Treatment of seafood processing wastewater toward carbon neutrality: A comparison between coagulation/flocculation, chemical oxidation and absorbent methods

Nguyen Chuyen Thuan , Vien Vinh Phat , Tran Thi Thai Hang , Tran Le Luu , Jana Tripple , Martin Wagner
{"title":"Treatment of seafood processing wastewater toward carbon neutrality: A comparison between coagulation/flocculation, chemical oxidation and absorbent methods","authors":"Nguyen Chuyen Thuan ,&nbsp;Vien Vinh Phat ,&nbsp;Tran Thi Thai Hang ,&nbsp;Tran Le Luu ,&nbsp;Jana Tripple ,&nbsp;Martin Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seafood processing wastewater contains many organic pollutants and nutrients that harm the environment if discharged without treatment. It is urgent to search for a solution to treat seafood processing wastewater for sustainable development purposes. This study aims to examine the different physico-chemical techniques used in seafood processing wastewater treatment, focusing on their ability to reduce pollutants with the aim of carbon neutrality. This study compares the effectiveness of coagulation-flocculation using Polyaluminium Chloride (PAC)/Anionic Polyacrylamide (APAM), chemical oxidation using Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC). The results show that coagulation-flocculation with a PAC concentration of 125 mg/L after 30 minutes achieved a removal efficiency of 73.0 % for total suspended solids (TSS), 14.6 % for total dissolved solids (TDS), 65.0 % for chemical oxygen demand (COD), 50.0 % color, 10.0 % total nitrogen (TN), 1.0 % ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), and 10.0 % total phosphorus (TP). The addition of 62.5 mg/L APAM increased the removal efficiencies to 75.0 % TSS, 15.0 % TDS, 68.0 % COD, 50.3 % color, 10.1 % TN, 1.01 % NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and 10.5 % TP. pH 6.5 was ideal for the pollutant removal efficiencies in seafood processing wastewater using coagulation/flocculation. On the other hand, when using 500 mg/L of NaOCl in chemical oxidation for 15 minutes, it resulted in much lower pollutant removal efficiencies of 11.0 % TSS, 26.0 % COD, 50.0 % color, 6.80 % TN, 35.0 % NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, while the TDS removal efficiency was not significant. Finally, using 20 g/L of GAC after 60 minutes recorded removal efficiencies of 75.0 % TSS, 18.0 % TDS, 56.8 % COD, 55.0 % color, 11.9 % TN, 20 % NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and 12.1 % TP. It was found that coagulation-flocculation was the most effective treatment method for seafood processing wastewater treatment when considering both the removal efficiency and cost benefit, at about 0.21 €/m<sup>3</sup>. These findings will help to develop efficient physico-chemical treatments for seafood processing wastewater with the aim of carbon neutrality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34388,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424001865/pdfft?md5=a2e74611041a66809e912ac3a6d5176f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666016424001865-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666016424001865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seafood processing wastewater contains many organic pollutants and nutrients that harm the environment if discharged without treatment. It is urgent to search for a solution to treat seafood processing wastewater for sustainable development purposes. This study aims to examine the different physico-chemical techniques used in seafood processing wastewater treatment, focusing on their ability