Comparison of associations between alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome according to three definitions: The Swedish INTERGENE study

Alina Skultecka , Fredrik Nyberg , Lauren Lissner , Maria Rosvall , Dag S. Thelle , Anna-Carin Olin , Kjell Torén , Lena Björck , Annika Rosengren , Kirsten Mehlig
{"title":"Comparison of associations between alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome according to three definitions: The Swedish INTERGENE study","authors":"Alina Skultecka ,&nbsp;Fredrik Nyberg ,&nbsp;Lauren Lissner ,&nbsp;Maria Rosvall ,&nbsp;Dag S. Thelle ,&nbsp;Anna-Carin Olin ,&nbsp;Kjell Torén ,&nbsp;Lena Björck ,&nbsp;Annika Rosengren ,&nbsp;Kirsten Mehlig","doi":"10.1016/j.metop.2024.100292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While prevalence estimates differ by definition of metabolic syndrome (MetS), it is less clear how different definitions affect associations with alcohol consumption.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included 3051 adults aged 25–77 from the baseline examination of the Swedish INTERGENE cohort (2001–2004). Using multiple logistic regression, we investigated cross-sectional associations between ethanol intake and MetS defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the Joint Interim Statement (JIS). Alcohol exposure categories comprised abstinence, and low, medium, and high consumption defined via sex-specific tertiles of ethanol intake among current consumers. Covariates included sociodemographics, health, and lifestyle factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MetS prevalence estimates varied between 13.9 % (ATP III) and 25.3 % (JIS), with higher prevalence in men than women. Adjusted for age and sex, medium-high alcohol consumption was associated with lower odds of MetS compared to low consumption, while no difference was observed for abstainers. Only the most specific (and thus severe) definition of MetS (ATP III) showed decreasing odds for ethanol intake when adjusted for all covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study shows that alcohol-related associations differ by definition of MetS. The finding that individuals with the most stringently defined MetS may benefit from alcohol consumption calls for further well-controlled studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94141,"journal":{"name":"Metabolism open","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936824000240/pdfft?md5=5ae0a8d899fa1433ff6f3e96c1a28a63&pid=1-s2.0-S2589936824000240-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolism open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589936824000240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While prevalence estimates differ by definition of metabolic syndrome (MetS), it is less clear how different definitions affect associations with alcohol consumption.

Methods

We included 3051 adults aged 25–77 from the baseline examination of the Swedish INTERGENE cohort (2001–2004). Using multiple logistic regression, we investigated cross-sectional associations between ethanol intake and MetS defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and the Joint Interim Statement (JIS). Alcohol exposure categories comprised abstinence, and low, medium, and high consumption defined via sex-specific tertiles of ethanol intake among current consumers. Covariates included sociodemographics, health, and lifestyle factors.

Results

MetS prevalence estimates varied between 13.9 % (ATP III) and 25.3 % (JIS), with higher prevalence in men than women. Adjusted for age and sex, medium-high alcohol consumption was associated with lower odds of MetS compared to low consumption, while no difference was observed for abstainers. Only the most specific (and thus severe) definition of MetS (ATP III) showed decreasing odds for ethanol intake when adjusted for all covariates.

Conclusion

Our study shows that alcohol-related associations differ by definition of MetS. The finding that individuals with the most stringently defined MetS may benefit from alcohol consumption calls for further well-controlled studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据三种定义比较饮酒与代谢综合征之间的关系:瑞典 INTERGENE 研究
背景虽然代谢综合征(MetS)的定义不同,患病率估计值也不同,但不同的定义如何影响与饮酒量的关联却不太清楚。方法我们纳入了瑞典 INTERGENE 队列(2001-2004 年)基线检查中年龄在 25-77 岁之间的 3051 名成年人。我们使用多元逻辑回归法研究了乙醇摄入量与根据成人治疗小组 III(ATP III)、国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)和联合临时声明(JIS)定义的 MetS 之间的横断面关联。酒精暴露类别包括戒酒、低、中、高消费,根据当前消费者中乙醇摄入量的性别特异性分层定义。协变量包括社会人口学、健康和生活方式因素。结果MetS流行率估计值介于13.9%(ATP III)和25.3%(JIS)之间,男性高于女性。根据年龄和性别进行调整后发现,与低度饮酒相比,中高度饮酒者患 MetS 的几率较低,而戒酒者则无差异。在对所有协变量进行调整后,只有 MetS(ATP III)中最特殊(因此也是最严重)的定义显示乙醇摄入的几率降低。我们的研究表明,与酒精相关的关联因 MetS 的定义不同而异。对 MetS 定义最严格的人可能会从饮酒中获益,这一发现需要进一步的对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolism open
Metabolism open Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General), Endocrinology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Outdoor environment and obesity: A review of current evidence Understanding the impact of diabetes on bone health: A clinical review Impact of allulose on blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of clinical trials The role of novel inflammation-associated biomarkers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy Growth hormone attenuates obesity and reshapes gut microbiota in high-fat diet-fed mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1