出不同国家之间发展差距的关键衡量标准。尽管阿拉伯国家之间存在相似之处,但许多国家的政府都在努力创造或采用提高机构质量的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Professional Business Review
International Journal of Professional Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
RESOURCE CAPACITY PLANNING AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE PROCUREMENT AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE IN LAIKIPIA COUNTY, KENYA THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS INCUBATORS IN ACCOMPANYING AND SUPPORTING THE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS IN THE LIGHT OF DECREE 1275 – A PILOT STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GHARDAIA UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1