Closing the Racial Wealth Gap: A Counterfactual Historical Simulation of Universal Inheritance

RSF Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.04
Asher Dvir-Djerassi
{"title":"Closing the Racial Wealth Gap: A Counterfactual Historical Simulation of Universal Inheritance","authors":"Asher Dvir-Djerassi","doi":"10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the end of the civil rights movement, the United States has not made meaningful progress toward closing the racial wealth gap. Without deliberate policy intervention, this gap will likely persist. Racial justice activists and policymakers, aiming in part to close this gap, have put forth various reparations programs. Others have proposed race-neutral wealth redistribution policies that also promise to address the gap, but as an indirect consequence of redistributing wealth in general. The potential impact of this second set of proposals on racial wealth inequality remains understudied. This article addresses this deficit through counterfactual historical simulation: By assessing the thirty-year impact of these race-neutral proposals, it finds significant reductions in the racial wealth gap over a generation. Yet these race-neutral programs have limitations vis-à-vis the broader goals of racial justice; this article concludes by emphasizing the unique capacities of reparations programs to address these limitations.","PeriodicalId":516617,"journal":{"name":"RSF","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the end of the civil rights movement, the United States has not made meaningful progress toward closing the racial wealth gap. Without deliberate policy intervention, this gap will likely persist. Racial justice activists and policymakers, aiming in part to close this gap, have put forth various reparations programs. Others have proposed race-neutral wealth redistribution policies that also promise to address the gap, but as an indirect consequence of redistributing wealth in general. The potential impact of this second set of proposals on racial wealth inequality remains understudied. This article addresses this deficit through counterfactual historical simulation: By assessing the thirty-year impact of these race-neutral proposals, it finds significant reductions in the racial wealth gap over a generation. Yet these race-neutral programs have limitations vis-à-vis the broader goals of racial justice; this article concludes by emphasizing the unique capacities of reparations programs to address these limitations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小种族财富差距:全民继承的反事实历史模拟
自民权运动结束以来,美国在缩小种族贫富差距方面一直没有取得有意义的进展。如果没有审慎的政策干预,这种差距很可能会持续下去。种族正义活动家和政策制定者提出了各种赔偿计划,其部分目的就是为了缩小这种差距。还有一些人提出了不分种族的财富再分配政策,这些政策也有望解决差距问题,但却是财富再分配的间接结果。第二类建议对种族财富不平等的潜在影响仍未得到充分研究。本文通过反事实历史模拟来弥补这一不足:通过评估这些种族中立提案三十年来的影响,文章发现种族贫富差距在一代人的时间里显著缩小。然而,相对于更广泛的种族正义目标而言,这些种族中立的方案有其局限性;本文最后强调了赔偿方案解决这些局限性的独特能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RSF
RSF
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Justice Delayed: An Analysis of Local Proposals for Black Reparations Normalizing Reparations: U.S. Precedent, Norms, and Models for Compensating Harms and Implications for Reparations to Black Americans Crafting Democratic Futures: Understanding Political Conditions and Racialized Attitudes Toward Black Reparations Rehearsals for Reparations Closing the Racial Wealth Gap: A Counterfactual Historical Simulation of Universal Inheritance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1