Neurocognitive Test Performance in relation to symptom severity and age of onset of trichotillomania

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892
Emily J. Carlson , Elizabeth J. Malloy , Jon Grant , David A.F. Haaga
{"title":"Neurocognitive Test Performance in relation to symptom severity and age of onset of trichotillomania","authors":"Emily J. Carlson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Malloy ,&nbsp;Jon Grant ,&nbsp;David A.F. Haaga","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (<em>N</em> = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (N = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经认知测试成绩与症状严重程度和毛发增多症发病年龄的关系
之前的研究发现,在将嗜毛妄想症(TTM)患者与健康对比组进行比较时,神经认知障碍的结果并不一致,尤其是在反应抑制和集合转移方面。本研究使用了一项 TTM 行为疗法临床试验的基线数据(N = 36),以检验这些不一致结果的两种可能解释:(a)只有症状较严重的 TTM 患者才会出现神经认知缺陷;(b)发病年龄与反应抑制和集合转换的缺陷有不同关系。结果与这些假设不一致。发病年龄与神经认知评估均无明显相关性。受访者对 TTM 症状严重程度或受损程度的评分与神经认知测试成绩无显著相关性。自我报告的症状严重程度与运动反应抑制显著相关,但方向与我们的预期相反,即抑制主导反应的反应时间越快,症状越严重。讨论主要集中在几种可能的解释上,包括(a)测量方法或(b)本研究未测量的多动症合并症患病率在不同样本间的差异,这些都可能解释 TTM 神经心理学特征的不同结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1