Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties

IF 13.7 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459

Simon Felix , Kevin-Marc Valery , Meryl Caiada , Sarah Guionnet , Julien Bonilla-Guerrero , Jean-Marc Destaillats , Antoinette Prouteau

{"title":"Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties","authors":"Simon Felix , Kevin-Marc Valery , Meryl Caiada , Sarah Guionnet , Julien Bonilla-Guerrero , Jean-Marc Destaillats , Antoinette Prouteau","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Personal recovery represents a paradigm shift in mental healthcare. Validated self-report outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to facilitate the transformation towards recovery-oriented practices and services. Objectives were to identify published measures and analyze their measurement properties using a standardized methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following the COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of personal recovery PROMs in serious mental illness. The MEDLINE, PMC, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PBSC and Scopus electronic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and February 2024. Full-text articles from a previous systematic review were also examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>91 studies were included in the review, describing 25 PROMs. Ten of them had not been identified in previous reviews. Quality of evidence was globally poor for most PROM measurement properties. Very little evidence was found for cross-cultural validity, measurement invariance, measurement error and criterion validity. The Recovery Assessment Scale and Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery showed the strongest evidence for sufficient psychometric data on a wide range of measurement properties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Several personal recovery measures are now available. While research is still needed to enhance their validity on some psychometric properties, the current tools appear sufficient to cover most research and clinical needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102459"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000801","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Personal recovery represents a paradigm shift in mental healthcare. Validated self-report outcome measures (PROMs) are needed to facilitate the transformation towards recovery-oriented practices and services. Objectives were to identify published measures and analyze their measurement properties using a standardized methodology.

Methods

Following the COSMIN guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of personal recovery PROMs in serious mental illness. The MEDLINE, PMC, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PBSC and Scopus electronic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and February 2024. Full-text articles from a previous systematic review were also examined.

Results

91 studies were included in the review, describing 25 PROMs. Ten of them had not been identified in previous reviews. Quality of evidence was globally poor for most PROM measurement properties. Very little evidence was found for cross-cultural validity, measurement invariance, measurement error and criterion validity. The Recovery Assessment Scale and Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery showed the strongest evidence for sufficient psychometric data on a wide range of measurement properties.

Conclusions

Several personal recovery measures are now available. While research is still needed to enhance their validity on some psychometric properties, the current tools appear sufficient to cover most research and clinical needs.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

严重精神疾病患者的个人康复自我报告结果测量：测量特性的系统回顾

背景个人康复代表着精神医疗保健模式的转变。需要经过验证的自我报告结果测量方法（PROMs）来促进向以康复为导向的实践和服务转变。方法根据 COSMIN 指南，我们对严重精神疾病患者的个人康复 PROM 进行了系统性回顾。我们在 MEDLINE、PMC、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、PBSC 和 Scopus 电子数据库中检索了 2012 年 5 月至 2024 年 2 月间发表的文章。结果91项研究被纳入综述，其中描述了25种PROMs。其中有 10 项研究在之前的综述中没有发现。大多数 PROM 测量属性的证据质量普遍较差。在跨文化效度、测量不变性、测量误差和标准效度方面发现的证据很少。康复评估量表和康复过程问卷显示了最有力的证据，表明在广泛的测量属性方面有足够的心理测量数据。虽然仍需进行研究以提高其某些心理测量属性的有效性，但目前的工具似乎足以满足大多数研究和临床需求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.