Nerve-sparing surgery in deep endometriosis: Has its time come?

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102506
{"title":"Nerve-sparing surgery in deep endometriosis: Has its time come?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Nerve-sparing (NS) surgery was first introduced for the treatment of deep endometriosis<span> (DE) 20 years ago, drawing on established neuroanatomy and success from oncological applications. It aims to identify and preserve </span></span>autonomic nerve<span> fibres, reduce iatrogenic nerve injury, and minimize postoperative visceral dysfunction, without compromising the therapeutic effectiveness against endometriosis. The evolution of NS surgical techniques over the past two decades has been supported by an expanding body of literature on anatomical details, dissection techniques, and functional outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that NS surgery results in reduced postoperative voiding dysfunction (POVD). Transient POVD may be influenced by preoperative dysfunction, with parametrial infiltration being a strong </span></span>predictive factor<span> for POVD. While the benefits in bowel and sexual functions are less pronounced and consistent, NS surgery potentially prevents de novo dysfunctions in these areas. Furthermore, perioperative complication rates, effectiveness in pain relief, and fertility outcomes are reportedly on par with conventional surgery.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152169342400052X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nerve-sparing (NS) surgery was first introduced for the treatment of deep endometriosis (DE) 20 years ago, drawing on established neuroanatomy and success from oncological applications. It aims to identify and preserve autonomic nerve fibres, reduce iatrogenic nerve injury, and minimize postoperative visceral dysfunction, without compromising the therapeutic effectiveness against endometriosis. The evolution of NS surgical techniques over the past two decades has been supported by an expanding body of literature on anatomical details, dissection techniques, and functional outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that NS surgery results in reduced postoperative voiding dysfunction (POVD). Transient POVD may be influenced by preoperative dysfunction, with parametrial infiltration being a strong predictive factor for POVD. While the benefits in bowel and sexual functions are less pronounced and consistent, NS surgery potentially prevents de novo dysfunctions in these areas. Furthermore, perioperative complication rates, effectiveness in pain relief, and fertility outcomes are reportedly on par with conventional surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深部子宫内膜异位症的保留神经手术:时机成熟了吗?
20 年前,神经保留(NS)手术首次用于治疗深部子宫内膜异位症(DE),它借鉴了神经解剖学的成熟经验和肿瘤学的成功应用。其目的是在不影响子宫内膜异位症治疗效果的前提下,识别并保留自主神经纤维,减少先天性神经损伤,并将术后内脏功能障碍降至最低。在过去的二十年中,NS 手术技术的发展得到了有关解剖细节、解剖技术和功能结果的大量文献的支持。最近的证据表明,NS手术可减少术后排尿功能障碍(POVD)。短暂的排尿功能障碍可能受术前功能障碍的影响,宫旁浸润是预测排尿功能障碍的一个重要因素。虽然对肠道和性功能的益处不那么明显和一致,但NS手术有可能防止这些方面出现新的功能障碍。此外,据报道,围手术期并发症发生率、疼痛缓解效果和生育结果与传统手术相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
期刊最新文献
Post pregnancy family planning in Latin America and the Caribbean analysis and strengths in training on immediate contraception post obstetric event by CLAP/PAHO Fetal therapies – (Stem cell transplantation; enzyme replacement therapy; in utero genetic therapies) Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testing Prenatal detection of copy number variants Impact of prenatal genomics on clinical genetics practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1