Shockvertising: Trajectory of a controversial advertising technique

Thao Bui-Nguyen, Roland Canu
{"title":"Shockvertising: Trajectory of a controversial advertising technique","authors":"Thao Bui-Nguyen, Roland Canu","doi":"10.1177/20515707241243159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to look back at a controversial advertising technique recognized today as an ordinary advertising tool: shockvertising. Using a historical approach, we have built an analytical corpus that covers more than a century of research published in Marketing and advertising on the use of shock. A qualitative examination of this corpus has enabled us to sketch an institutional trajectory for shockvertising, dividing its evolution into several periods. We can thus observe the gradual acceptance of a technique initially condemned by the first advertising professionals, then the segmentation of this technique and its gradual assignment to specific marketing territories, and finally, the questioning of its effectiveness and criticism of its acceptability by new consumer figures anxious to defend and express specific social values. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and opens up new research perspectives on the theme of shockvertising.","PeriodicalId":509922,"journal":{"name":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","volume":"12 18","pages":"30 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241243159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to look back at a controversial advertising technique recognized today as an ordinary advertising tool: shockvertising. Using a historical approach, we have built an analytical corpus that covers more than a century of research published in Marketing and advertising on the use of shock. A qualitative examination of this corpus has enabled us to sketch an institutional trajectory for shockvertising, dividing its evolution into several periods. We can thus observe the gradual acceptance of a technique initially condemned by the first advertising professionals, then the segmentation of this technique and its gradual assignment to specific marketing territories, and finally, the questioning of its effectiveness and criticism of its acceptability by new consumer figures anxious to defend and express specific social values. This review provides an overview of current knowledge and opens up new research perspectives on the theme of shockvertising.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
震撼广告:一种有争议的广告手法的发展轨迹
本文旨在回顾一种颇具争议的广告手法--震撼广告(shockvertising),这种手法如今已被视为一种普通的广告工具。我们采用历史方法,建立了一个分析性语料库,涵盖了一个多世纪以来发表在《市场营销》和《广告学》上的有关震撼使用的研究成果。通过对该语料库的定性研究,我们勾勒出了震撼广告的制度轨迹,并将其演变分为几个时期。因此,我们可以观察到,一种最初受到第一批广告专业人士谴责的技术逐渐被接受,然后这种技术被细分,并逐渐被分配到特定的营销领域,最后,急于捍卫和表达特定社会价值观的新消费者对其有效性提出质疑,并对其可接受性提出批评。本综述概述了当前的知识,并就震撼广告这一主题开辟了新的研究视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flu vaccine hesitancy of French nurses and nurse aides: A fresh light on freedom-restoring strategies of reactance to pro-vaccine communication Shockvertising: Trajectory of a controversial advertising technique Commentary on “Look up! Five research proposals for rethinking marketing in a post-growth society”: Contribution of lacanian discourse to a more responsible marketing Consumer curiosity: A bibliometric and bibliographic synthesis Commentary on “Look up! Five research proposals for rethinking marketing in a post-growth society”: Marketing must reflect on its own evolution in the Anthropocene epoch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1