Physical education pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning about the spectrum of teaching styles and its role in their pedagogical awareness and practice

Kelly L. Simonton, Kanae Haneishi, Aimee Gray, Celina Espinoza
{"title":"Physical education pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning about the spectrum of teaching styles and its role in their pedagogical awareness and practice","authors":"Kelly L. Simonton, Kanae Haneishi, Aimee Gray, Celina Espinoza","doi":"10.1177/1356336x241255189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine physical education pre-service teachers’ (PSTs’) beliefs about the usefulness of the spectrum of teaching styles (also referred to as The Spectrum; Mosston and Ashworth, 2008 ) and their perceived abilities to use each style. Using a series of foregrounding techniques based on The Spectrum, PSTs’ ( N = 34) experiences with the teaching styles were explored over one academic semester using a mixed methods approach ( Creswell and Plano Clark, 2018 ). The participants completed a pre/post survey (validated instrument) before and after the semester to record their perceptions of each teaching style. All participants answered several open-ended questions and completed a series of video-based lesson reflections, and 15 of the 34 participants were interviewed individually about their experiences. The results reflected significant increases in the PSTs’ perceived ability to use styles A, B, and F. Qualitative themes were: (1) instructional comfortability from early and frequent experiences learning about and using The Spectrum; (2) a heightened desire to utilize styles with K-12 students; (3) a desire for more support in understanding the alignment between style choice and learning objectives; and (4) an interest in knowing how to connect The Spectrum with curriculum models. The results suggest that there is likely a developmental process for PSTs in learning about and applying The Spectrum. A relationship also appears to be present between using The Spectrum in conjunction with models-based practices. Foregrounding PSTs’ learning within The Spectrum can ease planning anxiety more intentionally and effectively, which can in turn increase the pedagogical accountability of PSTs.","PeriodicalId":507703,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"73 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x241255189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine physical education pre-service teachers’ (PSTs’) beliefs about the usefulness of the spectrum of teaching styles (also referred to as The Spectrum; Mosston and Ashworth, 2008 ) and their perceived abilities to use each style. Using a series of foregrounding techniques based on The Spectrum, PSTs’ ( N = 34) experiences with the teaching styles were explored over one academic semester using a mixed methods approach ( Creswell and Plano Clark, 2018 ). The participants completed a pre/post survey (validated instrument) before and after the semester to record their perceptions of each teaching style. All participants answered several open-ended questions and completed a series of video-based lesson reflections, and 15 of the 34 participants were interviewed individually about their experiences. The results reflected significant increases in the PSTs’ perceived ability to use styles A, B, and F. Qualitative themes were: (1) instructional comfortability from early and frequent experiences learning about and using The Spectrum; (2) a heightened desire to utilize styles with K-12 students; (3) a desire for more support in understanding the alignment between style choice and learning objectives; and (4) an interest in knowing how to connect The Spectrum with curriculum models. The results suggest that there is likely a developmental process for PSTs in learning about and applying The Spectrum. A relationship also appears to be present between using The Spectrum in conjunction with models-based practices. Foregrounding PSTs’ learning within The Spectrum can ease planning anxiety more intentionally and effectively, which can in turn increase the pedagogical accountability of PSTs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育教育职前教师对教学风格谱系的学习感悟及其在教学意识和实践中的作用
本研究旨在考察体育教育职前教师(PSTs)对教学风格谱系(也称为 "谱系";Mosston 和 Ashworth,2008 年)有用性的信念,以及他们使用每种教学风格的感知能力。使用一系列基于光谱的前景技术,采用混合方法(Creswell 和 Plano Clark,2018 年)探索了 PST(N = 34)在一个学期中使用教学风格的经验。参与者在学期前和学期后填写了一份前后调查表(验证工具),以记录他们对每种教学风格的看法。所有参与者都回答了几个开放式问题,并完成了一系列基于视频的课程反思,34 名参与者中有 15 人就他们的经历接受了单独访谈。结果显示,PST 使用 A、B 和 F 教学风格的能力明显提高:(1)通过早期和经常学习和使用 "光谱 "的经验,获得了教学上的舒适感;(2)增强了对 K-12 学生使用风格的愿望;(3)希望在理解风格选择与学习目标之间的一致性方面获得更多支持;以及(4)有兴趣了解如何将 "光谱 "与课程模式联系起来。研究结果表明,PST 在学习和应用 "光谱 "方面可能有一个发展过程。将光谱与基于模式的实践结合起来使用似乎也存在着某种关系。将 PST 的学习放在 "光谱 "的前面,可以更有意识、更有效地缓解计划焦虑,从而增强 PST 的教学责任感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical education pre-service teachers’ perceptions of learning about the spectrum of teaching styles and its role in their pedagogical awareness and practice Growth trajectories and roles of expectancy, task value, and cost in middle-school physical education Formative and shared assessment: Literature review on the main contributions in physical education and physical education teacher education Understanding (and extending) the conceptual boundaries of policy research in physical education: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1