Stabilization of Pavement Subgrade Clay Soil Using Sugarcane Ash and Lime

Abrar Ahmed, Magdi El-Emam, Naveed Ahmad, M. Attom
{"title":"Stabilization of Pavement Subgrade Clay Soil Using Sugarcane Ash and Lime","authors":"Abrar Ahmed, Magdi El-Emam, Naveed Ahmad, M. Attom","doi":"10.3390/geosciences14060151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soft to medium clay soil possesses major sources of damages to the pavement layers overlying them because of their potential failure under moisture changes and external heavy traffic load. In such situations, soil stabilization methods can be used to improve the soil properties and satisfy the desired engineering requirements. This study presents the use of sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) and lime as chemical stabilizers for a clay soil subbase. Sugarcane bagasse ash and lime are used individually and as mixtures at varying percentages to stabilize a clay soil from Taxila, Pakistan. Various geotechnical laboratory tests such as Atterberg limits, compaction test, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) are carried out on both pure and stabilized soils. These tests are performed at 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5% of either SBA or lime by weight of dry soil. In addition, mixtures of lime and SBA in ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 1:2, and 1:3 are used in 5%, 7.5%, and 10% of dry soil weight, respectively. Results indicate that soil improved with 7.5% SBA showed a 28% increase in the liquid limit, while soil mixed with 2.5% lime in combination with 7.5% SBA showed an increase of 40% in the plastic limit. For the plasticity index, the soil mixed with 7.5% SBA showed an increase of 42%. Moreover, 2.5% lime in combination with 2.5% SBA showed the best improvement in soil consistency as this mixture reduced the soil plasticity from high to low according to the plasticity chart. Furthermore, 2.5% SBA in combination with 5% lime demonstrated the largest improvement on the CBR value, which is about a 69% increase above that of the pure soil. Finally, the cost analysis indicates a promising improvement method that reduces pavement cost, increases design life, and mitigates issues of energy consumption and pollution related to SBA as a solid waste material.","PeriodicalId":509137,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences","volume":"106 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14060151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft to medium clay soil possesses major sources of damages to the pavement layers overlying them because of their potential failure under moisture changes and external heavy traffic load. In such situations, soil stabilization methods can be used to improve the soil properties and satisfy the desired engineering requirements. This study presents the use of sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) and lime as chemical stabilizers for a clay soil subbase. Sugarcane bagasse ash and lime are used individually and as mixtures at varying percentages to stabilize a clay soil from Taxila, Pakistan. Various geotechnical laboratory tests such as Atterberg limits, compaction test, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) are carried out on both pure and stabilized soils. These tests are performed at 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5% of either SBA or lime by weight of dry soil. In addition, mixtures of lime and SBA in ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 1:2, and 1:3 are used in 5%, 7.5%, and 10% of dry soil weight, respectively. Results indicate that soil improved with 7.5% SBA showed a 28% increase in the liquid limit, while soil mixed with 2.5% lime in combination with 7.5% SBA showed an increase of 40% in the plastic limit. For the plasticity index, the soil mixed with 7.5% SBA showed an increase of 42%. Moreover, 2.5% lime in combination with 2.5% SBA showed the best improvement in soil consistency as this mixture reduced the soil plasticity from high to low according to the plasticity chart. Furthermore, 2.5% SBA in combination with 5% lime demonstrated the largest improvement on the CBR value, which is about a 69% increase above that of the pure soil. Finally, the cost analysis indicates a promising improvement method that reduces pavement cost, increases design life, and mitigates issues of energy consumption and pollution related to SBA as a solid waste material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用甘蔗灰和石灰稳定路面基层粘土
软土和中粘土是上覆路面层的主要破坏源,因为它们在湿度变化和外部重交通荷载的作用下有可能失效。在这种情况下,可以采用土壤稳定方法来改善土壤性质,满足所需的工程要求。本研究介绍了使用甘蔗渣灰(SBA)和石灰作为粘土路基的化学稳定剂。甘蔗渣灰和石灰以不同的比例单独或混合使用,用于稳定巴基斯坦塔克西拉的粘土。对纯土和稳定土进行了各种土工实验室测试,如阿特伯格极限、压实试验和加州承载比(CBR)。这些测试是按干土重量的 2.5%、5% 和 7.5% 的 SBA 或石灰含量进行的。此外,石灰和 SBA 的混合物比例分别为 1:1、2:1、3:1、1:2 和 1:3,分别占干土重量的 5%、7.5% 和 10%。结果表明,使用 7.5% SBA 改良土壤的液限提高了 28%,而混合了 2.5% 石灰和 7.5% SBA 的土壤的塑限提高了 40%。在塑性指数方面,混有 7.5% SBA 的土壤增加了 42%。此外,2.5% 的石灰与 2.5% 的 SBA 混合物对土壤稠度的改善效果最好,因为根据塑性图,这种混合物能将土壤塑性从高降到低。此外,2.5% 的 SBA 与 5%的石灰混合使用对 CBR 值的改善最大,比纯土壤的 CBR 值提高了约 69%。最后,成本分析表明,这是一种很有前景的改良方法,它可以降低路面成本、延长设计寿命,还能减少与固体废弃物 SBA 相关的能源消耗和污染问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neural Network-Based Climate Prediction for the 21st Century Using the Finnish Multi-Millennial Tree-Ring Chronology Analysis of Debris Flow Protective Barriers Using the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian Method The Perspective of Using Neural Networks and Machine Learning Algorithms for Modelling and Forecasting the Quality Parameters of Coking Coal—A Case Study Identification and Verification of the Movement of the Hidden Active Fault Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Excavation A Unique Conditions Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1