to reduce pollutants with the aim of carbon neutrality. This study compares the effectiveness of coagulation-flocculation using Polyaluminium Chloride (PAC)/Anionic Polyacrylamide (APAM), chemical oxidation using Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC). The results show that coagulation-flocculation with a PAC concentration of 125 mg/L after 30 minutes achieved a removal efficiency of 73.0 % for total suspended solids (TSS), 14.6 % for total dissolved solids (TDS), 65.0 % for chemical oxygen demand (COD), 50.0 % color, 10.0 % total nitrogen (TN), 1.0 % ammonium (NH4+), and 10.0 % total phosphorus (TP). The addition of 62.5 mg/L APAM increased the removal efficiencies to 75.0 % TSS, 15.0 % TDS, 68.0 % COD, 50.3 % color, 10.1 % TN, 1.01 % NH4+, and 10.5 % TP. pH 6.5 was ideal for the pollutant removal efficiencies in seafood processing wastewater using coagulation/flocculation. On the other hand, when using 500 mg/L of NaOCl in chemical oxidation for 15 minutes, it resulted in much lower pollutant removal efficiencies of 11.0 % TSS, 26.0 % COD, 50.0 % color, 6.80 % TN, 35.0 % NH4+, while the TDS removal efficiency was not significant. Finally, using 20 g/L of GAC after 60 minutes recorded removal efficiencies of 75.0 % TSS, 18.0 % TDS, 56.8 % COD, 55.0 % color, 11.9 % TN, 20 % NH4+, and 12.1 % TP. It was found that coagulation-flocculation was the most effective treatment method for seafood processing wastewater treatment when considering both the removal efficiency and cost benefit, at about 0.21 €/m3. These findings will help to develop efficient physico-chemical treatments for seafood processing wastewater with the aim of carbon neutrality.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理海产品加工废水以实现碳中和:混凝/絮凝、化学氧化和吸收方法之间的比较
海产品加工废水中含有许多有机污染物和营养物质,如果不经处理排放,会对环境造成危害。为实现可持续发展,寻找处理海产品加工废水的解决方案迫在眉睫。本研究旨在考察海产品加工废水处理中使用的不同物理化学技术,重点关注其减少污染物的能力,以实现碳中和目标。本研究比较了使用聚合氯化铝(PAC)/阴离子聚丙烯酰胺(APAM)进行混凝絮凝、使用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)进行化学氧化以及使用颗粒活性炭(GAC)进行吸附的效果。结果表明,混凝-絮凝 30 分钟后,PAC 浓度为 125 毫克/升时,总悬浮固体(TSS)的去除率为 73.0%,总溶解固体(TDS)的去除率为 14.6%,化学需氧量(COD)的去除率为 65.0%,色度的去除率为 50.0%,总氮(TN)的去除率为 10.0%,铵(NH4+)的去除率为 1.0%,总磷(TP)的去除率为 10.0%。添加 62.5 mg/L 的 APAM 可将总悬浮固体(TSS)、总溶解氧(TDS)、化学需氧量(COD)、色度、总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)的去除率分别提高到 75.0%、15.0%、68.0%、50.3%、10.1%、1.01% 和 10.5%。另一方面,当使用 500 毫克/升 NaOCl 进行化学氧化 15 分钟时,污染物去除率大大降低,TSS 为 11.0%,COD 为 26.0%,色度为 50.0%,TN 为 6.80%,NH4+ 为 35.0%,而 TDS 的去除率则不明显。最后,在 60 分钟后使用 20 g/L 的 GAC,TSS 去除率为 75.0%,TDS 去除率为 18.0%,COD 去除率为 56.8%,色度去除率为 55.0%,TN 去除率为 11.9%,NH4+ 去除率为 20%,TP 去除率为 12.1%。研究发现,从去除效率和成本效益两方面考虑,混凝-絮凝法是最有效的海产品加工废水处理方法,去除率约为 0.21 欧元/立方米。这些发现将有助于开发高效的海产品加工废水物理化学处理方法,以实现碳中和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
The economic valuation of environmental damages in scenarios of tailings dams' ruptures: The case of Brumadinho's catastrophe, Minas Gerais, Brazil A framework model to prioritize groundwater management actions based on the concept of dominant risk: An application to the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil Determination of the effect of impurity inclusions in the form of oxy-nitride phases in NiAl2O4 ceramics on resistance to high-temperature degradation during hydrogen saturation of near-surface layers Dual antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of novel 1,2,3-triazole-decorated unsymmetrical monocarbonyl curcumin analogs Biodiesel production of WCO-neem oil and mixed using pilot plant scale with ultrasound and overhead stirred and characteristic of emissions in fire tube boiler
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1