Eco-friendly modified engineered cementitious composites: a study on mechanical, durability and microstructure characteristics

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1617/s11527-024-02403-0
N. Shanmugasundaram, S. Praveenkumar
{"title":"Eco-friendly modified engineered cementitious composites: a study on mechanical, durability and microstructure characteristics","authors":"N. Shanmugasundaram,&nbsp;S. Praveenkumar","doi":"10.1617/s11527-024-02403-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research examined the development of modified engineered cementitious composites (MECC) using manufactured sand (M-sand) and a high content of raw agricultural by-products, such as bagasse ash (BA) and rice husk ash (RHA), instead of conventional silica sand and fly ash. Fourteen different types of MECC mixtures were developed using raw BA and RHA blended with M-sand to reduce the cost of MECC. The fresh and hardened properties of all mixtures were examined using various types of testing methods. In addition, microstructure analysis were conducted for both the control and optimal mixtures to identify the bonding of fibres in cementitious composites. The correlation between conventional and MECC was also evaluated based on the hardened properties and cost analysis. The results revealed that workability steadily dwindled with increasing percentages of BA and RHA, from 10 to 55. Optimal mechanical properties were attained with the incorporation of BA and RHA at 10% cement replacement. In contrast, 30% BA and 40% RHA exhibited maximum impact strength compared to the respective control mixes. Similarly, ECC with 20% BA and RHA exhibited optimal durability properties. Moreover, compared to conventional ECC, the cost of the newly developed MECC was slightly lesser due to the incorporation of agricultural by-products and M-sand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-024-02403-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examined the development of modified engineered cementitious composites (MECC) using manufactured sand (M-sand) and a high content of raw agricultural by-products, such as bagasse ash (BA) and rice husk ash (RHA), instead of conventional silica sand and fly ash. Fourteen different types of MECC mixtures were developed using raw BA and RHA blended with M-sand to reduce the cost of MECC. The fresh and hardened properties of all mixtures were examined using various types of testing methods. In addition, microstructure analysis were conducted for both the control and optimal mixtures to identify the bonding of fibres in cementitious composites. The correlation between conventional and MECC was also evaluated based on the hardened properties and cost analysis. The results revealed that workability steadily dwindled with increasing percentages of BA and RHA, from 10 to 55. Optimal mechanical properties were attained with the incorporation of BA and RHA at 10% cement replacement. In contrast, 30% BA and 40% RHA exhibited maximum impact strength compared to the respective control mixes. Similarly, ECC with 20% BA and RHA exhibited optimal durability properties. Moreover, compared to conventional ECC, the cost of the newly developed MECC was slightly lesser due to the incorporation of agricultural by-products and M-sand.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态友好型改性工程水泥基复合材料:力学、耐久性和微观结构特征研究
这项研究考察了改性工程水泥基复合材料(MECC)的开发情况,其中使用了人造砂(M-sand)和高含量的未加工农副产品,如蔗渣灰(BA)和稻壳灰(RHA),而不是传统的硅砂和粉煤灰。为了降低 MECC 的成本,我们使用掺有 M 砂的未加工 BA 和 RHA 研发了 14 种不同类型的 MECC 混合物。使用各种测试方法对所有混合物的新鲜和硬化性能进行了检测。此外,还对对照和最佳混合物进行了微观结构分析,以确定纤维在水泥基复合材料中的粘结情况。还根据硬化性能和成本分析评估了传统混合料和 MECC 之间的相关性。结果表明,随着 BA 和 RHA 所占比例从 10%到 55%的增加,可加工性稳步下降。当 BA 和 RHA 的水泥替代率为 10%时,可达到最佳机械性能。相比之下,30% 的 BA 和 40% 的 RHA 与各自的对照混合料相比,冲击强度最大。同样,添加了 20% BA 和 RHA 的 ECC 具有最佳的耐久性能。此外,与传统的 ECC 相比,新开发的 MECC 由于加入了农副产品和混合砂,成本略低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
期刊最新文献
Effect of activator dosage and mass ratio of GGBFS to FA on 3D printing performance of kenaf geopolymer Investigation into the flexural performance of novel precast sandwich wall panels Inorganic–organic hybrid geopolymers: evolution of molecular and pore structure, and its effect on mechanical and fire-retardant properties Assessment of waste eggshell powder as a limestone alternative in portland cement Autogenous shrinkage and cracking of ultra-high-performance concrete with soda residue as an internal curing agent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1